My second presentation of graduation studio. It explains the analyses and spatial planning on the city scale, as well as the next step on design intervention on harbour area.
Kala jadu for love marriage | Real amil baba | Famous amil baba | kala jadu n...
P2 presentation
1. Road to SCHEVENINGEN
towards a sustainable tourism destination
P2 Presentation by
Amy Ikha Yanti Santoso (4120663)
Delta Intervention Studio
26 Januari 2012
2. The aims of this project are:
1. Designing new public transport scenarios in The Hague, to
Scheveningen and other local tourism destinations, in order to
encourage a shift from private car to public transport use.
2. Designing a mixed-use development in Scheveningen Harbour,
with a purpose of enhancing its place distinctiveness, attracting
more investments and activities in the area.
3. CONTENTS
of this presentation are:
1. Introduction
2. Problem statement
3. Project aims
4. Research questions
5. Methodology
6. Analysis
7. Case studies
8. The Hague’s spatial planning
9. Spatial planning assessment
10. Existing plan in Scheveningen Haven
11. Harbour development theoretical framework
12. Scheveningen Harbour master plan
13. Master plan assessment
14. Spatial planning and master plan assessment
15. The next step
4. INTRO
DUCTION tourism area life cycle (Butler, 1980)
NUMBER OF
TOURISTS
rejuvenation
A
CRITICAL RANGE stagnation B
OF ELEMENTS C
D
OF CAPACITY consolidation
decline
development SCHEVENINGEN
involvement
exploration
TIME
A tourism area needs to be rejuvenated or else, it will decline..
5. INTRO
DUCTION sustainable tourism & accessibility
“Tourism is one of the MOST SIGNIFICANT SECTORS in present world economy.
It also has extensive effects on the destinations and host communities, in spatial,
economic, social and environmental aspects. Because of that, there is A NEED
to ensure its long-term SUSTAINABILITY, preserving not only its ability for
generating capitals, but also its spatial, social, cultural or environmental assets,
which contribute to its success.
In that case, sustainability principles refer to HARMONIOUS relationships among
environmental, economic and socio-cultural aspects of tourism development, in
order to guarantee its long-term maintenance.
ACCESSIBILITY and mobility influence the success of a tourist destination.
Car is one of the most used transport mode for tourism, yet it is very
environmentally-unfriendly. Because of that, sustainable tourism development
needs an environmentally-friendly transport planning, where A SHIFT TO PUBLIC
TRANSPORT from car-use is encouraged.”
(World Tourism Organizations, 2004)
6. PROBLEM
STATEMENT tourists’ high use of car
In 2007, 49% of Scheveningen’s tourists
used car, while only 34% used
public transports. It causes pollutions,
congestions and nuisance from angry
drivers.
7. longer travelling time by public transport
0 1 4 km
compared to car from The Hague
0 - 10 minutes
11 - 20 minutes
to Scheveningen
21 - 30 minutes
1
31 - 40 minutes
5
41 - 50 minutes 3
51 - 60 minutes
more than 60 minutes
2 17
4
6 26
16 21
7
8
15 31
20 25
9 14
24
19
10 30 33
23 38
32
22 29
11 13
18 28 37
27
36
12 34
39
35
8. 0 500 2000 m
traffic problem and low
Area with Traffic Problem
Area with Empty Space
spatial quality in the harbour
Area which Connection to Water can be Strengthened
A
A
B
B
9. PROJECT
AIMS encourage a shift from car to public transport
HOW?
A shift is most likely to happen when:
1. public transport frequency is six times per
hour (Rutten, 2010)
2. there is a faster public transport with
better service quality (World Tourism
Organization, 2004)
10. PROJECT
AIMS new public transport scenario in The Hague
Bus Rapid Transit Light Rapid Transit Metro/Rail Rapid Transit
specification
(BRT) (LRT) (RRT)
Right-of-Way
11 m
7.5 m 8m
Investment cost
5 - 40 million $/km 10 - 50 million $/km 40 - 100 million $/km
per pairs of lanes
Capacity per
75 - 200 ppl (1 cart) 120 - 600 ppl (1 - 4 cart) 140 - 2400 ppl (1 - 10 cart)
Transit Unit and vehicle
Speed 70 - 90 km/h 60 - 100 km/h 80 - 100 km/h
Terminal 500 - 800 m 500 - 1000 m 500 - 2000 m
Lane-width (one-way) 3.65 - 3.75 m 3.40 - 3.60 m 3.70 - 4.30 m
11. PROJECT
AIMS accommodating future transport needs
E W N T!
ME
N OP
BAD
L
E VE
two theatres parking garage
D
horeca high-rise apartment
family entertainment small theatre
wellness facilities social housing
budget hotel & office five-star hotel
design hotel & apartment small houses
parking garage parking area
HAVEN
new programs will
680-920 houses two hotels
6,200 m2 commercial functions 4,000 m2 offices
encourage stable flow of
two museums 7,200 m2 fish-related leisure passengers throughout the
23,000 m2 fisheries 7,200 m2 beach leisure days and seasons
12. PROJECT
AIMS 2x current passenger number and 3x faster
In order to encourage a shift from car-use, public
transport should provide better service and faster
travelling time compared to car.
Presently, car is 2x faster than public transport, so:
PRESENT
peak day 14,500 people average travelling time
peak hour 4,930 people by public transport 30 minutes
FUTURE
peak day 29,000 people average travelling time
peak hour 9,860 people by public transport 10 minutes
13. PROJECT
AIMS harbour’s mixed-use and tourism-oriented development
WHY ? mixed-
use and
tourism-
oriented
“Mixed-uses and leisure activities are key factors of urban water
redevelopment schemes.”
(Tunbridge & Ashworth, 1992; Falk, 1992)
“Tourism-oriented development generates positive influences
in urban regeneration. It can be the catalyst of radical changes
in economy, social and physical aspects of a city in transition.”
(Owen, 1990)
14. PROJECT
AIMS harbour’s development type
NORMAL TYPE
If no anchor development is proposed, just a
normal growth of the area.
CRUISE PASSENGER TERMINAL
Just as proposed in the municipality’s plan. Is
it the right one for Scheveningen Harbour?
ARTS & CULTURE
Following The Hague’s vision to be a cultural city, is
Scheveningen suitable to be part of the scheme?
HARBOUR-ORIENTED
Apart from the existing plans and schemes, can
Scheveningen develop its own unique character?
17. RESEARCH
QUESTIONS new public transport scenario
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Light Rapid Transit (LRT) or Rail Rapid Transit (RRT)?
Which scenario provides the shortest travelling time from The Hague to Scheveningen, which
maintains most of the present urban condition, while producing the least negative impacts on
physical, social, economic and environmental aspects?
1. Which scenario provides the shortest travelling time?
2. Which scenario has maintains most of the present urban condition?
3. How are they spatially implemented?
4. Which scenario produces the least negative impacts on physical, social, economic and
environmental aspects?
5. Which scenario is the cheapest one to implement?
6. Considering its speed, cost, as well as physical, social, economic and environmental impacts,
which scenario is the most suitable one for The Hague and Scheveningen?
18. RESEARCH
QUESTIONS Scheveningen Harbour development
Normal-type, cruise passenger terminal, arts & culture or harbour-related oriented?
Which scenario is the most suitable one for Scheveningen Harbour, in order to enhance its
attractiveness, place distinctiveness and generate vibrant urban life in the area?
1. Which scenario enhances Scheveningen Harbour’s place distinctiveness the most?
2. Which scenario generates the most vibrant urban life in the area?
3. Which scenario is the cheapest to implement?
4. What are the impact of each scenario on physical, social, economic and environmental aspects?
20. METHOD
OLOGY methods used
OTHER
JOUR-
N A L
ARTI-
CLES
new public transport
providing transport mode’s specifications, construction, impact, advantage
and disadvantages
harbour development
factors in project that generate positive impacts in harbour regeneration
21. METHOD
OLOGY methods used
There are two purposes of doing
case studies in this project. First,
to investigate Scheveningen’s
position among other Dutch
seaside resorts. Second, to seek
inspiration and guidance of
integrating new public transport
line to harbour development.
Dutch seaside resorts
Scheveningen’s identity as a Dutch seaside
resort
22. METHOD
OLOGYmethods used
Barceloneta, Barcelona
The integration of BRT and normal type
development in Barceloneta harbour
Harbourside, Bristol
The integration of LRT and arts and culture
development in Harbourside
23. METHOD
OLOGY methods used
Site survey
BLANK Investigate the spatial quality of Scheveningen Harbour
WA L L S area to support analysis and design of master plan
EMPTY
SPACES
ATELIER TRAF COAST L O
KUST F I C A L C A L
K WA L I E N G I E N G I R E S I
T E I T NEER NEER DENT
Interview with experts
Quick overview on coastal development, engineering and local’s perception
in Scheveningen, as well as traffic design in The Hague
24. METHOD
OLOGY methods used
Analysis
Route from Den Haag to Scheveningen
Shopping street
House price
Income
Crime rate
Road structure
A N A LY
Public transport network SES ARE
Centralities Building age USED TO
Tourism-oriented program
Resident-oriented program
PROVIDE
Tourism destination Sedimentation DESIGN
CONSIDE
Space Syntax R AT I O N
Scheveningen
A N D
Radius 30
Topological centralities
GUIDE
Radius 3
LINES
Local scale Global scale
25. METHOD
OLOGYmethods used
back and forth between research and design
to improve product’s quality
26. METHOD
OLOGY answering the questions
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Light Rapid Transit (LRT) or Rail Rapid Transit (RRT)?
Which scenario provides the shortest travelling time from The Hague to Scheveningen, which
maintains most of the present urban condition, while producing the least negative impacts on
physical, social, economic and environmental aspects?
Answer:
27. METHOD
OLOGY answering the questions
Normal-type, cruise passenger terminal, arts & culture or harbour-related oriented?
Which scenario is the most suitable one for Scheveningen Harbour, in order to enhance its
attractiveness, place distinctiveness and generate vibrant urban life in the area?
Answer:
28. ANALYSIS
0 1 4 km
Shop
Bar tourist-oriented program
Restaurant
Hotel in The Hague
Museum
Monument
Parking Area
29. ANALYSIS
0 1 4 km
International Zone
Museum Area centralities in The Hague
Shopping Street
30. ANALYSIS
0 1 4 km
Scheveningen Boulevard
Scheveningen Village tourism destinations in The Hague
Scheveningen Harbour
City Centre
Museum Area
Madurodam
Kijkduin
IT SAYS: potential destinations in the new transport system
31. ANALYSIS
0 1 4 km
Railway
Highway transport network in The Hague
Tram Line
Bus Line
32. ANALYSIS
0 1 4 km
Car Route to Scheveningen
Bus 22 Route to Scheveningen transport route to Scheveningen
Tram 1 Route to Scheveningen
Tram 9 Route to Scheveningen
Tram 11 Route to Scheveningen
Tram 15 Route to Scheveningen
IT SAYS: the probable and preferrable route for BRT, LRT and RRT
33. CONCLUSION
0 1 4 km
Destinations
Preferred BRT route BRT design guidelines
Possible BRT route
Boulevard
Village
Madurodam
Harbour
Museum Kwartier
City Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
Kijkduin
IT SAYS: the destinations and preferrable route for BRT using existing bus line
34. CONCLUSION
0 1 4 km
Destinations
Preferred LRT route LRT design guidelines
Possible LRT route
Boulevard
Village
Madurodam
Harbour
Museum Kwartier
City Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
Kijkduin
IT SAYS: the destinations and preferrable route for LRT using existing tram line
35. CONCLUSION
0 1 4 km
Destinations
Preferred RRT route
BRT RRT design guidelines
Possible BRT route
Boulevard
Village
Madurodam
Harbour
Museum Kwartier
City Centre
Central Station
Hollands Spoor
Kijkduin
IT SAYS: the destinations and preferrable route for RRT in consideration of space availability
36. 0 500 2000 m
ANALYSIS
Shop
Bar
tourist-oriented program
Restaurant
Hotel
in Scheveningen
Museum
Monument
Parking Area
37. 0 500 2000 m
ANALYSIS
Centralities (Public Program Concentration)
centralities in Scheveningen
IT SAYS: shopping street and leisure programs are lesser in the harbour area
CHANCE OF: adding more shopping and leisure programs
38. 0 500 2000 m
ANALYSIS
School
Sport Facility
resident-oriented program
Industry and Office
Healthcare Facility
in Scheveningen
IT SAYS: the harbour area is dominated with industrial and office programs
CHANCE OF: replacing them with more public-engaging programs
39. 0 500 2000 m
ANALYSIS
house price and income
in Scheveningen (www.cbsinuwbuurt.nl)
OOSTDUINEN
House Price Not Available
Income Not Available
SCHEVENINGEN BADPLAATS
BELGISCH PARK
House Price 264,000 Euro
House Price 348,000 Euro
Income 22,100 Euro
Income 23,800 Euro
RIJSLAG
House Price 326,000 Euro
DUTTENDEL
Income 22,000 Euro
OUD SCHEVENINGEN
House Price 687,000 Euro
House Price 201,000 Euro WESTBROEKPARK Income 46,200 Euro
IT SAYS: harbour
Income 16,700 Euro
VISSERIJBUURT House Price 638,000 Euro
House Price 249,000 Euro Income 44,700 Euro
Income 18,700 Euro
area has the second
STATENKWARTIER
VAN STOLKPARK
EN SCHEVENINGSE BOSJES
lowest house price
VISSERSHAVEN
House Price
Income
468,000 Euro
30,200 Euro
House Price 600,000 Euro and income in
Scheveningen
Income 32,700 Euro
House Price 207,000 Euro
Income 17,300 Euro
ZORGVLIET
House Price 555,000 Euro
CHANCE OF:
GEUZENKWARTIER
Income 34,900 Euro
House Price 232,000 Euro
DUINDORP
Income 18,900 Euro
STADHOUDERSPLANTSOEN
incorporating high-
House Price
Income
143,000 Euro
15,800 Euro
House Price 277,000 Euro
SWEELINCKPLEIN EN OMGEVING
end housings and
Income 38,800 Euro
House Price 363,000 Euro apartments in the
Income 45,600 Euro
harbour area
40. 0 500 2000 m
ANALYSIS
crime in Scheveningen
(www. politie.nl)
BELGISCH PARK
6 Threat
28 Car & Bike Theft
26 House & Company Theft OOSTDUINEN
15 Mistreatment 1 Threat
4 Mugging 5 Car & Bike Theft
50 Destruction 3 House & Company Theft
169 Total Number of Crime 4 Mistreatment
0 Mugging
SCHEVENINGEN
10 Destruction
37 Threat 23 Total Number of Crime
136 Car & Bike Theft
112 House & Company Theft WESTBROEKPARK EN DUTTENDEL
67 Mistreatment 2 Threat
9 Mugging 14 Car & Bike Theft
197 Destruction 28 House & Company Theft
558 Total Number of Crime VAN STOLKPARK EN
SCHEVENINGSE BOSJES 4 Mistreatment
1 Threat
1
11
Mugging
Destruction
IT SAYS: harbour
GEUZEN- EN STATENKWARTIER
11
2
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
60 Total Number of Crime
area has the
highest crime rate
12 Threat 3 Mistreatment
91 Car & Bike Theft 1 Mugging
in Scheveningen
84 House & Company Theft 4 Destruction
7 Mistreatment 22 Total Number of Crime
2 Mugging
67 Destruction
DUINDORP
11 Threat
263 Total Number of Crime
4
ZORGVLIET
Threat
MIGHT BE: publicly
30
21
Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
DUINOORD
12
7 Car & Bike Theft
House & Company Theft
unsupervised area
11
0
Mistreatment
Mugging
9
62
Threat
Car & Bike Theft
3
2
Mistreatment
Mugging
creates a chance
30
103
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
52
11
House & Company Theft
Mistreatment
20
48
Destruction
Total Number of Crime
for crime to take
place
4 Mugging
39 Destruction
177 Total Number of Crime
41. 0 500 2000 m
SPACE SYNTAX
High Street Integration
local topological R3 centralities
Low Street Integration
IT SAYS: the more integrated a street is, the more possible it is to be an economic centre
CHANCE OF: increasing street integration to condition a creation of economic centre
MIGHT BE: low street integration contributes to high crime rate in the harbour
42. 0 500 2000 m
SPACE SYNTAX
High Street Integration
global topological R30 centralities
Low Street Integration
IT SAYS: in global scale, the harbour area is quite well-connected
CHANCE OF: providing high accessibility to harbour’s waterfront in global scale
43. 0 500 2000 m
ANALYSIS
North Sea Main Stream Direction
Stream Direction in Detail
sedimentation in Scheveningen
Sedimented Area in the Future
IT SAYS: sedimentation process creates new land surrounding harbour area
CHANCE OF: potential new development area surrounding the harbour
44. CONCLUSION
Scheveningen Harbour design strategy
1. new road
development
2. improving
connection
to improve to water and
accessibility to activating
waterfront from waterfront urban
surrounding area life by injecting
more leisure
programs
3. filling in the empty
spaces with new
4. proposing high-
end housings and
programs and apartments to
activities enhance prestige
of the area
45. CASE
STUDIES Dutch seaside resorts (Kwakman, 2010)
46. CASE
STUDIES Dutch seaside resorts (Kwakman, 2010)
47. CASE
STUDIES Dutch seaside resorts conclusion
Compared to other Dutch seaside resorts,
Scheveningen is:
1. superior in facilities and activities it offers to tourists.
2. potential in developing its Hollands Classics character,
with its distinctive Scheveningen Village.
3. potential in developing its Good Life character, with
new development in the harbour.
4. potential in creating another type of tourism, Haven
Leven, where all fishing, harbour activities are showcased
to tourists, along with water sports and extended nightlife.
48. CASE
STUDIES Barceloneta, Barcelona
Barceloneta is one of the
most popular beaches in
Barcelona
Although the harbour areae
is mostly converted to yacht
marina, there are still some
industrial zones left in the area.
BRT lines provide direct access
to the beach. In order to
achieve shorter travelling time,
City Centre
Harbour Area
the stops are located further
Barceloneta Village
Yacht Marina
than before.
Industrial Area
Road
BRT Line
0 500 2000 m
49. CASE
STUDIES Harbourside, Bristol
Harbourside is the new
cultural and leisure center
of Bristol
Development of cultural
programs and a public square
activate the urban life in
Harbourside.
LRT line doesn’t cross the
Harbourside, but provide a
direct connection to the area,
City Centre
Harbour Area
along with Bristol’s city centre.
Millenium Square
Animation Center
Aquarium
Amphitheatre
Road
LRT Line
0 200 800 m
50. SPATIAL PLANNING
0 1 4 km
Main Stops
Other Stops Light Rapid Transit (LRT) option 1
LRT Line
Boulevard
Village
Harbour
Museum Kwartier
Central Station
City Centre
Hollands Spoor
cost
new elevated destination
track
new on-ground new underground
track track
total track altered current
track
P+R to
Boulevard
51. SPATIAL PLANNING
0 1 4 km
Main Stops
Other Stops Light Rapid Transit (LRT) option 2
LRT Line
Boulevard
Village
Madurodam
Harbour
Museum Kwartier
Central Station
City Centre
Hollands Spoor
Kijkduin
cost
new elevated destination
track
new on-ground new underground
track track
total track altered current
track
P+R to
Boulevard
52. SPATIAL PLANNING
0 1 4 km
Main Stops
Other Stops Metro/Rail Rapid Transit (RRT) option 1
RRT Line On-Ground
RRT Line Underground Boulevard
Village
Harbour
Museum Kwartier
Central Station
City Centre
Hollands Spoor
P+R
cost
new elevated destination
track
new on-ground new underground
track track
total track altered current
track
P+R to
Boulevard
53. SPATIAL PLANNING
0 1 4 km
Main Stops
Other Stops
Boulevard
Metro/Rail Rapid Transit (RRT) option 2
RRT Line On-Ground
RRT Line Underground
Village
Harbour
Central Station / City Centre
Hollands Spoor
Kijkduin
P+R
cost
new elevated destination
track
new on-ground new underground
track track
total track altered current
track
P+R to
Boulevard
54. SPATIAL PLANNING
0 1 4 km
Main Stops
Other Stops Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
LRT Line
BRT Line Boulevard + Light Rapid Transit (LRT) option 1
Village
Harbour
Museum Kwartier
Central Station
City Centre
Hollands Spoor
Kijkduin
cost
new elevated destination
track
new on-ground new underground
track track
total track altered current
track
P+R to
Boulevard
55. SPATIAL PLANNING
0 1 4 km
Main Stops
Other Stops Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
LRT Line
BRT Line Boulevard + Light Rapid Transit (LRT) option 2
Village
Madurodam
Harbour
Museum Kwartier
Central Station
City Centre
Hollands Spoor
Kijkduin
cost
new elevated destination
track
new on-ground new underground
track track
total track altered current
track
P+R to
Boulevard
56. SPATIAL PLANNING
0 1 4 km
Main Stops
Other Stops Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) option 3
RRT Line On-Ground
RRT Line Underground Boulevard + Rail Rapid Transit (RRT)
BRT Line
Village
Harbour
Museum Kwartier
Central Station
City Centre
Hollands Spoor
Kijkduin
P+R
cost
new elevated destination
track
new on-ground new underground
track track
total track altered current
track
P+R to
Boulevard
57. ASSESS
MENT new public transport in The Hague
cost P+R to Boulevard number of total track length
spatial planning (million $) (minute) tourism destinations (km)
LRT option 1 324 8.1 8 10.85
LRT option 2 489.5 5.7 10 16.3
RRT option 1 1,500 7.3 8 11.1
RRT option 2 1,260 6.7 8 18
BRT option 1 430.54 8.1 9 15.6
BRT option 2 595.25 5.7 10 21
BRT option 3 1,600 6.7 9 15.9
58. ASSESS
MENT new public transport in The Hague
current track on-ground new track elevated new track underground new
spatial planning alteration (km) (km) (km) track (km)
LRT option 1 10.85
LRT option 2 16.3
RRT option 1 4.5 6.6
RRT option 2 15.8 2.2
BRT option 1 0.6 4.1
BRT option 2 0.6 4.1
BRT option 3 4.8 4.5 6.6
59. SCHEVENINGEN
HARBOUR existing plan (The Hague municipality)
680-920 houses two hotels
6,200 m2 commercial functions 4,000 m2 offices
two museums 7,200 m2 fish-related leisure
23,000 m2 fisheries 7,200 m2 beach leisure
60. SCHEVENINGEN
HARBOUR critic on the existing plan
“Although the proposal covers all potential type of
developments, such as living, working, fishing, leisure
and culture, the programs are too generic. Thus, this
development doesn’t support creation of distinctive
place character.”
Thus, this project will address the need of distinctive
development plan in Scheveningen Harbour