This report examines the firm's ability to interpret new project ideas based on the information extracted from various financial formulas and perspectives. Please do not use any portion of this paper without properly referencing sources. Thank you
NO1 Certified Amil Baba In Lahore Kala Jadu In Lahore Best Amil In Lahore Ami...
Making Capital Budgeting Decisions
1. A Perspective on Making
A Perspective on Making Capital Budgeting Decisions
Alice Bell
BUS401: Principles of Finance
Instructor: P.Martin Fenlon
May 29, 2010
1
2. A Perspective on Making
Cash Flows in Capital Budgeting
Firms depend on fresh new ideas to increase shareholder value. These ideas are called
projects or investments. There can be many new investment opportunities for Firms. Firms need
to know which project or investment will produce the most benefits for the company. New ideas
are plenty but many organizations have special circumstances that could limit the success of the
new project or investment. Before choosing a new project or investment a firm must know if it
will be profitable for the company. Capital budgeting is a process of finding projects or
investments that are profitable for an organization by evaluating them in fixed assets (Keown,
Martin, Petty & Scott, 2008). The process of capital budgeting uses free cash flows to reveal the
benefits of a project or investment. Using capital budgeting to determine the profitability of a
project or investment is necessary and feasible to create optimal shareholder value. In this report
I will perform the duties of a financial analyst and use the capital budgeting process to determine
the free cash flows for Caledonia Products. I will examine a new project proposal that is a fad
project and is expected to last 5 years. I will use free cash flows and the results of the net present
value and internal rate of return to determine the profitability of the project for Caledonia
Products. I also will examine three different perspectives to measure project risks.
Caledonia Products should focus on cash flows rather than accounting profits to make
their capital budgeting decisions. To measure the profitability of a project free cash flows are
used instead of accounting profits. Accounting profits are reported when they are earned, but free
cash flows allow firms to determine when the money is received, when it can be invested and
when it has to be paid out (Keown, Martin, Petty & Scott, 2008).
2
3. A Perspective on Making
Caledonia Products should be interested in incremental after- tax cash flows when
determining the profitability of a project. “Depreciation is not a not a cash flow item, but it does
affect cash flows by lowing the level of profits on which taxes are calculated (p302)”. Sunk costs
are costs that have already occurred, and should not be included in the capital budgeting analysis
because they are not affected by the decision to accept or reject the project.
Alice Bell, BUS:401 May
29,2010
Chapter 10
Mini Case
DATA
Cost of plant and equipment
7,900,
000
Shipping and installation 100,000
Tax rate 34%
Required rate of return 15%
Sales Price per unit (yrs 1-4) 300
Sales Price per unit (yr 5) 260
Variable cost per unit 180
Annual fixed cost 200,000
Depreciation life 5
Section 1: Calculate EBIT
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Units Sold 70,000 120,000 140,000 80,000 60,000
Sales Revenue
21,000,0
00
36,000,
000
42,000,
000
24,000,0
00
15,600,0
00
Less: Variable Costs
12,600,0
00
21,600,
000
25,200,
000
14,400,0
00
10,800,0
00
3
5. A Perspective on Making
Section 4: Calculate Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
5,956,00
0
9,916,0
00
11,500,
000
6,748,00
0
3,580,00
0
Minus: Change in Net
Working Capital 100,000
2,000,00
0
1,500,0
00 600,000
(1,800,0
00)
(2,400,0
00)
Minus: Change in Capital
Spending 8,000,000 0 0 0 0 0
Free Cash Flow: (8,100,000)
3,956,00
0
8,416,0
00
10,900,
000
8,548,00
0
5,980,00
0
PV =
3,440,00
0
6,363,7
05
7,166,9
27
4,887,34
7
2,973,11
7
NPV 16,731,096
IRR= 77.02%
The initial outlay of Caledonia’s proposed project is $8,100,000. The differential cash flows
over the products life are $3,956,000 on year 1, $8,416,000 on year 2 $10,900,000 on year 3
$8,548,000 on year 4, and $5,980,000 on year 5. The terminal cash flow of the fad project is
$5,980,000 respectfully.
5
6. A Perspective on Making
Cash Flow Diagram for the Caledonia Products Project.
The project’s net present value is 16,731,096, and the project has an internal rate of return of
of 77.02%. In determining the profitability of a project, the net present value, and the internal
rate of return of the project is considered. “The net present value of an investment proposal is
equal to the present value of its annual free cash flows less the investment’s initial outlay
(Inflows)
(Outflows)
8,100,000
1 2 3 4 5
6
3,956,000 8,416,000 10,900,000 8,548,000 5,980,000
7. A Perspective on Making
(p262).” When the net present value of a project proposal is greater than or equal to zero, the
project should be accepted. In this case the project proposal for Caledonia Products is greater
than or equal to zero. “The internal rate of return is the discount rate that equates the present
value of the project’s free cash flows with the projects initial cash outlay (p269).” A project is
accepted if the internal rate of return is higher than the required rate of return. In this case the fad
project proposal for Caledonia Products should be accepted because the net present value is
greater than or equal to zero, and the internal rate of return is higher than the 15% required rate
of return.
In capital budgeting, risk can be measured from three perspectives. Those risk are project
standing alone risk, contribution to firm risk, and systematic risk. “Project standing risk ignores
the fact that most of the risk will be diversified away when the project is combined with other
projects and assets (p314.)” Contribute to firm risk is the amount of risk that the project
contributes as a whole, ignoring the effects of the diversification of the firm’s shareholders.
Systematic risk is the risk of the project from the view point of a well diversified shareholder
(Keown, Martin, Petty & Scott, 2008).
Using capital budgeting to determine the profitability of a project or investment is necessary
and feasible to create optimal shareholder value. To measure the profitability of the project
proposed to Caledonia their free cash flows should be used instead of their accounting profits.
When determining the profitability of a project using free cash flows the net present value and
the internal rate of return can be calculated. These calculations measure the profitability of a
project, and decide if the project should be accepted or rejected. In Caledonia case we see that
the project should be accepted. The decision to accept Caledonia’s fad project proposal would
create maximum wealth to its shareholders by creating more free cash flows for the organization.
7
9. A Perspective on Making
References
Keown, A., Martin, J., & Petty, J. (2008). Foundations of finance (6th
ed.). New York, New
York : Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780132339223.
9
10. A Perspective on Making
References
Keown, A., Martin, J., & Petty, J. (2008). Foundations of finance (6th
ed.). New York, New
York : Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780132339223.
9