Presentation given at the invitation of the SASICE research group on June 6th 2011 and hosted by the Catholic University of Leuven (KUL).
It gathers some ideas for teaching structural safety and reliability to engineers.
1. Safe structures
Benoit PARMENTIER
Head Division Structures
BBRI (www.bbri.be)
Engineers Education Needs from the Industry
2. BBRI Knowledge system
(some) BBRI Collaborations
It is like a PCM (phase changing material)
3. New generation of
Societal needs
Techno logies
Engineers
Global competitors
Safe structures = Basics
Society wants more…
Digital Natives
Worldwide
Computing
Communication
…
33. [Recap]
Feel the structure & material behaviour
Benefit from calculation power (numerical methods)
Able to pre-design
Try to reduce safety factors (if appropriate and safely)
Add value for worldwide competition
Be prepared for unexpected (beyond probabilistic approaches)
Manage ethics
Future engineers must…
to design (economically) safe structures…
We have different visions due to our collaborations (global view of the sector)Skills specific to different activities and some are common.We are a « PCM » system.
25% of the chinese population with the higher IQ is greater than the population of North America : they have more honor kids than they (we) have kids.Techno : numerical, cloud, communication (digitally), positioning systems, maintenance, lasers, …
Créatifs, multi-tâches, mobiles, collaboratifs, interconnectés, habitués à avoir l’info rapidement ; Google has the answer.But are they (civ engineers) always thinking about FEM tools for working with ?
3000 books are published every day but think only about digital medias !They will promptly go to internet to find information (reflex). But what kind of information ? Continuous learning cyles…
Wikipedia : 1 111 232 articles and more than 5000 active contributors (2011).135 000 entries en French dictionnaryUp-to-date ? Reliable ? (reflex for DN)
Sustainability, back to vernacular architecture ?So high structures (think about Burj Khalifa in Dubai ; between brackets, I heared that the appartements were not promptly sold).
9/10 large projects in civil engineering are calculated now with FEM.DN do not want automatically work with FEM…(paradox)
Costs evolution is inversely proportional to Number of occurrences (let’s say average return period)All situations must be considered (not calculated with details)
Problems with water discharge systemsSecond order phenomenon/effect
From tree leaves
1976 : first version of JCSS report (Bulletin 112)2001 : Last versionGeneration Gap (Elastic method vs. Limit states)
Design situationsCombination, history of loading important because rigidity is influenced by cracking.
Flights therminal
Quality control, people certification, …Concrete quality on site, rebars position, section geometry,….can be checked and reduced safety factors can hence be used.
How the forces are transfered (see eg anchors)
Around 1950.Creativity is sometimes opposed to standards (think also about soilmixing). Engineers must provide evidence (for clients, control offices,…).Sometimes, codes must be fighted.
Companies invest a lot for harmonization support because they sell more products if everybody speaks the same language.+BIM
Stress concentrations…better results ?
Product development (CLT is a current example but there are plenty of others)Phase duration => know statistics
Japan disasterBeyond codes currently usedRisks assessement => méthode pour coûts
RISK assessment, like for natural disastersAlso for geotechnical works (play with partial safety factors if economical benefits).Technical agreements (for reducing safety factors, also for execution), quality control, more tests allow for better characteristic valuesIdem for concrete repair, Certification ? Also for fire design !!
Select the good materials. Benefit from other industries developments…Open for non traditionnal materials (or collaborate)