5. • More content visible to end users
• Content linking is more accurate for end users
• Increase in content usage
• Maximum reach for authors and editors
• Better return on investment for library
• Favourable renewal decision
• Protection of revenue for content providers
6. • Standards / industry • Rose Robinson, Publishing Technology
• Andreas Biedenbach, Independent
organisations
• Ruth Wells, Taylor & Francis
– UKSG and NISO
• Julie Zhu, AIP
• Working group members • AIP, T&F, Royal Society
(stakeholders): Publishing, Publishing
Technology, Cengage
– Knowledge base vendors & Gale, Swets, Springer
Subscription Agents
– Libraries & Consortia
• Ben Johnson, Serials Solutions
• Magaly Bascones, JISC
• Christine Stohn, Ex Libris
• Sarah Price, University of Birmingham
• Paul Moss, OCLC
• Louise Cole, Kingston University
• Sheri Meares, EBSCO
• Chad Hutchens, University of
• Marieke Heins, Swets
Wyoming
– Content Providers (Publisher & • Jason Price, Claremont
Aggregators) Colleges/SCELC
• Matthew Llewellin, The Royal Society • Liz Stephenson, University of
• Gary Pollack, Cengage Learning Edinburgh
7. KBART’s lifespan
Phase 1 – Universally accepted standardized publisher
metadata, regularly distributed AND available on
demand
Phase 2 – Broad adoption, Consortia, More content type
coverage (eBooks, conference proceedings), Open
Access materials
– Draft now in final stages
– Available for public review in Q1 2013
Phase 3? – Even more content types, automated delivery,
institutional metadata????
8. KBART Phase II
Adoption – KBART Registry:
https://sites.google.com/site/kbartregistry/
Recommendations: E-Books (Monographs) and Conference Proceedings
(Serials)
• 8 New monographic fields
• Book series: parent_publication_title_id/ preceding_publication_title_id
Recommendations: Consortia
• Recommendation for consortium-specific title lists when appropriate
• Addition of labels (region/consortium value) to file names
Recommendations: Open Access
• new field access_type
• “F” – title is mostly fee-based (subscription/purchase)
• “OA” – 50% or more of the title is OA/freely accessible.
9. Publisher Involvement
1. Everything can be found at
http://www.uksg.org/kbart/endorsement
2. Review the requirements (data samples available)
3. Format your title lists accordingly.
4. Self-check to ensure they conform to the
recommended practice
5. Ensure that you have a process in place for regular
data updates
6. Register your organization on the KBART registry
website: http://bit.ly/kbartregistry
10. Supplemental Journal Article Materials –
now published!
Business Working Group:
• Linda Beebe, Co-Chair, APA
• Marie McVeigh, Co-Chair, Thomson Reuters
• Annette Flanagin, JAMA
• Bonnie Lawlor, NFAIS
• David Gillikin, NLM
• Alison Loudon, AIP
• Bruce Kiesel, Thomson Reuters
• Skip Maier, APA
• Rachael Hu, California Digital Library
• Eefke Smit, STM
• Amy Kirchoff, JSTOR/Portico
• Scott Virkler, Elsevier
Technical Working Group:
• David Martinsen, Co-Chair, ACS
• Alexander (Sasha) Schwarzman, Co-Chair, AGU and OSA
• IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Elsevier
• John Meyer, JSTOR/Portico
• Ken Beauchamp, American Society for Clinical Investigation
• Ira Polans, IEEE
• Jeffrey Beck, NLM
• Craig Rodkin, ACM
• Chuck Koscher, CrossRef
• Kathleen Sheedy, APA
• John Kunze, California Digital Library
• Keith Wollman, Elsevier
• Kathy Kwan, NLM
• Deborah Lapeyre, Mulberry Technologies, Inc.
11. Background
• Technology now enables authors to expand
or support published articles with
“Supplemental Materials”
• Multimedia
• Text
• Tables
• Figures
• Data, computer programs
• Some Supplemental materials may be useful
but not critical
12. Purpose
• Help the scholarly publishing community
develop a more standardized approach for
supplemental materials
• Rapidly changing technology environment
• Lessen burden on all parties in publishing
process
• Help materials add substance to scholarship
• Make these materials more discoverable
• Aid in preservation of these materials
13. General principles of RP (12)
• Respectful of variance in issues across
disciplines and types of content
• Determination of materials is responsibility of
journal
• Intended to address content owned, published
and hosted by journal publisher
• Data constitute a unique category of content – in
general management of data is out of scope
14. Part A: Policies
• Selection
• Editing
• Managing and Hosting
• Ensuring discoverability and fundability
(references, A&I, citations)
• Metadata and packaging
• Maintaining links,
• Providing context
• Preserving materials
• Rights management
15. Part B: Technical Considerations
• Metadata
• Elements
• Persistent identifiers
• Preservation
• Packaging and exchange
• Location of material
• supporting documentation
– non-normative DTD to express metadata recommendations
– a tag library to serve as an easy guide to the DTD - visual
schema representation of the DTD and an HTML representation
of the DTD
– examples of metadata markup
FocusLocal-area library courier servicesregional library, statewide and multi-state courier servicesInternal branch delivery systems – some stuff does applyUSPS, FedEx, UPS, etc.
Widely adopted by publishers, archives, and libraries for interchange and archiving journal articlesJATS moved from NLM to NISO to facilitate international adoptionTwo parts: The NISO Standard An official NISO documentZ39.96-201XSupporting MaterialUnofficialHosted by NLM - Web site and codeGuidance on usage and helpful toolsDocument models in DTD, XSD, and RNG formExtensive prose documentation (Tag Libraries)Tagged SamplesStarter XSLT code for formatting journal articles in HTML and PDF (through XSL-FO)Instructions on how to use the JATS to build additional Tag SetsCommittee working on both partsBoth parts maintained in parallel