E-mentoring for Employability and Internationalisation
1. Dr Andrea Wheeler, William Bancroft, Professor
Simon Austin and Professor Jacqui Glass
The Centre for Engineering & Design Education, 1st Floor, Keith Green Building
School of Civil and Building Engineering
E-mentoring: Developing
powerful partnerships with
industry employers
June 24th 2013
Moscow State Technical University, Bauman University
2. Higher Education Academy Award –
Departmental Grant - School of Civil and
Building Engineering £39,500 January
2012 – June 2013
E-mentoring for employability
5. • Construction vacancies have dropped 50%
since 2001 .
• 5.1% reduction in graduate employment from
2001 to 2012. (18.9% unemployed)
• Figures show that nearly 36% are employed in
a lower skilled job compared with 26.7% in
2001 (the Graduates in the Labour Market
2012 report published by the Office for
National Statistics).
Statistics
7. Loughborough University Engineering
Statistics
Graduate Employment Statistics for Loughborough Engineering Graduates (6 months after
graduation)
Standard Publication Category Number of Graduates Percentage of Graduates
Full-time paid work only
(including self-employed)
384 65.1%
Part-time paid work only 17 2.9%
Voluntary/Unpaid work only 4 0.7%
Work and further study 71 12.0%
Further study only 41 6.9%
Assumed to be unemployed 45 7.6%
Not available for employment 23 3.9%
Other 2 0.3%
Explicit refusal 3 0.5%
8. I really have worries about my post
PhD life because I would like to be
involved with industry, but
suddenly feel like I am a fresh
university graduate (even after
getting PhD!). There is so much
uncertainty, and if I am being
honest some lack of confidence on
my part (Loughborough University,
School of Civil and Building
Engineering, International PhD
Student 2011).
9. I spent my placement year
working in Malaysia. I am a
home student but have no
work experience in the
engineering or construction
industries in the UK.
11. THE TEAM
Associate Dean for Teaching, Professor Simon Austin;
Director of Under Graduate Studies, Professor Jacqui
Glass;
Staff Development Officer (Research Staff Mentoring),
Michele Zala,
Senior Careers Development Advisor - Susan Reed;
Design Education Coordinator and the Regional
Representative of the Institution of Civil Engineers,
Malcolm Jackson.
13. THE SUPPORT FROM INDUSTRY
Interserve Construction
CH2M Hill
A-one
AMEC
Environment Agency
Atkins Ltd
Smith and Wallwork Engineers
Pick Everard
Morgan Tucker
Costain
Balfour Beatty
Pick Everard
Arup Midland Construction
Jacobs Engineering
Stomor Limited
Network Rail
Morgan Sindall
Carillion
British Power International
AECOM
Halcrow
Costain
Interserve
PrP UK
Kier Construction Limited
Laing O’Rouke
14. Institute of Civil Engineers (ICE)
President, Richard Coakley
“Harnessing the energy of the ICE’s partnerships with industry and
Government” presentation to the Department of Civil and Building Engineering
The President of the ICE, Richard Coackley:
The e-mentoring pilot scheme, headed by Professor Simon Austin, links students with
construction professionals according to interest and career path to provide the principles
of traditional mentoring but exploiting the free and readily available technologies of
Skype, social media and e-mail to foster the awareness of professional practice and the
needs of employers. This is an excellent example of harnessing the energy: with mentors
using their time and energy to harness and refine the energy of their mentees providing
them with important experience of industry. (Richard Coackley, 20th April 2012,
Loughborough University School of Civil and Building Engineering).
16. Can e-mentoring provide engineering and
construction students, particularly those with an
international perspective, with an educational
opportunity which will significantly improve their
employment opportunities?
If it can, how does it do it?
18. I was brought in during the
summer 2012 to review the first
mentoring scheme and assist with
the organisation of the second
but I also took the programme
into my final year dissertation so I
am still involved in the project.
20. …boundaryless, egalitarian and qualitatively
different….
…ease and immediacy…
Same function as mentoring added benefits…
But a difficulty in forming mentoring
relationships virtually?
O'Neill, k. D., Li, S. & Weiler, M., 2005. Software support for online mentoring programs: a research-inspired design. Mentoring and
tutoring , 13(1), pp. 109-131.
Single, P. B. & Muller, C. B., 2001. When e-mail and mentoring unite: the implementation of a nationwide electronic mentoring
program. Creating mentoring and coaching programs , 1(1), pp. 107-122
Bierema, L. L. & Merriam, S. B., 2002. E-mentoring; Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process.
innovative higher education , 26(3), pp. 211-227.
Zey, M. G., 1984. The mentor connection, IL:Dow Jones-Irwin: Homewood.
21. • e-mentoring programs… to “‘level the playing-field’
by providing mentoring opportunities for those who
otherwise would be left out of important informal
network”.
• Earliest e-mentoring programs focused on creating
educational and professional opportunities for
underprivileged or underrepresented populations.
The history of e-mentoring
22. Less stereotyping within mentoring
relationships…
Outsiders…more impartial advice… less
vested interest
Sproul, L. & Kiesler, S., 1993. Connections: New ways of working in networked organisations, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Single, P. B. & Single, R. M., 2005. E-mentoring for social equity: review of information to inform program development. Mentoring and
tutoring , 13(2), pp. 301-320.
23. E-mentoring v. mentoring
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages Disadvantages
It creates an egalitarian environment Slower relationship development
Mentors provide impartial inter-
organisational advice
Lesser role modelling
Logistics / ease (communicate anywhere
any time)
Reduced commitment?
Miscommunication
Computer and writing skills needed
25. • The impact of social and cultural capital: graduates from
less privileged backgrounds are less likely to know how to
“work the system”
• Developing ‘soft skills’, personal qualities and dispositions
is easier for some than others.
• Students often do not know what they want their working
lives to be.
Employability – the literature – the problems
26. Drivers for a changing work context
• Extreme longevity
• Computational world
• Superstructured organisations
• The rise of smart machines and
systems
• New media ecology
• Globally connected world
Willen-Augenti (2012) Society 3.0 How Technology is Reshaping
Education, Work and Society
27. Changing skills/ Future Work Skills 2020
1. "transdisciplinarity" (understanding concepts across
multiple disciplines),
2. "virtual collaboration" (proficiency in working as
part of geographically dispersed teams),
3. "cross-cultural competency" (ability to operate in
multicultural settings).
4. “Social intelligence” (workers who can build
collegial and productive online relationships will be in
high demand). “As organizations expand globally, social
intelligence will help managers build virtual workgroups
comprising the right blend of talent and personalities,”
31. • Even within an increasingly internationalised HE
context international students can lack cultural
competence: the ability to make correct attributions
about the cultural values, beliefs and behaviours
and norms of the new society.
Internationalisation – the literature
32. “Intercultural competence”
…the ability to communicate those working in or from
different cultures – free from prejudice and motivated to
continued learning: A set of cognitive, behavioural, and
affective/motivational components that enable
individuals to adapt effectively in intercultural
environments.
33. • Still asking can e-mentoring improve employability and how? Also,
asking: are there new ways thinking about employability emerging
from a changing and more internationalised Higher Education
community – from students, academic and industry collaborators -
demanding curriculum support from HE;
• Do e-mentoring schemes provide a testing ground for the discovery of
this need for change?
• Can e-mentoring schemes support international students whose work
experience (or lack of) can differ significantly from UK based or
European students
• Can such programmes prepare them for work either in the UK or
internationally where industry is becoming increasingly globalised?
Research Questions
34. METHOD
Two pilots, each 5 months.
12 relationships in each pilot (self- selecting).
Launch event (meeting for the first time),
interim questionnaires, interviews and final
“cafe-event”/workshops.
Qualitative evaluation of both mentor and
mentee experiences
35. The E-MENTORING Pilot 1: “Improving Student
Employability Through E-Mentoring”.
(February 2012 – June 2012)
• Recruited mentors and mentees. Mentors were
young, 2- 7 years post qualification. Mentees
from the School of Civil and Building
Engineering (without placement experience).
• Invited to a launch meeting to meet
mentors/mentees and have some training (all
online).
• Left to get on with it. Some emails. Some
invitations to feedback via online
questionnaires.
• June – August interim interviews.
• September, review of programme and revision
ahead of pilot 2.
36. The E-MENTORING Pilot 2: “Improving Student
Employability Through E-Mentoring”.
(October 2012 – March 2013)
• Recruited mentors and mentees (included some PhD
students).
• Invited to a launch meeting to meet mentors/mentee.
Refined and less formal meeting.
• Left to get on with it. Some emails. Some invitations to
feedback via online questionnaires.
• Interim questionnaires.
• Cafe event
• Videos
37. THEMES
Success (mentee and mentor benefits)
Limiting factors (including mentee
motivation)
Matching (poor matching)
Communications, type and frequency
Relationship progress (poor relationship
development)
Qualitative Thematic Analysis
38. Insights
• Success - mentees have reported (to various degrees) career development, networking, and
in some cases, role modelling.
• Limiting factors - PhD and Masters students weren’t able to commit sufficient time to the
scheme;
• Matching - more parallel educational and career paths were, the more the mentoring pair
perceived their match as a success.
• Communications - all mentoring pairs who explored communication technologies but didn’t
have regular contact showed some heightened relationship levels but not to the levels of
mentoring pairs with regular contact. In terms of technology use there was no general
consensus as to which method was better for facilitating an e-mentoring scheme.
• Relationship progress - during pilot scheme 1 an international student reported finding it
hard to break the ice in the questionnaire but when interviewed 2 months later reported
having a close and meaningful relationship; this was backed up with a dramatic increase in
communication and a change in communication technique. A handful of mentees reported
not feeling comfortable asking probing questions of their mentor even at the end of the e-
mentoring scheme, but a lot of mentoring pairs built very close relationships and have
continued the mentoring outside of the Loughborough programme.
39. Does e-mentoring improve skills for the
graduate employment market ?
E-mentoring provides an opportunity for mentees to discover the skills
they may need in a rapidly changing work context. But it is also much
more than this…
giving confidence,
networking,
discovering work skills they don’t know they have
40. The main discussions were about
identifying the skills the mentee has got
and bringing it out and presenting it
nicely whether that is on the CV or
whether that is at interview. For
example, some projects or coursework
he has done that he is not aware that
could be used to show the development
of, or skills he has got, actually I brought
that out from him. *…+ So it is mainly
about identifying his skills but also about
providing advice about how he could get
employed through fairs, through
journals and through relationships with
people really. So giving advice,
sometimes encouraging and giving him
confidence, I think that’s really
important especially in this economic
climate, as I am sure he is a good
candidate. He will be employed.
MENTOR
confidence
skills he did not know
he had
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfWDGmmu2Kw
41. Mainly it was about the CV, tweaking it
to specify for certain companies or
certain audiences. And Chartership,
looking at how to get yourself chartered,
just developing the professional side of
your personality with professional skills
so that they can all add onto your CV.
Even if you’re just starting your
Chartership or your personal
development plan, put that in you CV.
Stuff that I wouldn’t have even thought
about, even though I haven’t completed
it, show I’ve started it, shows your
willingness to engage and willingness to
progress your knowledge. *…+ Where to
look for jobs don’t look where everyone
else I looking, there’s a good reason why
everyone is looking there but you’ve got
more competition, things like cold
calling, letters, looking at who’s doing
well in the news, industry specific
magazines and things, so they will have a
good chance of recruiting, and approach
them but with a tailored CV to make sure
you *seem like+ you’re going to them in
the first place.
MENTEE
Stuff I had not even
thought about
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yJSa4ip7rM
42. MENTORActually we didn’t have a very good start with
my mentee because he couldn’t attend the
first meeting so we didn’t have the first face-
to-face conversation with him. But I just
dropped and email and then everything
started. It went quite well actually I got quite
nice responses from him and so we are still in
contact and you know sharing ideas, just
telling what’s going on in his life and his
application he’s done lately. So yes it is quite
good. *…+ He is looking for a graduate
engineer role in a large sized company and he
wants to know how he can find a job of
course but he does have enough experience
in interviews, so generally we are talking
about job interviews and using the job search
tools and how he can find a job on the
internet. Well we started with LinkedIn
because I’m sort of active on LinkedIn so I just
shared all my networks so he can just see
recruiters HR people headhunted etc., he is
quite good with that one. *…+ I advised him to
create a profile on LinkedIn and he did. We
started with that but we will try the other
websites where he can look for a job and also
I am planning to send him to graduate
engineers in my company so he can share
ideas with them because I know there are
some specific websites just for graduates.
networks and
networking skills
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V97XkN1O35c
43. MENTEE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvo-7IY0l08
It has been a wonderful experience
having someone who you can call a
mentor has been the greatest
experience as we’ve been discussing
earlier, there are so many avenues in
terms of what’s available to help you out
in terms of getting a job or becoming
more employable but these avenues are
very one dimensional. For example I
could use a magazine and it would tell
me what I need to do with my CV and
what you need to say in an interview but
this is very one dimensional *…+ whereas
having a mentor they can give you
various perspectives on what these
interviews or job opportunities have and
they can give you more than one route
to follow. That is one of the greatest
things mentoring can provide.
Discussions are around what I as a
mentee have been facing discussion and
have looked deeper than what the
mentors have said and it is about making
yourself an all rounded person beyond
the CV. The CV is the first point of
contact but when you’re called in for an
interview the CV becomes a side issue,
they want to see what you are as an
individual.
Not one dimension
avenues in terms of
employability, various
perspectives…
Discussions look
deeper, start with
what I as mentee have
been facing…
44. Can e-mentoring facilitate an understanding of
inter-cultural employment skills - working
practices across cultures ?
• Understanding different working cultures
• Mutual development of intercultural competence –
mentors and mentees
45. Internationalisation - Narratives and
experience (Mentee Pilot 1) A different work
culture
…things that really stand out for me are that at this level after Masters when
we go back home we’re going to be more of manager’s than technical people.
People management, which is a very difficult thing, working with big groups,
I’ve learnt a couple of things about that. The thing I’ve learnt is about
strategies, this was completely new to me, you know. Every business,
everything in life, there’s a strategy. You need to know where you want to go
and have some sort of plan to get there. Before we just used to wake up and
do things and get there (International Masters Student).
46. Things are good in Kigali Rwanda. Yes am still in touch with
him. I got a new job since I returned so I run that
concurrently with my private business. Its all in real estate
and architect consultancy.
I hope life is good for you in UK. Thanks for asking. Do
keep in touch.
Still in touch…
47. “If I’m honest he didn’t really raise many questions to me. *...+ It was more me trying
to force the issue sometimes. He’s a very polite guy, he’s a very nice guy, I wonder
whether he’s almost too polite to ask me certain things thinking he was taking up my
time. [...] I mean some of the things – he kind of indicated stuff as he was sending an
email through he’d say coming towards the end of his PhD kind of thing and from
that I kind of latched on to you know what are you thinking of doing? This is what I
did, you know use the library to look at companies and stuff and we kind of got a bit
of a rapport going near the end and I think it had some success hopefully. He was
thinking that he would have to go back to Nigeria and possibly into academia and I
kind of said actually there are different routes through.
He’s almost too polite to ask me certain
things…
48. SUMMARY – A different sort of employability
programme - a student led approach to
employability and a unique time and space ?
Less limiting definition of employability: an opportunity to being
the live the lives they value – to discover the sorts of working
lives they would like, identify aims, and begin to make decisions
that will allow them to achieve these lives.
49. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJzHY9LN7F8
We’re been talking about
how I can help him improve
his CV and a lot about
interviews. At the start there
was a lot about this but as
the conversations moved on
it was more about what
should I say at interview,
what’s the industry like,
what sort of job roles should
I pin point, life experience in
general. You know I’ve been
working afew years now and
I’ve got experience to tell
him …you should really avoid
this sort of thing but if you
enjoy this sort of thing go for
it and do your best.
MENTOR
CVs and interviews
but about life
experiences in general
Insight into the
industry
Tailored advice, what
he should avoid and
what to go for
50. I was in placement in another
country so I still didn't have UK
experience. I was in Malaysia
with a UK contractor but it was
still a lot different to what it
would have been with a UK
contractor. He offered to help me
in a variety of different ways
including course work with the
University but we chose to focus
on employability and applying
for jobs, helping me with my CV
and he was open most of the
time so I could speak to him
whenever I wanted to . It was
good for me as I always had
someone to speak to about
subjects quite formal but he gave
me the opportunity to speak
quite informally so it was very
comfortable for me.
MENTEE
He was open to me so
I could speak to him
whenever I wanted to.
He gave me the
opportunity to speak
quite informally.
He helped me make
decisions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpBL6IO54RY
52. “But the one sort of big area I reckon you could improve would be to have like a central
knowledge exchange or database, kind of like a website essentially where …you could
have information, again about how to be a good mentor, what to expect from the
mentee’s point of view and perhaps you could have things on there like….
Mentee and mentor participation in the
specification for the website/ “tool-kit”
57. Municipal Expert Panel of the Institute of Civil
Engineers, project on e-mentoring:
“Passing knowledge and experience to a new
generation of municipal practitioners”.
58. Dr Andrea Wheeler
Teaching and Learning Co-ordinator (Projects),
The Centre for Engineering & Design Education
a.s.wheeler@lboro.ac.uk
59.
60. Dr Andrea Wheeler, Dr Paul Rowley, Martin Hamilton
An Innovative Knowledge Platform for Business and Community Engagement
A co-developed service model for online continuing professional development
in the energy sector
A CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL LEARNING
FRAMEWORK FOR ENERGY CPD:
MEGS-KT
62. The Problem
How to develop a relevant, up-to-date
desirable platform for “CFD”
opportunities, opening up University
resources and allowing SMEs to share
their knowledge.
63. Questionnaires and Interviews SMEs
• 10 paper filled questionnaire
• 18 online surveys
• 16 transcribed interviews
• 1 work shadow day (excellent data but too time
consuming)
• 3 planned “co-design” workshops
64. Building the MEGS-KT community of practice – the Jisc, the
fellows (the catalytic individuals) and SMEs team
Fellows Lecture Series
17/10/2012 Robin Nicholson, Edward Cullinan Architects
24/10/2012 Russell Smith, Parity Projects
14/11/2012 Terry McGivern, The Institute for Sustainability and the Flash
Programme
05/12/2012 John Davis, Domestic Green Deal Assessor
16/01/2012 Carl Benfield, Prescient Power
30/01/2012 Keyur Vadodaria, Researcher, CALEBRE project
20/02/2012 Rich Cartwright, RDC Energy , Jonathan Gilbert, The Rapid
technology Transfer Group, and Tracy Thomas
To ensure the sustainability of the project CEDE has agreed to fund the continued
development of the community and engagement with the demonstrator / website
through monthly evening lectures.
72. Barriers and limitations to this sort of
primary research
• Hard to engage SMEs
• SMEs don’t know what their knowledge needs
are (they don’t know what they don’t know)
• Professional bodies/networks limiting access
to SMEs by “outsiders” (difficult to send out
questionnaire via professional bodies)
• Concerns about sharing commercial
information from SMEs – “I prefer not to say”
CONTEXT:My paper describes the work of an HEA Departmental Grant with the School of Civil and Building Engineering. Problem: It addresses the question: can e-mentoring provide engineering and construction students – particularly those with an international perspective - with an educational opportunity which will significantly improve their employment opportunities? METHOD: Through narratives of mentees and mentors involved in the pilots this presentation explores notions of employability and internationalisation from their perspectives. It explores whether e-mentoring programmes offer a unique educational opportunity with benefits beyond simple approaches to employability: and argues that student led they offer a space for students to make good decisions, discover the career they want, and moreover start to live the lives they value. SOLUTION: Plan to sustain the programme and tool-kit for other Universities to deliver this e-mentoring approachIMPACT: real benefits to students – networks – introductions – cv and interview skills
O’Neil et al (1996) describe e-mentoring as the “…use of e-mail or computer conferencing systems to support a mentoring relationship when face to face relationships would be impractical.” Single and Muller (2001) state “e-mentoring is a computer mediated relationship between a senior individual, who is the mentor, and a lesser skilled protégé with the goal of developing the protégé.” Bierema and Merriam (2002) further define e-mentoring as: “A computer mediated, mutually beneficial relationship between a mentor and a protégé which provides learning, advising, encouraging, promoting and modelling, that is boundaryless, egalitarian and qualitatively different than traditional face to face mentoring.” This definition is a development of Zey’s (1984) mentoring definition, with the addition of the belief that a computer mediated relationship is one that is characterised by a boundarylessness and egalitarianism. All build upon an understandings of “traditional” or face-to-face mentoring. Each implies that e-mentoring still provides the same functions as mentoring, but that by using technological communication medium relationships have different characteristics and promote additional benefits. Mentors engaged in both pilots described these benefits in terms of ease and immediacy: email responses to mentee questions could be “rattled-off” in work time whilst face-to-face meetings required planning and preparation.
…The internet’s potential for supporting programs that address social justice and educational equity was recognized as early as the mid-1990s. Like mentoring programs, e-mentoring programs arguably have the potential to “‘level the playing-field’ by providing mentoring opportunities for those who otherwise would be left out of important informal networks”. It is thus not surprising that many of the earliest e-mentoring programs focused on creating educational and professional opportunities for underprivileged or underrepresented populations.
Kiesler (1993) suggests that markers of social status are less visible in e-mentoring dyads, rendering them less important to the overall exchange: traditional powers being eroded by the lack of visual cues that can lead to or reinforce bias and stereotypes based on demographic or status differences. Impartial advice was also seen as an advantage in e-mentoring studies because mentors are usually from completely different organisations so have less vested interest in the mentees’ activities. Single & Single (2007) for example, found that online mentoring participants cited that impartial advice was one of the most valuable attributes and facilitated a good foundation for relationship building leading to informational, psychosocial and instrumental benefits.
Within this context.
Engagement with employers. The Government White Paper Higher Education: Students at the heart of the system (BIS, 2011) states the need for employer engagement and similarly the Wilson Review (Wilson, ed., 2009) recommends that Universities work more with employers. The new graduate engineer needs new skills. The Royal Academy of Engineering (RAE) 2010 report Engineering Graduates for Industry states businesses have also stressed the new and distinct roles engineers now play in businesses: ‘…the technical specialist imbued with expert knowledge; …the integrator.. operating across boundaries in complex environments; and ... the change agent providing the creativity, innovation and leadership necessary to meet new challenges’ (RAE, 2007).
Graduates from some ethnic backgrounds still find it more difficult to gain employment compared to the ethnic majority and some other ethnic groups. Graduates with disabilities are equally disadvantaged and despite legislation for women, pay differentials in favour of males are commonplace for early career graduates. Parental socio-economic status has also been found to influence employment statistics. These inequalities remain unchanged in relation to salary differential and career prospects, despite greater equalities legislation. However, mentoring has a history of providing strategies to overcome the implications of underrepresentation within higher education. Even within an increasingly globalised higher education context, international students can lack the ability to make correct attributions about the cultural values, beliefs and behaviours and norms of the new society. Using their own culture as a standard for interpreting, judging and behaving in a new culture can result in difficultly within social situations. This is particularly acute within the employment context and students may need opportunities for cultural learning and cultural adjustment.Neal (2007), writing from within the context of U.S. colleges and universities, argues that it is white mentees, mentored by non-white academics, that have the most to learn; white mentors often need to develop a greater cross-cultural competence when dealing with international students, in particular. This, she argues “…goes beyond the traditional mentoring formats to consider other aspects involved in adjusting to different cultural systems and norms”. Neal also recognises that gender is identified as a difficulty for some mentors. She cites the work of theorists Carol Gilligan and Nancy Chodorow to support mentors’ identification of gender differences in communication styles. She cites the reflections of a male mentor stating: “I need to be particularly careful in mentoring women to be cognisant of their boundaries […] not intrude in ways that can be misinterpreted…as a straight white man, those kinds of boundaries are easier to work out with men than with women”. In addition, and perhaps more problematically, she cites another mentor Ross: “What I find for the most part is that men are socialized to pursue things fairly directly and linearly, and women are…socialized to be perhaps more holistic in their approach to issues or problems or matters of concern”15. Nevertheless, an unsophisticated awareness, or indeed overemphasis on differential treatment, could lead to stereotyping of interests, skills and career goals as Neal rightly states - whether in the context of gender, disability, race or ethnicity. There is a sbalance to be achieved in any mentoring relationship between trust, mutual respect, recognition of difference and personal growth.Identifying the skills to achieve this balance, as mentor or mentee, nevertheless presents a challenge. Moreover, Bird et al (1999) argue that cultural dimensions are necessary but not sufficient tools for making sense of complex behaviour within another culture. The danger of making these dimensions in a stereotypical manner is great and using these dimensions in a stereotypical manner prevents both partners seeing and understanding needs that do not fit the stereotype. Mentees or mentors may well behave in unexpected stereotypical ways which may not necessarily signal failure of a mentor-mentee relationship15. Bird et al, writing in a management training context, describe at least three factors which determine a person’s willingness to adapt to another culture and continue to higher levels of inter-cultural competence:High self-efficacy, which allows a person to see the expatriate experience as an adventure rather than a nightmare.Perceiving the purpose of the overseas assignment as a growth and development opportunity versus just another rung on the ladder.A focus on the intrinsic rewards of living overseas, which motivates them to continue learning, versus an expedient focus in which expatriates just learn enough to get by. These factors could be easily translated into “top tips” for mentors of international students and for mentees as well; yet this this still avoids the more complex question about the nature of the mentoring relationship. For international mentees, wanting to learn about the UK work environment, or indeed mentors wanting to mentor international students, good advice might be to progress slowly, making tentative hypotheses, modifying this as more information and experience is gathered. In this way, by continually refining categories and knowledge of the other culture cultural stereotypes can be avoided17. However, the unique mentoring relationship can provide much more than general advice determined through observation and analysis of individual mentor-mentee relationships due to the unique personal engagement offered.The growth of the global marketplace, and the need for competitive advantage, has meant that managers in industry will increasingly be called upon to balance tensions between local, regional and global market interests with an increased need for cooperation beyond traditional borders. Intercultural competence will play an increasingly important role in the skills necessary for an engineering graduate. The benefit of mentoring an international student therefore has an increasing significance for the development of the mentor as well as the mentee. Stanek (2001) describes mentoring programmes with these goals as “global mentoring”. She argues that “Good mentors can recognize skills that have atrophied and help reverse habits [and] Protégés who benefit the most from programmes seem to be those who are willing to reinvent themselves to keep pace with change…”. She also describes a self-selection of personality type amongst both mentors and mentees with both generally being very inquisitive, open to making mistakes and enjoying puzzles and learning. She writes: “They also feel the need to connect with others and to be a part of the larger picture”, suggesting an outgoing extrovert character18. Stanek sees global mentoring as helping to bridge information gaps, and reducing xenophobia and ethnocentricity where cross-cultural training is not otherwise available.Muller, 1997, Stanek, 2001Single et al, 2005Bierema & Merriam, 2002Blasko et al. 2002Blasko et al. 2002; Panel on Fair Access to the Professions 2009AGCAS 2007Panel on Fair Access to the Professions, 2009Chapdelain and Alexitch, 2004Neal, 2007, 2Neal, 2007, 3Bird et al, 1999, 163Bird et al, 164Stanek, 2001, 70Stanek, 2001, 71ext about employability
The growing internationalisation of HE adds a complexity to the problems of employability – address both employability and internationalisation were the theme of the research project. The problem of internationalisation in HE, as cited within literature is a rather fluid concept but also problematic. It may refer to very different problems: “Intercultural competence”, the ability to communicate those working in or from different cultures – free from prejudice and motivated to continued learning: "A set of cognitive, behavioural, and affective/motivational components that enable individuals to adapt effectively in intercultural environments.“ “Transnational education”, or equally the “Bologna process” and its potential for student mobility.
As a result of the literature review.
In both pilot schemes above and beyond employability or intercultural competence, mentees have reported (to various degrees) career development, psychosocial, coaching, networking, and in some cases, role modelling. In pilot scheme 2, work levels of PhD and Masters students was quoted as a reason for poor mentoring as they weren’t able to commit sufficient time to the scheme; this was highlighted by 2 of the 11 mentors interviewed. the general consensus was the more parallel educational and career paths were, the more the mentoring pair perceived their match as a success. All mentoring pairs who explored communication technologies but didn’t have regular contact showed some heightened relationship levels but not to the levels of mentoring pairs with regular contact. In terms of technology use there was no general consensus as to which method was better for facilitating an e-mentoring scheme. During pilot scheme 1 an international student reported finding it hard to break the ice in the questionnaire but when interviewed 2 months later reported having a close and meaningful relationship; this was backed up with a dramatic increase in communication and a change in communication technique. A handful of mentees reported not feeling comfortable asking probing questions of their mentor even at the end of the e-mentoring scheme, but a lot of mentoring pairs built very close relationships and have continued the mentoring outside of the Loughborough programme.
In both pilot schemes above and beyond employability or intercultural competence, mentees have reported (to various degrees) career development, psychosocial, coaching, networking, and in some cases, role modelling. In pilot scheme 2, work levels of PhD and Masters students was quoted as a reason for poor mentoring as they weren’t able to commit sufficient time to the scheme; this was highlighted by 2 of the 11 mentors interviewed. the general consensus was the more parallel educational and career paths were, the more the mentoring pair perceived their match as a success. All mentoring pairs who explored communication technologies but didn’t have regular contact showed some heightened relationship levels but not to the levels of mentoring pairs with regular contact. In terms of technology use there was no general consensus as to which method was better for facilitating an e-mentoring scheme. During pilot scheme 1 an international student reported finding it hard to break the ice in the questionnaire but when interviewed 2 months later reported having a close and meaningful relationship; this was backed up with a dramatic increase in communication and a change in communication technique. A handful of mentees reported not feeling comfortable asking probing questions of their mentor even at the end of the e-mentoring scheme, but a lot of mentoring pairs built very close relationships and have continued the mentoring outside of the Loughborough programme.
Employment statistics demonstrate a decrease in graduate employment and moreover illustrate how graduates are increasingly likely to take jobs that do not require a degree qualification spending many months or even years looking for a graduate opportunity after graduation. E-mentoring provides an opportunity for mentees to discover the skills they may need in a rapidly changing work context.
For international students the e-mentoring experience gives space to come to terms with different working practices and working cultures. This was particularly important, for one mentee in comparing UK and Ugandan context. The development of intercultural competences within the mentoring relationship is a mutually beneficial for mentee and mentors alike. Mentors also have the opportunity to build upon their knowledge and skills which are highly beneficial in an increasingly international marketplace.
The e-mentoring experience provides a unique time and place for mentee to think about employability. A time and place to be able to discuss with someone experienced in their field not only the practical skills that may help them find a job but in the tailored personalised and individual relationship, to explore they might begin to live the lives they value. This a less limiting definition of employability illuminates the unique benefit of e-mentoring for employability. E-mentoring gives students the opportunity to discover with the mentor the sorts of working lives they would like and moreover to identify aims and make decisions that will allow them to achieve,.
… you could end up with things like, from a mentee’s point of view it might be quite good to go on there and see, have like a ‘my story’ section so all the mentors could just do a short summary of how they got to where they are now so they’ve got an idea of what kind of things graduates go into and the fields that they’re going into and what they’ve done. Equally I think, and I think it’s important to have that sort of individual one to one but there were, I’m sure there are a lot of topics that were covered, that came up amongst all the partnerships that you put together, so to have maybe sort of .. I’m trying to think what’s the best way to call it, like a questions and answers page, so something that’s quite a general question like for example, I’m applying to Atkins for example, does anyone know anything about the process? Well you might find that you’ve got mentors who work for Atkins, equally mentees who are also doing that and they might be able to offer advice and some ideas, which you’re getting more opinions on a question that’s quite good to get more opinions on if you see what I mean. [...] Yes, like a networking group because obviously there’s a lot of things that you sort of discuss that you wouldn’t want to put out to the world and ask everybody, it might be quite personal but then again there are other things that you might want opinions on that would be worthwhile to try and get a few people on something that … But you could have, so to have that central website that all of you go on to and have a look at and it would allow you guys to put stuff up there as organisers of the scheme, put things up there about any information you might think we’d be interested in and that would be appropriate and all sorts whereas it seemed to be we had the opening meeting, which was brilliant, there you go, you’re in your pair, we went off and did our thing and then we came back at the end to have a chat and see how it all went, whereas to have that central thing equally …”