1. Logical Framework Analysis/Approach (LFA)

27. Narrative Summary Objectively Verifiable Indicators - OVIs Means of Verification -MOVs External Factors (Assumptions) Development Objective Immediate Objective Outputs (Results) 1. 2. 3. Activities 1. 2. 3. 4. Inputs 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

43. SWOT Analysis S-W O-T Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities S-O STRATEGY W-O STRATEGY Threats S-T STRATEGY W-T STRATEGY

47. Stakeholder Interest on the Program Position on the Program Impact of the Program Influence on the Program MILALITTRA / Tribal Leaders Security of land tenure; productivity Support Capacity-building; political participation; livelihood opportunities High Women’s Group Help provide food for the family; additional income; education for the children Support Additional source of income; capacity-building; education of children Moderate Fr. Kit Bautista - CFI Miarayon becoming a pilgrimage site and a bridge between the poorest of the poor and richest of the rich Support Realization of his dream; abridgement of social gaps between rich and poor High Parish Priest / Principal Increased enrolment in high school; improved quality of education; evangelization and preservation of culture Support Increased enrolment; expansion of services; improvement of educational facility High Gina – Pre-School Provide equal access to quality education to as many children in the country Potential opposition Phasing-out of pre-school High CFI Increase literacy rate and improve self-sufficiency of IPs Support Financial sustainability; focusing of programs; matching services to needs of IPs High Barangay Officials Peace and order; improvement of income of IPs Support Increased employment for the people; improved peace and order condition Moderate NCIP Promotion and protection of the rights of IPs; implementation of IPRA and ADSDPP Support Increased performance of advocacy High LGU – Talakag Promotion of general welfare; local autonomy; delivery of basic services; agricultural productivity; peace and order Support Increased trust for IPs’ capacity; improved peace and order condition; increased revenue High Traders’ group More profit from trading activities Potential opposition Decreased income due to rerouting of products Moderate Religious nuns Evangelization; promotion of education Support Increased enrolment; potential increase of the faithful High Land claimants Legitimization of claims on lands allegedly purchased from the IPs Oppose Loss of rights to claim and use the land High

49. Activities Target Output Time Frame In-Charge Resources Qty. Quality Planning 1 Action Plan Attainable August 2005 CFI BOD, TESDA Funds Phasing-out of Pre-schools 2 pre-schools Acceptable terms July 2005 – May 2006 CFI None Signing of MOA with St. Therese H/S 1 MOA signed Acceptable terms July 2005 – May 2006 CFI & Therese H/S None Review / Reformulation of Adult Education modules 1 standard module developed Appropriate, attuned to indigenous culture July 2005 – May 2006 CFI staff, teachers, DepEd Supplies Adult Literacy Program 450 IPs Can read & write, learned spiritual, cultural, and social values 2006-2010 CFI staff and teachers Rooms, teachers, teaching materials TNA At least 3 skills training identified; ex. Food processing, farming tech., etc. Understandable & measurable 2006-2010 CFI staff, TESDA & other agencies Questionnaire Drafting of ADSDPP IEC on Environmental Management 15-20 IP leaders informed Appropriate & understandable July 2005 CFI, NCIP, MILALITTRA, & DENR Funds, resource persons Tribal Leaders’ Consultation 15-20 IP leaders consulted participative Aug 2005 CFI, NCIP, & MILALITTRA Funds, resource persons

51. Narrative Summary Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVI) Means of Verification Assumptions & Risks Activities EMTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT Planning One (1) year plan drafted by July 2005 CFI Plan of Action Funds are accessed from funding agency Sourcing of funds 1 Project funded by January 2006 Memomorandum of Agreement with funding agency Collaboration with concerned agencies and business sector established Identification of coffee areas for rehabilitation 1,000 hectares identified by 2005 Report of Project Director Lending of Initial capital 1,000 farmers entered into MOA through MILALITTRA by 2006 CFI Annual Report Monitoring 1,000 hectares plantation monitored by 2010 Report of Project Director Establishment of trading partners At least 2 partners identified (Figaro, Monk’s Blend) by 2005 MOA with Figaro and Monk’s Blend Buying and Trading 80% target volume of sales attained by 2007 CFI Sales Report

52. Narrative Summary Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVI) Means of Verification Assumptions & Risks Activities CAPABILITY BUILDING Planning 1 Action Plan drafted by August 2005 Action Plan document Phasing-out of Pre-schools 2 pre-schools phased-out by May 2006 CFI Annual Report Signing of MOA with St. Therese H/S 1 MOA signed by May 2006 MOA with St. Therese Review / Reformulation of Adult Education modules 1 standard module developed by May 2006 Written curriculum approved by DepEd Adult Literacy Program 450 IPs trained by 2010 CFI Annual Report TNA At least 3 skills training identified; ex. Food processing, farming tech., etc.; by 2010 CFI Annual Report and DepEd Promotion Report IEC on Environmental Management 15-20 IP leaders informed by July 2005 Evaluation Report on Seminar Workshop Tribal Leaders’ Consultation 15-20 IP leaders consulted by August 2005 ADSDPP Report / NCIP Report Precondition Cartwheel adopts this management plan Collaboration established with NCIP and other government agencies

60. How stakeholders are affected by the main problem? Stakeholder How is the stakeholder affected by the problem? Capacity / Motivation to participate in addressing the problem Relationship with other stakeholders 1. LGU Potential income is not realized Fund sourcing Give directions to other stakeholder 2. BLGU Potential income is not realized Provide counterpart Sympathetic with the households and can be source of information 3. RHU Additional workload Right agency to address the problem Close coordination with the barangay 4. DAF Additional workload Responsible agency for farming technology Supervise and monitor the beneficiaries 5. Households Directly and most affected Interest and willingness to participate in the program Dependent on government agencies and dependent only on available resources 6. HKI Willing to address the problem Maybe able to provide assistance to the program Coordinate with the LGU and other stakeholders 7. Other donors Willing to address the problem Maybe able to provide assistance to the program Coordinate with the LGU and other stakeholders

61. Expected effect of possible project interventions among stakeholders Stakeholder Stakeholder’s main objective Positive impact/benefits Negative impact/costs Net Impact 1. LGU Address the problem Reduce the incidence of malnutrition among children ages 5 and below Slow realization of result Long-term – weight improve, decrease morbidity rate, availability of sources of nutritious food 2. BLGU Address the problem 3. RHU Implement what is mandated by law 4. DAF 5. Households Improve health condition 6. HKI Help and assist project implementation 7. Other donors