SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Download to read offline
Chapter 31
Premature Rupture of the Membranes
                                                                                                                      Brian M. Mercer, MD




Rupture of the fetal membranes is an integral part of the normal par-        TIMP-1, TIMP-3), and increased poly[ADP-ribose]polymerase (PARP)
turition process at term and is inevitable in the process of preterm         cleavage.6,9 Term or preterm uterine contractions can also lead to mem-
birth. Spontaneous rupture of the membranes (SROM) at term and               brane rupture resulting from increased bursting pressure due to
preterm can occur any time before or after the onset of contractions.        increased intra-amniotic pressure and from “strain hardening” with
SROM before the onset of contractions is referred to as premature            repeated uterine contractions. If the fetal membranes do not rupture
rupture of the membranes (PROM). Membrane rupture at term                    before labor, the work to cause membrane rupture at the internal cervi-
usually occurs as a result of a physiologic process of progressive mem-      cal os decreases with advancing cervical dilatation because of the lack
brane weakening. Preterm PROM generally results from pathologic              of anchoring to the supportive decidua and enhanced ability to stretch
weakening of the fetal membranes, which has several causes. Although         with contractions.1
delivery after PROM may be required by the presence of advanced                  Preterm membrane rupture can arise through a number of path-
labor, intrauterine infection, vaginal bleeding due to placental abrup-      ways that ultimately result in accelerated membrane weakening. Bacte-
tion, or non-reassuring fetal status, the physician often needs to make      rial collagenases and proteases can directly cause fetal membrane tissue
the decision whether to actively pursue delivery or conservatively           weakening.10 An increase in local host cytokines or an imbalance in the
manage the pregnancy. Management of PROM hinges on knowledge                 interaction between MMPs and TIMPs in response to microbial colo-
of gestational age, the neonatal risks related to immediate delivery, and    nization can have similar effects.11 There is specific evidence linking
an understanding of the anticipated clinical course and relative risks       urogenital tract infection and colonization with preterm PROM.
of intrauterine infection, abruptio placentae, and fetal distress or death   Amniotic fluid cultures after PROM are frequently positive (25%
from umbilical cord accident or intrauterine infection with conserva-        to 35%),12-19 and histologic evaluation in the setting of preterm
tive management.                                                             birth frequently has demonstrated acute inflammation and bacterial
                                                                             contamination along the choriodecidual interface.20 Although these
                                                                             findings may reflect ascending infection after PROM, it is likely
                                                                             that ascending colonization and infection are directly involved in the
Physiology and                                                               pathogenesis of preterm PROM in many cases. Genital tract pathogens
                                                                             that have been associated with PROM include Neisseria gonorrhoeae,
Pathophysiology of                                                           Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, and group B β-hemo-
Membrane Rupture                                                             lytic streptococcus.20-26 Although group B streptococcus (GBS) bacte-
                                                                             riuria has been associated with preterm PROM and low-birth-weight
The fetal membranes consist of the amnion, which lines the amniotic          infants27 and an association between cervical colonization and preterm
cavity, and the thicker chorion, which adheres to the maternal decidua.      PROM is possible,28 it does not appear that vaginal GBS carriage is
Initially, the amnion and chorion are separate layers. The amnionic sac      associated with preterm PROM.29,30 Although there is a well-estab-
is visible on first trimester ultrasound scans until it fuses with the        lished association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth,
chorion by the end of the 14th week of gestation. Subsequently, the          including that related to preterm PROM,31,32 it remains unclear whether
amnion and chorion are connected by a collagen-rich connective tissue        bacterial vaginosis merely identifies women with a predisposition to
layer, with the amnion represented by a single cuboidal epithelial           abnormal genital tract colonization and inflammation, facilitates
amnion layer and subjacent compact and spongy connective tissue              ascent of other bacteria to the upper genital tract, or is directly patho-
layers, and a thicker chorion consisting of reticular and trophoblastic      genic and causative of membrane rupture. Physical effects related to
layers. Together, the amnion and chorion form a stronger unit than           preterm contractions and prolapsing membranes with premature cer-
either layer individually. Physiologic membrane remodeling occurs            vical dilatation can predispose the fetal membranes to rupture, as can
with advancing gestational age, reflecting changes in collagen content        the increased intrauterine pressure seen with polyhydramnios.4,33 It is
and type, changes in intercellular matrix, and progressive cellular apop-    likely that certain connective tissue disorders (e.g., Ehlers-Danlos syn-
tosis. These changes lead to structural weakening of the membranes,          drome) can result in intrinsic weakening of the membranes. Clinical
which is more evident in the region of the internal cervical os.1-8          associations with preterm PROM include low socioeconomic status,
    Membrane weakening can be stimulated by exposure to local                lean maternal body mass (<19.8 kg/m2), nutritional deficiencies (e.g.,
matrix metalloproteinases (e.g., MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9), decreased             copper, ascorbic acid), and prior cervical conization. During preg-
levels of membrane tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (e.g.,     nancy, maternal cigarette smoking, cervical cerclage, second- and
600      CHAPTER 31             Premature Rupture of the Membranes

third-trimester bleeding, pulmonary disease, prior episodes of preterm     ing result at 22 to 24 weeks had a one-in-six chance (16.7%) of
labor or contractions, and uterine overdistention with polyhydramnios      delivering a preterm infant because of PROM, and the combination
or multiple gestations have been linked to preterm PROM.4,33-45            of a prior preterm birth due to PROM, a short cervical length, and a
    Although one or more risk factors may lead to membrane rupture,        positive fetal fibronectin screening result increased the risk of delivery
the ultimate clinical cause of PROM is often not evident at delivery.      at less than 35 weeks because of preterm PROM by 10.9-fold (25%
In some cases, factors leading to membrane rupture are subacute or         versus 2.3%).46
chronic in nature. Women with a prior preterm birth have increased             Unfortunately, despite knowledge of a broad range of potential risk
risk for preterm birth due to PROM in subsequent pregnancies,              factors for preterm birth, we are able to predict only a small fraction
especially if the prior preterm delivery resulted from PROM.46 Asymp-      of women destined to deliver preterm, and most preterm births due to
tomatic women with a short cervical length (<25 mm) remote from            preterm labor or PROM occur in women considered to be at low risk
delivery are also at increased risk for subsequent preterm birth due to    for these events. Ancillary tests such as fetal fibronectin screening or
preterm labor or PROM. Some women may have polymorphisms for               transvaginal cervical sonography should be incorporated into routine
inflammatory proteins that alter their inflammatory response and             practice only after effective interventions to prevent PROM have been
increase the risk for preterm birth.47,48                                  identified for those with an abnormal test result. Because most cases
                                                                           of preterm PROM cannot be predicted or prevented, clinical efforts
                                                                           continue to be focused on evaluation and treatment of women who
Prediction and Prevention                                                  present with symptoms of preterm PROM.

Because PROM at term usually is part of the normal parturition
process, the focus of efforts has been on the prediction and prevention
of preterm birth caused by PROM. Prevention of preterm PROM
                                                                           Clinical Course
would be particularly appealing because labor and intrauterine infec-      PROM affects approximately 8% of pregnancies at term, and 95% of
tion or other complications necessitating delivery often ensue soon        these women will deliver within 28 hours of membrane rupture.54
after membrane rupture occurs. The optimal way to prevent complica-        Preterm PROM is also associated with brief latency from membrane
tions from preterm PROM is to prevent its occurrence. Potentially          rupture to delivery; delivery within 1 week is the most common
modifiable risk factors for preterm PROM include cigarette smoking,         outcome after preterm PROM at any gestational age. On average,
poor nutrition, urinary tract and sexually transmitted infections, acute   latency increases with decreasing gestational age at membrane rupture.
pulmonary diseases, and severe polyhydramnios.                             When PROM occurs before 34 weeks’ gestation, 93% of women will
    Other than treatment of infections, it is unknown whether correc-      deliver within 1 week, and 50% to 60% of those who are managed
tion of these factors can avert this complication. Although most other     conservatively will deliver within 1 week.55,56 With PROM near the
risk factors are fixed in that they cannot be removed or remedied in a      limit of viability, 60% to 70% deliver within 1 week, but 1 in 5 will
particular woman, knowledge of risk can help to counsel women about        have a latency of 4 or more weeks if they are managed conservatively.35
suspicious symptoms and the importance of timely evaluation if             Although the likelihood of spontaneous resealing of the membranes
preterm PROM occurs. Broad-based preventive strategies such as pro-        after preterm PROM is low (3% to 13%), the prognosis for those with
gesterone supplementation can be considered for those at risk due to       PROM occurring after amniocentesis is much better, with 86% to 94%
less specific risk factors such as a history of spontaneous preterm         resealing spontaneously.44,57,58 In a study of women with PROM after
birth49,50 (see Chapter 29). Although one study suggested that vitamin     second-trimester amniocentesis, leakage stopped in most cases with
C supplementation had value in preventing preterm PROM (7.6%               conservative management, although a normal fluid volume sometimes
versus 24.5%; P = .02), studies in which vitamin C was given alone or      took time to re-accumulate (in a range of 8 to 51 days).58
with other supplements to women without prior preterm birth as a
risk factor indicate a trend toward increased preterm birth with such
treatments (relative risk [RR] = 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI],
1.04 to 1.82).51,52 Vitamin C supplementation to prevent preterm birth
                                                                           Complications after
due to PROM thus cannot be recommended until there is solid evi-           Premature Rupture of
dence of benefit.
    Perhaps the strongest risk factor for preterm PROM is a history of     the Membranes
prematurity or PROM.53 Those with an early preterm birth have the
highest risk for a recurrence. A history of preterm birth after PROM       Maternal Complications
confers a 3.3-fold increased risk for recurrent preterm birth due to the   Chorioamnionitis complicates 9% of pregnancies with term PROM, a
same cause (13.5% versus 4.1%; P < .01) and a 13.5-fold higher risk        risk that increases to 24% with membrane rupture lasting longer than
of subsequent delivery before 28 weeks (1.8% versus 0.13%; P < .01).       24 hours.59 The risk of intrauterine infection increases with the dura-
Because prior obstetric outcome has such a strong influence on              tion of membrane rupture and with declining gestational age.54,55,60-62
subsequent pregnancy outcomes, it is useful to evaluate nulliparas         Conservative management of PROM provides the opportunity for
separately from those with prior deliveries. When assessed at 22 to        subclinical deciduitis to progress to overt infection and for ascending
24 weeks’ gestation, medical complications (e.g., pulmonary disease in     infection to occur.20,54,55,62 Chorioamnionitis can complicate 13% to
pregnancy), work during pregnancy, low maternal body mass index            60% of cases when PROM occurs remote from term. Endometritis
(<19.8 kg/m2), and bacterial vaginosis are associated with preterm         occurs in 2% to 13% of cases.63,64 Placental abruption is diagnosed in
birth due to PROM.46 Identification of a cervical length shorter than       4% to 12% of pregnancies complicated by PROM and can occur before
25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound also confers an increased risk of         or after the onset of membrane rupture.34,65,66 Maternal sepsis (0.8%)
subsequent PROM in nulliparas and multiparas. In this study, nullipa-      leading to death (0.14%) is a uncommon complication of preterm
ras with a short cervix and a positive cervicovaginal fibronectin screen-   PROM occurring near the limit of viability.67
CHAPTER 31           Premature Rupture of the Membranes                601
                                                                             reported outcomes of previable PROM may be optimistic because
Fetal Complications                                                          most studies have been retrospective and have included only patients
The risks to the fetus are primarily those related to intrauterine infec-    amenable to conservative management.
tion, umbilical cord compression, and placental abruption. Fetal heart           Fetal lung growth and development can be especially adversely
rate patterns consistent with umbilical cord compression due to              affected when PROM occurs in the early phases of development.82-87
oligohydramnios are commonly seen after PROM.68 Umbilical cord               With PROM occurring during the late pseudoglandular or canalicular
prolapse can occur after membrane rupture, particularly with fetal           stage of pulmonary development, tracheobronchial collapse or loss of
malpresentation, which is more common with preterm gestations.               intrinsic factors within the tracheobronchial fluid, or both, may lead
Fetal death occurs in 1% to 2% of cases of conservatively managed            to failure of the terminal bronchioles and alveoli to develop, with
PROM.56 The reported incidence of fetal death after PROM at 16 to            resultant failure of lung growth.88-91 Pulmonary hypoplasia develops
28 weeks ranges from 3.8% to 22%.36,69,70 This particularly high risk of     over weeks after membrane rupture occurs. It is most accurately
fetal loss may reflect increased susceptibility to umbilical cord com-        diagnosed pathologically based on radial alveolar counts and lung
pression and hypoxia or intrauterine infection, but it may also reflect       weights.92,93 In surviving infants, pulmonary hypoplasia is suggested by
less aggressive obstetric interventions for fetal compromise before the      a small chest circumference with severe respiratory distress or persis-
limit of viability.                                                          tent pulmonary hypertension and radiographic findings such as
                                                                             small, well-aerated lungs with a bell-shaped chest and elevation of the
                                                                             diaphragm.83,88
Neonatal Complications                                                           Overall, pulmonary hypoplasia becomes evident in 0% to 26.5% of
Gestational age at delivery is the primary determinant of the frequency      infants (mean = 5.9%) delivering after PROM at 16 to 26 weeks’ gesta-
and severity of neonatal complications after PROM. Respiratory dis-          tion. Early PROM before 20 weeks’ gestation carries the highest poten-
tress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage,      tial for lethal pulmonary hypoplasia (≈50% with PROM before 19
and sepsis are the most common serious acute morbidities, and they           weeks’ gestation).83,86-88,94-96 With PROM at 15 to 16 weeks, an amniotic
are common with early preterm birth. Neonatal sepsis is twofold more         fluid index of 2 cm or less, and a latency of 28 days, the risk of pulmo-
common after preterm PROM than after preterm birth due to preterm            nary hypoplasia is estimated to be 74% to 82%.97 Lethal pulmonary
labor. Neonatal infection can manifest as congenital pneumonia,              hypoplasia is uncommon with PROM after 24 to 26 weeks’ gestation
sepsis, meningitis, and late-onset bacterial or fungal infection. Early      (0% to 1.4%) because there has been adequate alveolar development
preterm birth can lead to long-term complications, including chronic         to support extrauterine life by this time.83,84,98 However, nonlethal pul-
lung disease, visual or hearing difficulties, mental retardation,             monary hypoplasia increases the likelihood of pulmonary barotrauma,
developmental and motor delay, and cerebral palsy. In general, these         including pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and the need for high
long-term morbidities are uncommon with delivery after about                 ventilatory pressures because of poor pulmonary compliance.83,98,99
32 weeks’ gestation.71,72 Cerebral palsy and periventricular leukomala-      With prolonged oligohydramnios, restriction deformities can occur in
cia have been associated with amnionitis,73 and increased amniotic           up to 27% of fetuses.67,83,98-101
fluid cytokines and fetal systemic inflammation have been associated
with preterm PROM, periventricular leukomalacia, and cerebral
palsy.74-76 This highlights the need for potential neonatal benefit
from delayed delivery if conservative management is to be attempted
                                                                             Diagnosis
because this delay offers the opportunity for intrauterine infection to      In more than 90% of cases, the diagnosis of PROM can be confirmed
develop. Alternatively, early gestational age at birth has been associated   by clinical assessment, including the combination of history, clinical
with neonatal white matter damage (P < .001) after controlling for           examination, and laboratory evaluation. Because optimal clinical care
other factors.77 Despite the described associations between PROM,            requires an accurate diagnosis, attention should be paid to confirming
intrauterine infection or inflammation, and adverse neurologic out-           the diagnosis when a suspicious history or ultrasound finding of oli-
comes, it has not been shown that immediate delivery after PROM can          gohydramnios is identified. Other potentially confounding findings
prevent these morbidities.                                                   such as urine leakage, increased vaginal discharge with cervical dilata-
    In the past, mid-trimester PROM, which encompasses membrane              tion or membrane prolapse, cervical infection, passage of the mucous
rupture occurring at about 16 to 26 weeks’ gestation, was considered         plug, and the presence of semen or vaginal douching should be
as a separate entity from preterm PROM because neonatal death                considered.
usually could be anticipated with immediate delivery. With current               A sterile speculum examination should be performed to provide
survival rates of about 25% to 85% after delivery at 23 to 26 weeks’         confirmatory evidence of membrane rupture and to inspect for cervi-
gestation, mid-trimester PROM is no longer a relevant clinical               citis and for umbilical cord or fetal prolapse, to assess cervical dilata-
entity.71,72,78-80 Previable PROM occurring before the limit of viability    tion and effacement, and to obtain cultures, including endocervical
(i.e., before 23 weeks’ gestation) is a special circumstance that places     Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis, and anovaginal
the fetus in particular jeopardy. Immediate delivery will result in          Streptococcus agalactiae (i.e., GBS), as appropriate. Initially, digital
neonatal death. Conservative management may result in fetal or               cervical examination should be avoided unless imminent delivery is
neonatal loss before viability, and if viability is reached, delivery is     anticipated because the needed information usually can be obtained
likely at an early gestational age, when the risks of long-term sequelae     with visualization of the cervix. Digital examination can shorten
are highest. The neonatal survival rate after PROM occurring before          latency between membrane rupture and delivery, and some studies
24 weeks has previously been reported to be approximately 30%, com-          have shown it to introduce vaginal organisms into the cervical canal
pared with 57% for rupture at 24 to 26 weeks’ gestation.67 In a review       and to increase the risk of infection.102-107
of 201 cases from 11 studies, the perinatal survival rate with conserva-         The diagnosis of membrane rupture is confirmed by visualization
tive management of PROM before 23 weeks’ gestation was 21%, but              of fluid passing from the cervical canal. If the diagnosis is not con-
there was similar survival after PROM at less than 20 weeks.81 These         firmed on initial inspection, the pH of the vaginal side walls or pooled
602       CHAPTER 31             Premature Rupture of the Membranes

vaginal fluid can be evaluated using Nitrazine paper, which turns blue         of fluid across a weakened membrane or minimal leakage around a
at a pH above 6.0 to 6.5. Amniotic fluid usually has a pH of 7.1 to 7.3,       firmly applied presenting fetal part. Women with a suspicious history
whereas normal vaginal secretions have a pH of about 4.5 to 6.0. Blood        and initially negative testing should be encouraged to return for reeval-
or semen contamination, alkaline antiseptics, and bacterial vaginosis         uation if symptoms are persistent or recurrent.
can cause false-positive Nitrazine test results. If further clarification is
needed, microscopic inspection can be performed for the presence of
arborized crystals (i.e., ferning) (Fig. 31-1) in an air-dried sample col-
lected from the vaginal side walls or pooled vaginal fluid. Ferning            Management of Premature
results from the interaction of amniotic fluid proteins and salts. Cervi-
cal mucus should be avoided during sampling because it can also yield
                                                                              Rupture of the Membranes
a ferning pattern on microscopy. The fern test is unaffected by meco-         Management of PROM is based primarily on the estimated risks for
nium and vaginal pH, but it can be falsely positive if there is heavy         fetal and neonatal complications with immediate delivery weighed
blood contamination.108,109 Prolonged leakage with minimal residual           against the potential risks and benefits of conservative management to
fluid can lead to false-negative clinical, Nitrazine, and ferning test         extend the pregnancy after membrane rupture (Fig. 31-2). The risks of
results. Re-examination after prolonged recumbency or alternate mea-          maternal morbidity should also be considered, especially under the
sures can be considered if initial testing is negative. Assessment of         circumstance of previable PROM.
cervicovaginal secretions for fetal fibronectin, prolactin, human cho-
rionic gonadotropin (hCG), and other markers may assist in the diag-
nosis of PROM. However, these tests usually are not more helpful than         Initial Evaluation
the initial measures listed previously, because a positive test result        After the diagnosis of membrane rupture is confirmed, the duration
may reflect decidual disruption rather than membrane rupture in                of membrane rupture should be estimated to assist the pediatric
some cases and a negative test result cannot exclude the diagnosis            caregivers with subsequent management decisions. Gestational age
unequivocally.                                                                is established based on the combination of menstrual dates, clinical
    If the diagnosis remains unclear after initial evaluation, documen-       history, and ultrasound findings, as appropriate. Fetal presentation is
tation of oligohydramnios by ultrasound, in the absence of fetal urinary      assessed, and the patient is evaluated for labor, clinical findings of
tract malformations or significant growth restriction, is suggestive of        intrauterine infection, and significant vaginal bleeding. Fetal well-
membrane rupture. Ultrasonographically guided amniocentesis with              being is assessed by continuous heart rate monitoring if the limit of
infusion of indigo carmine dye (1 mL of dye in 9 mL of sterile normal         viability has been reached. After preterm PROM, it is important to
saline), followed by observation for passage of blue fluid from the            evaluate fetal growth and residual amniotic fluid volume by ultra-
vagina onto a perineal pad, can confirm or disprove the diagnosis of           sound, and the potential of fetal abnormalities that can lead to poly-
membrane rupture. Amniocentesis in the setting of oligohydramnios             hydramnios should be considered. Although narrowing of the biparietal
can be difficult, and particular attention should be paid to avoidance         diameter (i.e., dolichocephaly) due to oligohydramnios or breech pre-
of the umbilical cord vessels, which can have the appearance of a thin,       sentation can result in underestimation of gestational age and fetal
linear fluid space under this circumstance.                                    weight, ultrasound usually is as reliable after PROM as it is with intact
    Some women with a history suspicious for membrane rupture but             membranes.110 Tables using fetal head circumference rather than bipa-
a negative speculum examination result and a normal amniotic fluid             rietal diameter can be consulted as needed. GBS carrier status should
volume on ultrasound subsequently return with gross membrane                  be ascertained if available from culture results within 6 weeks or there
rupture. This pattern may reflect initial transudation of a small amount       has been a positive urine culture in the current pregnancy, and the need
                                                                              for intrapartum prophylaxis should be determined. In the absence of
                                                                              available culture results, a risk factor–based approach should be used
                                                                              for prevention of vertical transmission.111
                                                                                  If conservative management is planned, the patient should be cared
                                                                              for in a facility with the ability to provide emergent delivery for pla-
                                                                              cental abruption, fetal malpresentation, or fetal distress. The facility
                                                                              should also have neonatal intensive care facilities and offer acute
                                                                              neonatal resuscitation, because conservative management usually is
                                                                              undertaken only if there is a significant risk of neonatal morbidity and
                                                                              mortality with immediate delivery. Prenatal maternal transfer should
                                                                              be undertaken early in the course of management if these resources
                                                                              are not available. Because of the potential for acute complications,
                                                                              outpatient management usually is not recommended when PROM
                                                                              occurs after the limit of viability.


                                                                              Term Premature Rupture of
                                                                              the Membranes
FIGURE 31-1 Ferning. A typical ferning appearance is seen after a
                                                                              There is no substantial fetal benefit to expectant management of preg-
swab from the posterior vaginal fornix was smeared on glass slide             nancy after membrane rupture at 37 weeks’ gestation or later. Expect-
and the specimen allowed to air dry. The sample was obtained from a           ant management of PROM at term was practiced in the 1980s and early
patient with premature rupture of the membranes. (Image courtesy of           1990s based on studies suggesting that immediate induction after term
Thomas Garite, University of California at Irvine, Orange, California.)       PROM might increase the risks of infection and cesarean delivery.112-115
CHAPTER 31              Premature Rupture of the Membranes                  603


                                                             Diagnosis confirmed
                                                            Fluid per cervical os or
                                               vaginal pool with positive Nitrazine/ferning test or
                                                        indigo carmine amnio infusion



                                        Ultrasound for gestational age, growth, anomalies as appropriate
                                                   Cervical cultures:       Chlamydia, gonorrhea
                                                  Anovaginal culture:       group B streptococcus
                                                       Urine culture:       group B streptococcus

                                             Initial and continuous monitoring for labor, fetal distress

                                                                                                                              Intrapartum group B
                                                                                                                          streptococcus prophylaxis,
                                                                   Amnionitis,                                            based on risk factors if no
                                                               abruptio placentae,          Yes                                  recent negative
                                                                   fetal death,                        Deliver                 anovaginal culture
                                                             non-reassuring testing,
                                                               or advanced labor                                          Broad-spectrum antibiotics
                                                                                                                                 if amnionitis
                                                                             No


           Previable PROM                         Early Preterm PROM                   Preterm PROM              Late Preterm PROM       Term PROM
               23 weeks                               23-31 weeks                       32-33 weeks                  34-36 weeks           37 weeks


                                                                                      Documented fetal            Yes
                    Initial monitoring                                               pulmonary maturity
                      for infection,
                     labor, abruptio                                                              No
                         placentae
                                                                                      Immature testing
                     Initial bed rest                                                         or
                      to encourage                                                    fluid unavailable
                        resealing              Conservative management
                                                Modified bed rest/pelvic
                                                   rest to encourage
                                               resealing, reduce infection
                       Evaluate for                                                Consider conservative
                        persistent                 Serial evaluation for              management for
                    oligohydramnios                 amnionitis, labor,              corticosteroid benefit
                     and pulmonary                   abruption, fetal                  with concurrent
                     hypoplasia with                well-being, growth                antibiotic therapy,
                    serial ultrasound                                                          or
                                                Administer corticosteroids          expeditious delivery if
                                                 and antibiotics (NICHD              previous antenatal
                              Re-counsel
                                                 protocol) short-term              steroids and attempted
                                                        tocolysis                     latency 1 week
      Induction       If discharged
         with        before viability                                                    not planned
                                                  Deliver for amnionitis,
      oxytocin,       and remains                  non-reassuring fetal
      PGE2 or            pregnant,                  testing, abruption,
    misoprostol,        readmit at                    advanced labor                              33 weeks
          or        fetal viability for                                            32 weeks
                                                                                                   Deliver
   dilatation and     conservative                                                 Deliver at                       Expeditious           Expeditious
                                                  Deliver at 34 weeks if           34 weeks          after
    evacuation       management                     stable until then                                                delivery              delivery
                                                                                                   steroids




                                                                                  Intrapartum group B streptococcus prophylaxis based on
                                                                                     risk factors if no recent negative anovaginal culture

                                                                                          Broad-spectrum antibiotics if amnionitis


FIGURE 31-2 Algorithm for management of premature rupture of the membranes (PROM). The algorithm includes several alternatives for
the approach to term and preterm PROM. NICHD, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; PGE2, prostaglandin E2. (Adapted
from Mercer BM: Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 101:178-193, 2003.)
604       CHAPTER 31             Premature Rupture of the Membranes

However, four large studies have since found that induction with oxy-         conservative management of PROM is highlighted by the high inci-
tocin after term PROM does not increase the risks of maternal or neo-         dence of recurrent variable decelerations found during intermittent
natal infections, nor does it make cesarean delivery more likely.54,116-118   monitoring (19.4%) among conservatively managed women. In this
In the largest study, oxytocin induction after term PROM reduced the          study, documented fetal pulmonary maturity was a requirement for
duration of membrane rupture (17.2 versus 33.3 hours; P < .001) and           enrollment, and neither group suffered any significant noninfectious
the frequencies of chorioamnionitis (4.0% versus 8.6%; P < .001) and          neonatal morbidities. Specific attention to those enrolled at 32 to 33
postpartum febrile morbidity (1.9% versus 3.6%; P = .008), without            weeks’ gestation revealed similar trends regarding brief latency,
increasing the risk of cesarean delivery (13.7% versus 14.1%) or neo-         increased amnionitis, suspected neonatal sepsis, and antibiotic treat-
natal infections (2.0% versus 2.8%).54 Neonatal antibiotic therapy was        ment with conservative management.130 Based on these findings, the
less common with immediate induction (7.5% versus 13.7%; P < .001),           woman with PROM and documented fetal pulmonary maturity at 32
likely because of a lower concern regarding the potential for neonatal        to 33 weeks’ gestation is at low risk for complications after immediate
infection with less frequent prolonged rupture of the membranes and           delivery and increased risk with conservative management. Amniotic
less chorioamnionitis. Meta-analysis of studies comparing prostaglan-         fluid studies documenting pulmonary maturity in this gestational age
din induction and conservative management in this setting has found           range are useful to identify women who should be offered expeditious
shorter latency, decreased rates of chorioamnionitis, and less frequent       delivery.
neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions with no increase in                If fetal pulmonary testing reveals an immature result or if amniotic
cesarean delivery rates with prostaglandin administration.119 Because         fluid cannot be obtained for assessment, conservative management
oxytocin can more easily be discontinued, this choice is somewhat             with antenatal corticosteroid administration for fetal maturation is an
more appealing, given similar efficacy for labor induction.                    appropriate choice. Concurrent antibiotic treatment should be given
    In summary, available data indicate that women with PROM at               to reduce the risk of intrauterine infection during conservative
term who are not in labor on arrival at the hospital should have labor        management (discussed later). There are no data regarding optimal
induced, usually with an oxytocin infusion, to reduce the risk of mater-      management after antenatal corticosteroid treatment is completed.
nal and neonatal complications. Caregivers should allow an adequate           However, because conservative management increases the risks of
time for the latent phase of labor and minimize digital vaginal exami-        chorioamnionitis and prolonged hospitalization and because it is
nations until the active phase of labor.                                      unlikely that conservative management for less than 1 week will result
                                                                              in further significant spontaneous fetal maturation, delivery should be
Preterm Premature Rupture of                                                  considered if elective delivery is planned within 7 days after antenatal
                                                                              corticosteroid benefit has been achieved. If antenatal corticosteroids
the Membranes at 32 to 36                                                     are not to be given to accelerate fetal pulmonary maturity after PROM
Weeks’ Gestation                                                              at 32 to 33 weeks, consideration should be given to the potential
Although infants born at 34 to 36 weeks’ gestation (i.e., late preterm        benefits of expeditious delivery unless conservative management to
birth) have a higher risk of complications than term infants, severe          extend latency for 1 or more weeks will be attempted. These decisions
acute morbidities and mortality are uncommon, and antenatal corti-            should take into consideration local population-based risks of infec-
costeroids for fetal maturation are not typically recommended in this         tion and neonatal morbidities.
gestational age range.71,120 Conservative management of PROM at 34
to 36 weeks prolongs pregnancy by only days, significantly increases           Preterm Premature Rupture of
the risk of chorioamnionitis (16% versus 2%; P = .001), and reduces
umbilical cord pH (7.35 versus 7.25; P = .009), and it has not been
                                                                              the Membranes at 23 to 31
shown to improve neonatal outcomes.121,122 For these reasons, women           Weeks’ Gestation
presenting with late preterm PROM at 34 to 36 weeks should be                 Because delivery before 32 weeks’ gestation is associated with a high risk
actively delivered.                                                           for perinatal death, severe neonatal morbidities, and long-term sequelae,
    With delivery at 32 to 33 weeks’ gestation, gestational age–depen-        women with PROM between 23 and 31 weeks’ gestation usually should
dent neonatal morbidities, including respiratory distress syndrome,           be managed expectantly to prolong pregnancy unless there is evidence
can occur, but the likelihood of survival is high, and chronic morbidi-       of intrauterine infection, suspected placental abruption, advanced
ties are uncommon. Amniotic fluid can be collected from the vaginal            labor, or a non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern. Under certain addi-
pool at initial sterile speculum examination or by amniocentesis if           tional circumstances, delivery may be appropriate despite an early ges-
vaginal fluid is not available. Each of the TDx/TdXFLx FLM II assay            tational age at membrane rupture (e.g., fetal transverse lie and back up
(Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), the lecithin-to-sphingomyelin         with coexisting advanced cervical dilatation, human immunodeficiency
ratio (L/S ratio), and the phosphatidylglycerol (PG) test can predict         virus infection, primary herpes simplex virus infection).
pulmonary maturity when performed on vaginal pool specimens.123-128               In women with conservatively managed PROM remote from term,
Modest reductions in the duration of neonatal hospital stay and hyper-        a low initial amniotic fluid volume (amniotic fluid index <5.0 cm or
bilirubinemia with conservative management of PROM at 32 to 33                maximum vertical fluid pocket <2.0 cm) is associated with shorter
weeks’ gestation have been reported.122 Alternatively, conservative           latency to delivery and increased neonatal morbidity (including respi-
management prolonged pregnancy only briefly (36 versus 14 hours;               ratory distress syndrome) but not with increased maternal or neonatal
P < .001) in a randomized, controlled trial of conservative manage-           infection after PROM.131 Despite this, the predictive value of a low
ment versus immediate induction after PROM at 32 to 36 weeks’ gesta-          amniotic fluid volume for adverse outcomes is poor. A short cervical
tion. This limited benefit was offset by a 2.5-fold increased risk of          length on endovaginal ultrasound after preterm PROM has been asso-
chorioamnionitis (27.7% versus 10.9%; P = .06), increased neonatal            ciated with shorter latency to delivery.132-134 The latest study of cervical
sepsis workups (59.6% versus 28.3%; P =.003) and increased neonatal           length in women with preterm PROM found that 83% of women
antibiotic treatment for suspected infection (78.7% versus 34.8%; P <         delivered within 7 days if the initial cervical length was 1 to 10 mm,
.001).129 The potential for occult umbilical cord compression during          compared with 18% for a cervical length more than 30 mm, but only
CHAPTER 31           Premature Rupture of the Membranes                605
41 women were evaluated.132 However, currently available studies of            roid administration after preterm PROM has been extensively studied,
initial amniotic fluid volume and cervical length assessment in women           generating several meta-analyses.145-147 Although early reviews pro-
with preterm PROM have insufficient power and consistency to guide              duced conflicting conclusions about the utility of antenatal corticoste-
management.                                                                    roid treatment after PROM, a later meta-analysis concluded that
    Conservative management includes initial prolonged continuous              antenatal glucocorticoids significantly reduce the risks of respiratory
fetal heart rate and maternal contraction monitoring to assess fetal           distress syndrome (20% versus 35.4%), intraventricular hemorrhage
well-being and identify occult contractions and evidence of umbilical          (7.5% versus 15.9%), and necrotizing enterocolitis (0.8% versus 4.6%),
cord compression. If initial testing results are reassuring, the patient       without increasing the risks of maternal (9.2% versus 5.1%) or neo-
can be transferred to an inpatient unit or transferred to a facility           natal (7.0% versus 6.6%) infections in women with preterm PROM.147
capable of emergent delivery and acute neonatal resuscitation for              Multivariate analysis of prospective observational trials suggested a
modified bed rest. Because of the high risk of heart rate abnormalities         benefit of antenatal corticosteroid use regardless of membrane
due to umbilical cord compression (32% to 76%), fetal assessment               rupture.148 Three studies in which prophylactic antibiotics were given
should be performed at least daily for those with initially reassuring         concurrent to antenatal corticosteroids found treatment to reduce
test results.68,135 Continuous monitoring may be appropriate for women         respiratory distress syndrome (18.4% versus 43.6%; P = .03) perinatal
with intermittent fetal heart rate decelerations but otherwise reassur-        mortality (1.3% versus 8.3%; P = .05), and composite morbidities
ing findings. Although the nonstress test and biophysical profile have           (29.3% versus 48.6%; P < .05), with no increase in perinatal
the ability to confirm fetal well-being in the setting of preterm PROM,         infections.149-151
fetal heart rate monitoring can identify variable and late decelerations           The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel
in addition to uterine activity. Biophysical profile testing may also be        recommended a single course of antenatal corticosteroids for women
confounded by the presence of oligohydramnios but can be helpful if            with PROM before 30 to 32 weeks’ gestation in the absence of intra-
the nonstress test is equivocal, particularly remote from term when the        amniotic infection.152 Data regarding repeated weekly courses of
fetal heart rate pattern is less likely to be reactive. A nonreactive result   antenatal corticosteroids after preterm PROM are conflicting. In a
for a nonstress test and a biophysical profile score of 6 or less within        retrospective study that controlled for gestational age and other factors,
24 hours of delivery have been associated with perinatal infection.136,137     two or more courses of antenatal corticosteroids were associated with
A nonreactive nonstress test subsequent to an initially reactive result        increased early neonatal sepsis (15.3% versus 2% for a single course or
should be considered suspicious.                                               1.5% for no courses; P < .001).153 In another retrospective analysis of
    Conservative management requires surveillance for the devel-               repeated antenatal corticosteroids, there was no reduction in respira-
opment of labor, abruptio placentae, and intrauterine infection.               tory distress syndrome, but intraventricular hemorrhage and amnio-
Chorioamnionitis confers increased risks of perinatal mortality and            nitis were less common, and there was a trend toward less sepsis.154
intraventricular hemorrhage, and it is diagnosed clinically by the pres-       Respiratory distress syndrome was less common in another retrospec-
ence of maternal fever above 38.0 °C (100.4 °F) with uterine tenderness        tive review of repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroids (34.9%
or with maternal or fetal tachycardia in the absence of another evident        versus 45.2%) without an increase in neonatal sepsis (9.9% versus
source of infection.63 After the diagnosis of chorioamnionitis is made,        6.2%).155
delivery should be pursued and broad-spectrum antibiotics should be                Based on current evidence that antenatal corticosteroids are effec-
initiated because treatment before delivery has been shown to decrease         tive for induction of fetal pulmonary maturity without increasing the
the incidence of neonatal sepsis.138-140 Although evaluation of the mater-     risk of infection and that most women will remain pregnant for the 24
nal white blood cell count can be helpful if clinical findings are equivo-      to 48 hours needed to achieve corticosteroid benefit after PROM, a
cal, the counts can be artificially elevated within 5 to 7 days of antenatal    single course of antenatal corticosteroids should be considered when
corticosteroid administration. If the diagnosis of chorioamnionitis is         PROM occurs before 32 weeks’ gestation and for women with
suspected but additional confirmation is needed, amniocentesis may              documented pulmonary immaturity at 32 to 33 weeks’ gestation.
yield helpful results.15,141,142 A glucose concentration below 16 to 20 mg/    Betamethasone (two doses of 12 mg IM, given 24 hours apart) or
dL (sensitivity and specificity of 80% to 90% for a positive culture) and       dexamethasone (four doses of 6 mg IM, given 12 hours apart) is con-
a Gram stain positive for bacteria (sensitivity of 36% to 80% and speci-       sidered appropriate. Repeated weekly antenatal corticosteroids are not
ficity of 80% to 97% for a positive culture) support the presence of            recommended after preterm PROM. The benefits and risks of a single
intrauterine infection. The presence of leukocytes alone in amniotic           rescue course remote from initial corticosteroid administration remain
fluid after PROM is not well correlated with intrauterine infection.            to be determined.
Although a positive amniotic fluid culture supports clinical suspicion
of chorioamnionitis (sensitivity of 65% to 85% and specificity of 85%),         Adjunctive Antibiotics
these results are not likely to be available before the diagnosis is clari-    Antibiotic therapy is given during conservative management of
fied.17 One study suggested that determination of glucose levels from           preterm PROM to treat or prevent ascending decidual infection to
vaginally collected amniotic fluid may be a simple and noninvasive              prolong pregnancy and to reduce gestational age–dependent morbid-
method for identification of intra-amniotic infection.143 In this promis-       ity while limiting the risk of neonatal infection. More than two dozen
ing study, a vaginal pool glucose value below 5 mg/dL had a 74.2%              randomized clinical trials have been summarized in several meta-
accuracy rate for identifying women with a positive amniotic fluid              analyses.56,156,157 In the latest one, antibiotic treatment after preterm
culture. Although research has found elevated amniotic fluid interleu-          PROM significantly reduced chorioamnionitis (relative risk [RR] =
kin levels to be associated with early delivery and perinatal infectious       0.57); delivery within 48 hours (RR = 0.71) and within 7 days (RR =
morbidity,141 such testing is not available in most clinical laboratories.     0.80); and reduced infant morbidities, including neonatal infection
                                                                               (RR = 0.68); and major cerebral abnormalities on ultrasound before
Antenatal Corticosteroids                                                      discharge (RR = 0.82) compared with placebo therapy.157 The need for
Respiratory distress syndrome is the most common acute morbidity               surfactant administration (RR = 0.83) and oxygen therapy (RR = 0.88)
after conservatively managed preterm PROM.144 Antenatal corticoste-            was also reduced. Antibiotics did not influence the risk of necrotizing
606      CHAPTER 31              Premature Rupture of the Membranes

enterocolitis (RR = 1.14; CI, 0.66 to 1.97). Oral amoxicillin-clavulanic     longation, less need for oxygen therapy, and fewer positive neonatal
acid treatment was associated with increased necrotizing enterocolitis       blood cultures.157 This is not inconsistent with the NICHD-MFMU
(RR = 4.60; 95% CI, 1.98 to 10.72) in this analysis, but oral erythro-       approach. Up to a 7-day course of parenteral and oral therapy using
mycin therapy was not (RR = 1.00; CI, 0.56 to 1.80).157 The study that       ampicillin-amoxicillin and erythromycin is recommended for women
dominated this meta-analysis included women with PROM up to 36               undergoing conservative management of preterm PROM remote from
weeks’ gestation and included a population at low risk for necrotizing       term. Shortages in intravenous and oral antibiotics have led to the need
enterocolitis overall (i.e., 0.5% among controls), and it was the only       for alternative antibiotic choices. Oral ampicillin, erythromycin, and
one of 10 studies that found a significant increase in necrotizing            azithromycin are likely appropriate alternatives if needed.
enterocolitis with antibiotic therapy.158 The meta-analysis found treat-         Adjunctive antibiotic administration to prolong latency must be
ment with “all penicillins” (excluding amoxicillin-clavulanic acid)          distinguished from intrapartum prophylaxis to prevent vertical trans-
versus placebo to be associated with fewer births within 48 hours and        mission of GBS from mother to baby.111 Known GBS carriers and those
7 days of PROM, less overall maternal infection and chorioamnionitis,        who deliver before carrier status can be determined should receive
less neonatal infection, fewer positive neonatal blood cultures, and         intrapartum prophylaxis to prevent vertical transmission, regardless of
fewer major intracranial cerebral ultrasound abnormalities. Because of       prior antibiotic treatments. Women with a diagnosis of chorioamnio-
the increased risk of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis with amoxicil-      nitis should receive broad-spectrum intrapartum antibiotic therapy.
lin-clavulanate, the study authors recommended erythromycin as a
better choice, even though benefits were limited to reduction in deliv-       Tocolysis
ery at 48 hours, fewer positive neonatal blood cultures, and a reduced       Evidence from prospective studies of tocolysis after PROM is similar
need for oxygen therapy.                                                     to that from studies of tocolysis for preterm labor with intact
    In a clinical trial with adequate power to evaluate antibiotic therapy   membranes.162-167 After preterm PROM, prophylactic tocolysis with β-
during conservative management of women with preterm PROM                    agonists before the onset of contractions can prolong pregnancy briefly.
before 32 weeks’ gestation, the National Institutes of Child Health and      Therapeutic tocolysis administered only after contractions occur has
Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Units (NICHD-                      not been shown to be effective in prolonging latency. In a retrospective
MFMU) Research Network assigned women with PROM to initial                   comparison of aggressive tocolysis with limited treatment for contrac-
aggressive intravenous therapy for 48 hours (2 g of ampicillin IV every      tions only during the first 48 hours, aggressive therapy was not associ-
6 hours and 250 mg of erythromycin IV every 6 hours) followed by             ated with longer latency (3.8 versus 4.5 days; P = .16).167 A report from
oral therapy for 5 days (250 mg of amoxicillin PO every 8 hours and          the Collaborative Study on Antenatal Steroids suggested tocolytic
333 mg of enteric-coated erythromycin base PO every 8 hours) to              use after PROM was associated with subsequent neonatal respiratory
provide limited-duration, broad-spectrum antimicrobial coverage              distress syndrome, but the biologic mechanism for this association is
before delivery.144,159 GBS screening was performed. GBS carriers were       unclear.168
treated with ampicillin for 1 week and again in labor, and they were             Overall, the available prospective studies have not found tocolytic
analyzed separately. Antibiotic treatment increased the likelihood of        treatment after PROM to increase or prevent neonatal morbidities
continued pregnancy after 7 days of treatment by twofold. Benefit             after PROM. Tocolytic therapy has not been studied when antenatal
persisted for 3 weeks after randomization despite discontinuation of         corticosteroids and antibiotics were administered concurrently, and
antibiotics at 7 days. Babies born to women treated with ampicillin          it remains plausible that prophylactic tocolysis could delay delivery
plus erythromycin had a reduced incidence of one or more major               long enough to allow antibiotic suppression of subclinical decidual
infant morbidities (53% versus 44% rate of composite morbidity,              infection and for corticosteroid effects on the fetus. Pending further
including death, respiratory distress syndrome, early sepsis, severe         study in this area, tocolytic therapy should not be considered an
intraventricular hemorrhage, and severe necrotizing enterocolitis; P <       expected practice after preterm PROM, but it may be appropriate in
.05). Antibiotic therapy also significantly reduced individual gesta-         pregnancies at high risk for neonatal complications with early preterm
tional age–dependent morbidities, including respiratory distress syn-        birth.
drome (40.5% versus 48.7%), patent ductus arteriosus (11.7% versus
20.2%), chronic lung disease (bronchopulmonary dysplasia: 20.5%              Cervical Cerclage
versus 13.0%), and stage 3 or 4 necrotizing enterocolitis (2.3% versus       Preterm PROM complicates about one fourth of pregnancies with a
5.8%), with P values of 0.05 or less for each. Chorioamnionitis was          cervical cerclage and one half of pregnancies requiring an emergent
reduced with the study’s antibiotics (23% versus 32.5%; P = .01), and        cerclage.43,169,170 Because no prospective studies have been performed
neonatal sepsis (8.4% versus 15.6%; P = .009) and pneumonia (2.9%            regarding management of preterm PROM with a cerclage in situ, rec-
versus 7.0%; P = .04) were reduced for those who were not GBS carri-         ommendations reflect the data available from retrospective cohorts.
ers. The antibiotic study group had less neonatal GBS sepsis (0% versus      The risk of adverse perinatal outcomes does not appear to be different
1.5%; P = .03). Two other studies have attempted to determine whether        when PROM occurs with a cerclage or without one, provided the cer-
antibiotic therapy of shorter duration could provide similar benefit,         clage is removed on admission after PROM.171-172
but the studies lacked size and power to demonstrate equivalent                  Several small studies comparing pregnancies of preterm PROM in
effectiveness.160,161                                                        which the cerclage was retained or removed have yielded consistent
    In summary, broad-spectrum antibiotic (ampicillin-amoxicillin            patterns.173-175 No study has found cerclage retention after PROM to
plus erythromycin) therapy for women with preterm PROM before 32             reduce the frequency or severity of infant morbidities after preterm
weeks’ gestation prolongs pregnancy sufficiently to reduce neonatal           PROM, and each has demonstrated statistically insignificant trends
gestational age–dependent morbidities and reduce the frequencies of          toward increased maternal infectious morbidity with only brief preg-
maternal and neonatal infections.144 An alternative conclusion from          nancy prolongation. One study found increased infant mortality and
the latest meta-analysis is that penicillins other than amoxicillin-         mortality due to sepsis with cerclage retention after PROM.173 One
clavulanic acid are an acceptable treatment for preterm PROM and             study that compared different practices at two institutions found
that the benefits of erythromycin are limited to brief pregnancy pro-         longer latencies with cerclage retention, but this finding could reflect
CHAPTER 31           Premature Rupture of the Membranes                 607
population or practice differences at these institutions rather than the      specific neonatal outcomes after previable PROM is extremely difficult
effect of cerclage retention.174                                              because it is not possible to predict extended latency, the ultimate
    Because cerclage retention after PROM has not been shown to               gestational age at delivery, or the degree of neonatal pulmonary hypo-
improve perinatal outcomes and there are potential risks related to           plasia at the time of initial presentation with PROM.
leaving the cerclage in situ, removal is recommended when PROM                    For women who decide that the risks of conservative management
occurs, particularly if the indication for initial cerclage placement was     exceed the potential benefits, delivery can usually be accomplished
not strong. While deferred removal might enhance pregnancy prolon-            with vaginal prostaglandin E2, oral or vaginal prostaglandin E1 (i.e.,
gation for corticosteroid administration, the risks and benefits of this       misoprostol), with a high-dose oxytocin infusion, or by dilatation and
approach have not been determined.                                            evacuation. The optimal approach depends on the patient’s character-
                                                                              istics (e.g., gestational age, evident amnionitis, prior cesarean delivery)
Maternal Herpes Simplex Virus Infection                                       and preference, the available facilities, and the physician’s experience
Neonatal herpes simplex infection most commonly results from direct           with these techniques.
maternal-fetal transmission at delivery, but hematogenous transmis-               Data to guide the management for women who choose conservative
sion can occur to the fetus in utero in some cases. Neonatal infection        management of previable PROM are lacking. There is no consensus
rates after primary and secondary maternal infections occur in 34% to         about the advantages of inpatient versus outpatient management.
80% and 1% to 5% of cases, respectively,176,177 and infection can result      Initial inpatient evaluation may include strict bed and pelvic rest to
in mortality rates of 50% to 60% and serious sequelae in up to 50%            enhance the opportunity for resealing and for early identification of
of survivors.178,179                                                          infection and placental abruption. Women who are discharged should
    Based on two case series including a total of 35 women with an            be advised to abstain from intercourse and limit physical activity. They
active maternal genital herpesvirus infection, it has been generally          should return immediately in case of fever, abdominal pains, suspi-
accepted that increasing latency after membrane rupture of more than          cious vaginal discharge, or any vaginal bleeding. Hospitalization for
4 to 6 hours increases risk of neonatal infection and that cesarean           the duration of amniotic fluid leakage may be appropriate in some
delivery should be performed expeditiously to prevent fetal infection         circumstances. Discharged patients are typically readmitted to hospital
in this setting.180-182 However, a case series of women with conserva-        after the limit of viability has been reached to allow early intervention
tively managed PROM before 32 weeks’ gestation coincident to active           for infection, placental abruption, labor, and non-reassuring fetal heart
recurrent herpes simplex virus lesions suggests that conservative man-        rate patterns. Administration of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal
agement may be considered.183 Antenatal corticosteroids and antibiot-         maturation at this time is appropriate.
ics were not administered, and antiviral therapy was inconsistent in              After an initial ultrasound assessment, repeated evaluation can be
this series. Cesarean delivery was performed for women with active            performed every 1 to 2 weeks to determine whether there is re-accu-
lesions at the time of delivery. After latencies ranging from 1 to 35 days,   mulation of amniotic fluid and to evaluate lung growth. Persistent,
none of the 26 infants developed neonatal herpes infection (CI, 0% to         severe oligohydramnios after PROM before 20 weeks is the strongest
10.4%).                                                                       predictor of subsequent lethal pulmonary hypoplasia. Serial fetal bio-
    Based on these data, conservative management of PROM com-                 metric evaluation (e.g., lung length, chest circumference), ratios to
plicated by recurrent maternal herpes simplex virus infection may             adjust for overall fetal size (thoracic to abdominal circumference, tho-
be appropriate if membrane rupture occurs remote from term and                racic circumference to femur length) and Doppler studies of fetal pul-
the potential for mortality or serious sequelae with delivery is consid-      monary artery and ductus arteriosus waveform modulation with fetal
ered to be high. Antiviral therapy (e.g., acyclovir) during conserva-         breathing movements can demonstrate whether fetal pulmonary
tive management can reduce viral shedding and the frequency of                growth has occurred over time. These results have a high predictive
recurrence.                                                                   value for neonatal mortality due to pulmonary hypoplasia.88,96,185-190 If
                                                                              pulmonary hypoplasia becomes evident before the limit of viability or
Previable Premature Rupture of                                                there is persistent, severe oligohydramnios, the patient may choose to
                                                                              reconsider her decision regarding ongoing expectant management.
the Membranes before 23                                                           Treatments to seal the membrane defect or restore normal amniotic
Weeks’ Gestation                                                              fluid volume include transabdominal amnioinfusion and membrane
Although the cause is often not apparent, clinical antecedents can be         sealing with fibrin, platelet, cryoprecipitate, or gel-foam plugs. These
helpful in determining the likely outcomes in some cases of previable         methods are described in a review.191 The maternal risks and fetal
PROM. Membrane rupture after amniocentesis is associated with ces-            benefits of these interventions have not been adequately evaluated, and
sation of leakage and subsequent successful pregnancy outcomes in             there are inadequate data to recommend that any of these approaches
most cases. Alternatively, previable PROM in a pregnancy complicated          be incorporated into routine clinical practice.
by persistent second-trimester bleeding, oligohydramnios, or an ele-
vated level of maternal serum α-fetoprotein more likely reflects an
abnormality of placentation, which carries a poor prognosis.
    The patient with previable PROM and no other indication for
                                                                              Summary
immediate delivery should be counseled regarding the risks and bene-          When term or preterm PROM occurs, there is the potential for signifi-
fits of expectant management, including a realistic appraisal of poten-        cant perinatal morbidity and mortality, which can be reduced by con-
tial fetal and neonatal outcomes according to the available information       sidered and timely obstetric interventions. Expeditious delivery of the
for gestational age–appropriate outcomes.71,72,184 In addition to the         patient with term and late preterm PROM can reduce the risk of peri-
maternal risks of conservative management previously delineated,              natal infections without increasing the likelihood of operative delivery.
muscle wasting, bone demineralization, and deep venous thrombosis             Conservative management of PROM remote from term can reduce
can also occur with prolonged bed rest, and there are significant finan-        infectious and gestational age–dependent morbidities. Regardless of
cial and social implications of prolonged hospitalization. Prediction of      management approach, infants delivered after early preterm or previ-
608      CHAPTER 31                Premature Rupture of the Membranes

able PROM are at high risk for perinatal complications, many of which              19. Carroll SG, Papaioannou S, Davies ET, Nicolaides KH: Maternal assess-
cannot be avoided with current technologies and management algo-                       ment in the prediction of intrauterine infection in preterm prelabor amni-
rithms. Attention to early diagnosis and management of complications                   orrhexis. Fetal Diagn Ther 10:290-296, 1995.
that occur after PROM can lead to good perinatal outcomes in many                  20. Romero R, Mazor M, Wu YK, et al: Infection in the pathogenesis of
                                                                                       preterm labor. Semin Perinatol 12:262-279, 1988.
cases.
                                                                                   21. Heddleston L, McDuffie RS Jr, Gibbs RS: A rabbit model for ascending
                                                                                       infection in pregnancy: Intervention with indomethacin and delayed
                                                                                       ampicillin-sulbactam therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:708-712,
                                                                                       1993.
References                                                                         22. McDonald HM, O’Loughlin JA, Jolley PT, et al: Changes in vaginal flora
 1. Kitzmiller J: Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. In Fuchs F,              during pregnancy and association with preterm birth. J Infect Dis 170:724-
    Stubblefield PG (eds): Preterm Birth Causes, Prevention and Manage-                 728, 1994.
    ment. New York, Macmillan, 1984, p 298.                                        23. Regan JA, Chao S, James LS: Premature rupture of membranes, preterm
 2. Lei H, Kalluri R, Furth EE, et al: Amnion type IV collagen composition             delivery, and group B streptococcal colonization of mothers. Am J Obstet
    and metabolism: Implications for membrane breakdown. Biol. Reprod                  Gynecol 141:184-186, 1981.
    60:176-182, 1999.                                                              24. Alger LS, Lovchik JC, Hebel JR, et al: The association of Chlamydia tra-
 3. Lei H, Furth EE, Kalluri R, et al: A program of cell death and extracellular       chomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and group B streptococci with preterm
    matrix degradation is activated in the amnion before the onset of labor.           rupture of the membranes and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol
    J Clin Invest 98:1971-1978, 1997.                                                  159:397-404, 1988.
 4. Skinner SJM, Campos GA, Liggins GC: Collagen content of human amni-            25. Ekwo EE, Gosselink CA, Woolson R, Moawad A: Risks for premature
    otic membranes: Effect of gestation length and premature rupture. Obstet           rupture of amniotic membranes. Int J Epidemiol 22:495-503, 1993.
    Gynecol 57:487-489, 1981.                                                      26. McGregor JA, French JI, Parker R, et al: Prevention of premature birth by
 5. Malak TM, Bell SC: Structural characteristic of term human fetal mem-              screening and treatment for common genital tract infections: Results of a
    branes: A novel zone of extreme morphological alteration within the                prospective controlled evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:157-167,
    rupture site. BJOG 101:375-386, 1994.                                              1995.
 6. El Khwad M, Stetzer B, Moore RM, et al: Term human fetal membranes             27. Regan JA, Klebanoff MA, Nugent RP, et al: Colonization with group B
    have a weak zone overlying the lower uterine pole and cervix before the            streptococci in pregnancy and adverse outcome. VIP Study Group. Am J
    onset of labor. Biol Reprod 72:720-726, 2005.                                      Obstet Gynecol 174:1354-1360, 1996.
 7. McLaren J, Taylor DJ, Bell SC: Increased incidence of apoptosis in non-        28. Matorras R, Garcia Perea A, Omeñaca F, et al: Group B streptococcus and
    labor affected cytotrophoblast cells in term fetal membranes overlying the         premature rupture of membranes and preterm delivery. Gynecol Obstet
    cervix. Hum Reprod 14:2:895-900, 1999.                                             Invest 27:14-18, 1989.
 8. McParland PC, Taylor DJ, Bell SC: Mapping of zones of altered morphol-         29. Romero R, Mazor M, Oyarzun E, et al: Is there an association between
    ogy and choriodeciduaic connective tissue cellular phenotype in human              colonization with group B Streptococcus and prematurity? J Reprod Med
    fetal membranes (amnion and deciduas) overlying the lower uterine pole             34:797-801, 1989.
    and cervix before labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1481-1488,            30. Kubota T: Relationship between maternal group B streptococcal coloniza-
    2003.                                                                              tion and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 92:926-930, 1998.
 9. McLaren J, Taylor DJ, Bell SC: Increased concentration of pro-matrix           31. Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G: Bacterial vagino-
    metalloproteinase 9 in term fetal membranes overlying the cervix before            sis, the inflammatory response and the risk of preterm birth: A role for
    labor: Implications for membrane remodeling and rupture. Am J Obstet               genetic epidemiology in the prevention of preterm birth. Am J Obstet
    Gynecol 182:409-416, 2000.                                                         Gynecol 190:1509-1519, 2004.
10. Parry S, Strauss JF: Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. N Engl J        32. Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, et al: Association between bacterial
    Med 338:663-670, 1998.                                                             vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal
11. Athayde N, Edwin SS, Romero R, et al: A role for matrix metalloprotein-            Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 333:1737-1742,
    ase-9 in spontaneous rupture of the fetal membranes. Am J Obstet                   1995.
    Gynecol 179:1248-1253, 1998.                                                   33. Lavery JP, Miller CE, Knight RD: The effect of labor on the rheologic
12. Garite TJ, Freeman RK, Linzey EM, Braly P: The use of amniocentesis in             response of chorioamniotic membranes. Obstet Gynecol 60:87-92, 1982.
    patients with premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 54:226-           34. Meis PJ, Ernest JM, Moore ML: Causes of low birth-weight births in public
    230, 1979.                                                                         and private patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1165-1168, 1987.
13. Cotton DB, Gonik B, Bottoms SF: Conservative vs. aggressive manage-            35. Tucker JM, Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, et al: Etiologies of preterm birth
    ment of preterm rupture of membranes. A randomized trial of amnio-                 in an indigent population: Is prevention a logical expectation? Obstet
    centesis. Am J Perinatol 1:322-324, 1984.                                          Gynecol 77:343-347, 1991.
14. Romero R, Quintero R, Oyarzun E, et al: Intraamniotic infection and the        36. Taylor J, Garite T: Premature rupture of the membranes before fetal viabil-
    onset of labor in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J                 ity. Obstet Gynecol 64:615-620, 1984.
    Obstet Gynecol 159:661-666, 1988.                                              37. Minkoff H, Grunebaum AN, Schwarz RH, et al: Risk factors for prematu-
15. Broekhuizen FF, Gilman M, Hamilton PR: Amniocentesis for Gram stain                rity and premature rupture of membranes: A prospective study of the
    and culture in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet                  vaginal flora in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150:965-972, 1984.
    Gynecol 66:316-321, 1985.                                                      38. Naeye R: Factors that predispose to premature rupture of the fetal mem-
16. Dudley J, Malcolm G, Ellwood D: Amniocentesis in the management of                 branes. Obstet Gynecol 60:93-98, 1982.
    preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynae-           39. Maradny EE, Kanayama N, Halim A, et al: Stretching of fetal membranes
    col 31:331-336, 1991.                                                              increases the concentration of interleukin-8 and collagenase activity.
17. Gauthier DW, Meyer WJ: Comparison of gram stain, leukocyte esterase                Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:843-849, 1996.
    activity, and amniotic fluid glucose concentration in predicting amniotic       40. Ekwo EE, Gosselink CA, Moawad A: Unfavorable outcome in penultimate
    fluid culture results in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J               pregnancy and premature rupture of membranes in successive pregnancy.
    Obstet Gynecol 167:1092-1095, 1992.                                                Obstet Gynecol 80:166-172, 1982.
18. Mercer BM, Moretti ML, Prevost RR, Sibai BM: Erythromycin therapy in           41. Harger JH, Hsing AW, Tuomala RE, et al: Risk factors for preterm prema-
    preterm premature rupture of the membranes: A prospective, randomized              ture rupture of fetal membranes: A multicenter case-control study. Am J
    trial of 220 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:794-802, 1992.                      Obstet Gynecol 163:130-137, 1990.
CHAPTER 31           Premature Rupture of the Membranes                    609
42. Naeye RL, Peters EC: Causes and consequences of premature rupture of         64. Simpson GF, Harbert GM Jr: Use of β-methasone in management of
    the fetal membranes. Lancet 1:192-194, 1980.                                     preterm gestation with premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol
43. Charles D, Edwards WB: Infectious complications of cervical cerclage.            66:168-175, 1985.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol 141:1065-1070, 1981.                                     65. Gonen R, Hannah ME, Milligan JE: Does prolonged preterm premature
44. Gold RB, Goyer GL, Schwartz, et al: Conservative management of second            rupture of the membranes predispose to abruptio placentae? Obstet
    trimester post-amniocentesis fluid leakage. Obstet Gynecol 74:745-747,            Gynecol 74:347-350, 1989.
    1989.                                                                        66. Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ, Weinbaum PJ: Preterm
45. Hadley CB, Main DM, Gabbe SG: Risk factors for preterm premature                 premature rupture of the membranes: A risk factor for the development
    rupture of the fetal membranes. Am J Perinatol 7:374-379, 1990.                  of abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1235-1238, 1987.
46. Mercer BM, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al, and the National Institutes of     67. Schucker JL, Mercer BM: Midtrimester premature rupture of the mem-
    Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Units                 branes. Semin Perinatol 20:389-400, 1996.
    (NICHD-MFMU) Network: The preterm prediction study: Prediction of            68. Moberg LJ, Garite TJ, Freeman RK: Fetal heart rate patterns and fetal dis-
    preterm premature rupture of the membranes using clinical findings and            tress in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet
    ancillary testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:738-745, 2000.                        Gynecol 64:60-64, 1984.
47. Roberts AK, Monzon-Bordonaba F, Van Deerlin PG, et al: Association of        69. Bengtson JM, VanMarter LJ, Barss VA, et al: Pregnancy outcome after
    polymorphism within the promoter of the tumor necrosis factor alpha              premature rupture of the membranes at or before 26 weeks’ gestation.
    gene with increased risk of preterm premature rupture of the fetal mem-          Obstet Gynecol 73:921-926, 1989.
    branes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1297-1302, 1999.                             70. Beydoun SN, Yasin SY: Premature rupture of the membranes before 28
48. Millar LK, Boesche MH, Yamamoto SY, et al: A relaxin mediated pathway            weeks: Conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:471-479,
    to preterm premature rupture of the fetal membranes that is independent          1986.
    of infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:126-134, 1998.                         71. Mercer BM: Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet
49. Meis PJ, Klebanoff M, Thom E, et al, for the National Institute of Child         Gynecol 101:178-193, 2003.
    Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network:          72. Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, et al: Very low birth weight outcomes of the
    Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogester-           National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal
    one caproate. N Engl J Med 348:2379-2385, 2003.                                  Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neo-
50. da Fonseca EB, Bittar RE, Carvalho MH, Zugaib M: Prophylactic admin-             natal Research Network. Pediatrics 107:E1-E8, 2001.
    istration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence     73. Wu YW, Colford JM Jr: Chorioamnionitis as a risk factor for cerebral
    of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: A randomized            palsy: A meta-analysis. JAMA 284:1417-1424, 2000.
    placebo-controlled double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:419-424,      74. Yoon BH, Jun JK, Romero R, et al: Amniotic fluid inflammatory cytokines
    2003.                                                                            (interleukin-6, interleukin 1b, and tumor necrosis factor-α), neonatal
51. Casanueva E, Ripoll C, Tolentino M, et al: Vitamin C supplementation to          brain white matter lesions, and cerebral palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol
    prevent premature rupture of the chorioamniotic membranes: A random-             177:19-26, 1997.
    ized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 81:859-863, 2005.                                 75. Yoon BH, Romero R, Kim CJ, et al: High expression of tumor necrosis
52. Rumbold A, Crowther CA: Vitamin C supplementation in pregnancy.                  factor-alpha and interleukin-6 in periventricular leukomalacia. Am J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD004072, 2005.                                   Obstet Gynecol 177:406-411, 1997.
53. Mercer BM, Goldenberg RL, Moawad AH, et al: for the National Institutes      76. Yoon BH, Romero R, Yang SH, et al: Interleukin-6 concentrations in
    of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Units              umbilical cord plasma are elevated in neonates with white matter lesions
    (NICHD-MFMU) Network: The preterm prediction study: Effect of ges-               associated with periventricular leukomalacia. Am J Obstet Gynecol
    tational age and cause of preterm birth on subsequent obstetric outcome.         174:1433-1440, 1996.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1216-1221, 1999.                                     77. Locatelli A, Ghidini A, Paterlini G, et al: Gestational age at preterm pre-
54. Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, et al: Induction of labor compared with          mature rupture of membranes: A risk factor for neonatal white matter
    expectant management for prelabor rupture of membranes at term.                  damage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:947-951, 2005.
    N Engl J Med 334:1005-1010, 1996.                                            78. Louis JM, Ehrenberg HM, Collin MF, Mercer BM: Perinatal intervention
55. Wagner MV, Chin VP, Peters CJ, et al: A comparison of early and delayed          and neonatal outcomes near the limit of viability. Am J Obstet Gynecol
    induction of labor with spontaneous rupture of membranes at term.                191:1398-1402, 2004.
    Obstet Gynecol 74:93-97, 1989.                                               79. Kilpatrick SJ, Schlueter MA, Piecuch R, et al: Outcome of infants born at
56. Mercer B, Arheart K: Antimicrobial therapy in expectant management of            24-26 weeks’ gestation. I. Survival and cost. Obstet Gynecol 90:803-808,
    preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Lancet 346:1271-1279,                1997.
    1995.                                                                        80. Bottoms SF, Paul RH, Iams JD, et al: Obstetric determinants of neonatal
57. Johnson JWC, Egerman RS, Moorhead J: Cases with ruptured membranes               survival: Influence of willingness to perform cesarean delivery on survival
    that “reseal.” Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:1024-1032, 1990.                          of extremely low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:960-966,
58. Borgida AF, Mills AA, Feldman DM, et al: Outcome of pregnancies com-             1997.
    plicated by ruptured membranes after genetic amniocentesis. Am J Obstet      81. Dewan H, Morris JM: A systematic review of pregnancy outcome follow-
    Gynecol 183:937-939, 2000.                                                       ing preterm premature rupture of membranes at a previable gestational
59. Gunn GC, Mishell DR, Morton DG: Premature rupture of the fetal mem-              age. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:389-394, 2001.
    branes: A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 106:469-482, 1970.                     82. Vergani P, Ghidini A, Locatelli A, et al: Risk factors for pulmonary hypo-
60. Hillier SL, Martius J, Krohn M, et al: A case-control study of chorioamni-       plasia in second-trimester premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet
    onic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity. N Engl J          Gynecol 170:1359-1364, 1994.
    Med 319:972-978, 1988.                                                       83. Rotschild A, Ling EW, Puterman ML, Farquharson D: Neonatal outcome
61. Morales WJ: The effect of chorioamnionitis on the developmental                  after prolonged preterm rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol
    outcome of preterm infants at one year. Obstet Gynecol 70:183-186,               162:46-52, 1990.
    1987.                                                                        84. van Eyck J, van der Mooren K, Wladimiroff JW: Ductus arteriosus flow
62. Guise JM, Duff P, Christian JS: Management of term patients with pre-            velocity modulation by fetal breathing movements as a measure of fetal
    mature rupture of membranes and an unfavorable cervix. Am J Perinatol            lung development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:558-566, 1990.
    9:56-60, 1992.                                                               85. Hibbard JU, Hibbard MC, Ismail M, Arendt E: Pregnancy outcome after
63. Garite TJ, Freeman RK: Chorioamnionitis in the preterm gestation. Obstet         expectant management of premature rupture of the membranes in the
    Gynecol 59:539-545, 1982.                                                        second trimester. J Reprod Med 38:945-951, 1993.
4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50034-x..docpdf
4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50034-x..docpdf
4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50034-x..docpdf

More Related Content

What's hot

Endometrial hyperplasia.ppt
Endometrial hyperplasia.pptEndometrial hyperplasia.ppt
Endometrial hyperplasia.pptLaxinys
 
Endometrial polyp, hyperplasia, carcinoma
Endometrial polyp, hyperplasia, carcinomaEndometrial polyp, hyperplasia, carcinoma
Endometrial polyp, hyperplasia, carcinomaMohammad Manzoor
 
Initiation and maintainence of endometriosis
Initiation and maintainence of endometriosisInitiation and maintainence of endometriosis
Initiation and maintainence of endometriosisKumgang Media
 
Drug safety (1)
Drug safety (1)Drug safety (1)
Drug safety (1)drmcbansal
 
Post term pregnancy
Post term pregnancyPost term pregnancy
Post term pregnancydrmcbansal
 
Myoma &amp; preg
Myoma &amp; pregMyoma &amp; preg
Myoma &amp; pregmagdy abdel
 
Fibroid complicating pregnancy
Fibroid complicating pregnancyFibroid complicating pregnancy
Fibroid complicating pregnancyMilan Kharel
 
Myoma ho 3rd
Myoma  ho 3rdMyoma  ho 3rd
Myoma ho 3rdgishabay
 
Fibroid complicating pregnancy
Fibroid complicating pregnancyFibroid complicating pregnancy
Fibroid complicating pregnancyMadhava Manoj
 
Fibroid uterus
Fibroid uterusFibroid uterus
Fibroid uterusobgymgmcri
 
Corioamnionitis y funisitis. consecuencias para el neonato
Corioamnionitis y funisitis. consecuencias para el neonatoCorioamnionitis y funisitis. consecuencias para el neonato
Corioamnionitis y funisitis. consecuencias para el neonatoFrank Cajina Gómez
 
Management of ovarian cancer in pregnant woman
Management of ovarian cancer in pregnant womanManagement of ovarian cancer in pregnant woman
Management of ovarian cancer in pregnant womanttongson
 
Adenomyosis and Reproduction
Adenomyosis and Reproduction Adenomyosis and Reproduction
Adenomyosis and Reproduction iCliniq
 

What's hot (19)

Endometrial hyperplasia.ppt
Endometrial hyperplasia.pptEndometrial hyperplasia.ppt
Endometrial hyperplasia.ppt
 
Endometrial polyp, hyperplasia, carcinoma
Endometrial polyp, hyperplasia, carcinomaEndometrial polyp, hyperplasia, carcinoma
Endometrial polyp, hyperplasia, carcinoma
 
Endometrial hyperplasia
Endometrial hyperplasiaEndometrial hyperplasia
Endometrial hyperplasia
 
3. leiomyoma
3. leiomyoma3. leiomyoma
3. leiomyoma
 
Leiomyoma
LeiomyomaLeiomyoma
Leiomyoma
 
Initiation and maintainence of endometriosis
Initiation and maintainence of endometriosisInitiation and maintainence of endometriosis
Initiation and maintainence of endometriosis
 
Drug safety (1)
Drug safety (1)Drug safety (1)
Drug safety (1)
 
Fibroids by mavish
Fibroids by mavishFibroids by mavish
Fibroids by mavish
 
Post term pregnancy
Post term pregnancyPost term pregnancy
Post term pregnancy
 
Myoma &amp; preg
Myoma &amp; pregMyoma &amp; preg
Myoma &amp; preg
 
Fibroid complicating pregnancy
Fibroid complicating pregnancyFibroid complicating pregnancy
Fibroid complicating pregnancy
 
Myoma ho 3rd
Myoma  ho 3rdMyoma  ho 3rd
Myoma ho 3rd
 
Uterine malformation
Uterine malformation Uterine malformation
Uterine malformation
 
Fibroid complicating pregnancy
Fibroid complicating pregnancyFibroid complicating pregnancy
Fibroid complicating pregnancy
 
Fibroid uterus
Fibroid uterusFibroid uterus
Fibroid uterus
 
Corioamnionitis y funisitis. consecuencias para el neonato
Corioamnionitis y funisitis. consecuencias para el neonatoCorioamnionitis y funisitis. consecuencias para el neonato
Corioamnionitis y funisitis. consecuencias para el neonato
 
Management of ovarian cancer in pregnant woman
Management of ovarian cancer in pregnant womanManagement of ovarian cancer in pregnant woman
Management of ovarian cancer in pregnant woman
 
Adenomyosis and Reproduction
Adenomyosis and Reproduction Adenomyosis and Reproduction
Adenomyosis and Reproduction
 
Contraception
ContraceptionContraception
Contraception
 

Similar to 4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50034-x..docpdf

Rotura prematura de membranas
Rotura prematura de membranasRotura prematura de membranas
Rotura prematura de membranasrubenhuaraz
 
Oi vo non - prelabor rupture of membrane - acog guideline 2018
Oi vo non - prelabor rupture of membrane - acog guideline 2018Oi vo non - prelabor rupture of membrane - acog guideline 2018
Oi vo non - prelabor rupture of membrane - acog guideline 2018Võ Tá Sơn
 
Mercer Clin Perinatol 2004, Rpm Diagnosis And Management
Mercer Clin Perinatol 2004, Rpm Diagnosis And ManagementMercer Clin Perinatol 2004, Rpm Diagnosis And Management
Mercer Clin Perinatol 2004, Rpm Diagnosis And ManagementEliana Cordero
 
Premature Rupture Of Membranes
Premature Rupture Of MembranesPremature Rupture Of Membranes
Premature Rupture Of Membranesguest8b10e7
 
Primary maternal care preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
Primary maternal care  preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranesPrimary maternal care  preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
Primary maternal care preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranesSaide OER Africa
 
Maternal Care: Preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
Maternal Care: Preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranesMaternal Care: Preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
Maternal Care: Preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranesSaide OER Africa
 
Preterm labour
Preterm labourPreterm labour
Preterm labourPoly Begum
 
LSCS in Chorioamnionitis at ICCOB 2021 Ahmedabad 181221
LSCS in Chorioamnionitis at ICCOB 2021 Ahmedabad 181221LSCS in Chorioamnionitis at ICCOB 2021 Ahmedabad 181221
LSCS in Chorioamnionitis at ICCOB 2021 Ahmedabad 181221Niranjan Chavan
 
Preterm labour
Preterm labourPreterm labour
Preterm labourdrmcbansal
 
163473537 case-report-katarina-maria-docx
163473537 case-report-katarina-maria-docx163473537 case-report-katarina-maria-docx
163473537 case-report-katarina-maria-docxhomeworkping7
 
Cutting edge in management of recurrent early pregnancy loss
Cutting edge in management of recurrent early pregnancy lossCutting edge in management of recurrent early pregnancy loss
Cutting edge in management of recurrent early pregnancy loss’Mohamed Alajami
 
4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50031-4..docpdf
4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50031-4..docpdf4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50031-4..docpdf
4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50031-4..docpdfLoveis1able Khumpuangdee
 
Miscarriage
 Miscarriage Miscarriage
MiscarriageSam Kyley
 

Similar to 4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50034-x..docpdf (20)

Rotura prematura de membranas
Rotura prematura de membranasRotura prematura de membranas
Rotura prematura de membranas
 
Oi vo non - prelabor rupture of membrane - acog guideline 2018
Oi vo non - prelabor rupture of membrane - acog guideline 2018Oi vo non - prelabor rupture of membrane - acog guideline 2018
Oi vo non - prelabor rupture of membrane - acog guideline 2018
 
RPM, rewiew
RPM, rewiewRPM, rewiew
RPM, rewiew
 
Mercer Clin Perinatol 2004, Rpm Diagnosis And Management
Mercer Clin Perinatol 2004, Rpm Diagnosis And ManagementMercer Clin Perinatol 2004, Rpm Diagnosis And Management
Mercer Clin Perinatol 2004, Rpm Diagnosis And Management
 
Premature Rupture Of Membranes
Premature Rupture Of MembranesPremature Rupture Of Membranes
Premature Rupture Of Membranes
 
Primary maternal care preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
Primary maternal care  preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranesPrimary maternal care  preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
Primary maternal care preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
 
Maternal Care: Preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
Maternal Care: Preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranesMaternal Care: Preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
Maternal Care: Preterm labour and preterm rupture of the membranes
 
ABORTION.ppt
ABORTION.pptABORTION.ppt
ABORTION.ppt
 
Preterm labour
Preterm labourPreterm labour
Preterm labour
 
1006.full
1006.full1006.full
1006.full
 
Lecture 22 Preterm Labor.pptx
Lecture 22 Preterm Labor.pptxLecture 22 Preterm Labor.pptx
Lecture 22 Preterm Labor.pptx
 
LSCS in Chorioamnionitis at ICCOB 2021 Ahmedabad 181221
LSCS in Chorioamnionitis at ICCOB 2021 Ahmedabad 181221LSCS in Chorioamnionitis at ICCOB 2021 Ahmedabad 181221
LSCS in Chorioamnionitis at ICCOB 2021 Ahmedabad 181221
 
Preterm labour
Preterm labourPreterm labour
Preterm labour
 
Preterm labor & PROM
Preterm labor & PROMPreterm labor & PROM
Preterm labor & PROM
 
163473537 case-report-katarina-maria-docx
163473537 case-report-katarina-maria-docx163473537 case-report-katarina-maria-docx
163473537 case-report-katarina-maria-docx
 
Sepsis neo precoz
Sepsis neo precozSepsis neo precoz
Sepsis neo precoz
 
Prom
PromProm
Prom
 
Cutting edge in management of recurrent early pregnancy loss
Cutting edge in management of recurrent early pregnancy lossCutting edge in management of recurrent early pregnancy loss
Cutting edge in management of recurrent early pregnancy loss
 
4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50031-4..docpdf
4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50031-4..docpdf4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50031-4..docpdf
4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50031-4..docpdf
 
Miscarriage
 Miscarriage Miscarriage
Miscarriage
 

More from Loveis1able Khumpuangdee (20)

Rollup01
Rollup01Rollup01
Rollup01
 
Protec
ProtecProtec
Protec
 
Factsheet hfm
Factsheet hfmFactsheet hfm
Factsheet hfm
 
Factsheet
FactsheetFactsheet
Factsheet
 
Eidnotebook54
Eidnotebook54Eidnotebook54
Eidnotebook54
 
Data l3 148
Data l3 148Data l3 148
Data l3 148
 
Data l3 147
Data l3 147Data l3 147
Data l3 147
 
Data l3 127
Data l3 127Data l3 127
Data l3 127
 
Data l3 126
Data l3 126Data l3 126
Data l3 126
 
Data l3 113
Data l3 113Data l3 113
Data l3 113
 
Data l3 112
Data l3 112Data l3 112
Data l3 112
 
Data l3 92
Data l3 92Data l3 92
Data l3 92
 
Data l3 89
Data l3 89Data l3 89
Data l3 89
 
Data l2 80
Data l2 80Data l2 80
Data l2 80
 
Hfm reccomment10072555
Hfm reccomment10072555Hfm reccomment10072555
Hfm reccomment10072555
 
Hfm work2550
Hfm work2550Hfm work2550
Hfm work2550
 
Factsheet hfm
Factsheet hfmFactsheet hfm
Factsheet hfm
 
Publichealth
PublichealthPublichealth
Publichealth
 
แนวทางการดาเน ํ นงานป ิ องก ้ นควบค ั มการระบาดของโรคม ุ ือ เท้า ปาก สําหรบแพ...
แนวทางการดาเน ํ นงานป ิ องก ้ นควบค ั มการระบาดของโรคม ุ ือ เท้า ปาก สําหรบแพ...แนวทางการดาเน ํ นงานป ิ องก ้ นควบค ั มการระบาดของโรคม ุ ือ เท้า ปาก สําหรบแพ...
แนวทางการดาเน ํ นงานป ิ องก ้ นควบค ั มการระบาดของโรคม ุ ือ เท้า ปาก สําหรบแพ...
 
hand foot mouth
hand foot mouthhand foot mouth
hand foot mouth
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NagpurCall Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NagpurRiya Pathan
 
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Hebbal Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablenarwatsonia7
 
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking ModelsMumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Modelssonalikaur4
 
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...narwatsonia7
 
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, PricingPharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, PricingArunagarwal328757
 
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service LucknowVIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknownarwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Service Nandiambakkam | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girls Service Nandiambakkam | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingCall Girls Service Nandiambakkam | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girls Service Nandiambakkam | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingNehru place Escorts
 
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...narwatsonia7
 
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...rajnisinghkjn
 
See the 2,456 pharmacies on the National E-Pharmacy Platform
See the 2,456 pharmacies on the National E-Pharmacy PlatformSee the 2,456 pharmacies on the National E-Pharmacy Platform
See the 2,456 pharmacies on the National E-Pharmacy PlatformKweku Zurek
 
Hemostasis Physiology and Clinical correlations by Dr Faiza.pdf
Hemostasis Physiology and Clinical correlations by Dr Faiza.pdfHemostasis Physiology and Clinical correlations by Dr Faiza.pdf
Hemostasis Physiology and Clinical correlations by Dr Faiza.pdfMedicoseAcademics
 
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsHematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsMedicoseAcademics
 
call girls in green park DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in green park  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in green park  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in green park DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️saminamagar
 
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service BangaloreCall Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalorenarwatsonia7
 
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...saminamagar
 
Call Girls Whitefield Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Whitefield Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Whitefield Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Whitefield Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablenarwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablenarwatsonia7
 
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort ServiceCollege Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort ServiceNehru place Escorts
 
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAAjennyeacort
 
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...narwatsonia7
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NagpurCall Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
 
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Hebbal Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking ModelsMumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
 
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service A...
 
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, PricingPharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
 
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service LucknowVIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
 
Call Girls Service Nandiambakkam | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girls Service Nandiambakkam | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingCall Girls Service Nandiambakkam | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girls Service Nandiambakkam | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
 
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
Housewife Call Girls Bangalore - Call 7001305949 Rs-3500 with A/C Room Cash o...
 
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
 
See the 2,456 pharmacies on the National E-Pharmacy Platform
See the 2,456 pharmacies on the National E-Pharmacy PlatformSee the 2,456 pharmacies on the National E-Pharmacy Platform
See the 2,456 pharmacies on the National E-Pharmacy Platform
 
Hemostasis Physiology and Clinical correlations by Dr Faiza.pdf
Hemostasis Physiology and Clinical correlations by Dr Faiza.pdfHemostasis Physiology and Clinical correlations by Dr Faiza.pdf
Hemostasis Physiology and Clinical correlations by Dr Faiza.pdf
 
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsHematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
 
call girls in green park DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in green park  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in green park  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in green park DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service BangaloreCall Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
 
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
 
Call Girls Whitefield Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Whitefield Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Whitefield Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Whitefield Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort ServiceCollege Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
 
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
 
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
Call Girls Service in Bommanahalli - 7001305949 with real photos and phone nu...
 

4 u1.0-b978-1-4160-4224-2..50034-x..docpdf

  • 1. Chapter 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes Brian M. Mercer, MD Rupture of the fetal membranes is an integral part of the normal par- TIMP-1, TIMP-3), and increased poly[ADP-ribose]polymerase (PARP) turition process at term and is inevitable in the process of preterm cleavage.6,9 Term or preterm uterine contractions can also lead to mem- birth. Spontaneous rupture of the membranes (SROM) at term and brane rupture resulting from increased bursting pressure due to preterm can occur any time before or after the onset of contractions. increased intra-amniotic pressure and from “strain hardening” with SROM before the onset of contractions is referred to as premature repeated uterine contractions. If the fetal membranes do not rupture rupture of the membranes (PROM). Membrane rupture at term before labor, the work to cause membrane rupture at the internal cervi- usually occurs as a result of a physiologic process of progressive mem- cal os decreases with advancing cervical dilatation because of the lack brane weakening. Preterm PROM generally results from pathologic of anchoring to the supportive decidua and enhanced ability to stretch weakening of the fetal membranes, which has several causes. Although with contractions.1 delivery after PROM may be required by the presence of advanced Preterm membrane rupture can arise through a number of path- labor, intrauterine infection, vaginal bleeding due to placental abrup- ways that ultimately result in accelerated membrane weakening. Bacte- tion, or non-reassuring fetal status, the physician often needs to make rial collagenases and proteases can directly cause fetal membrane tissue the decision whether to actively pursue delivery or conservatively weakening.10 An increase in local host cytokines or an imbalance in the manage the pregnancy. Management of PROM hinges on knowledge interaction between MMPs and TIMPs in response to microbial colo- of gestational age, the neonatal risks related to immediate delivery, and nization can have similar effects.11 There is specific evidence linking an understanding of the anticipated clinical course and relative risks urogenital tract infection and colonization with preterm PROM. of intrauterine infection, abruptio placentae, and fetal distress or death Amniotic fluid cultures after PROM are frequently positive (25% from umbilical cord accident or intrauterine infection with conserva- to 35%),12-19 and histologic evaluation in the setting of preterm tive management. birth frequently has demonstrated acute inflammation and bacterial contamination along the choriodecidual interface.20 Although these findings may reflect ascending infection after PROM, it is likely that ascending colonization and infection are directly involved in the Physiology and pathogenesis of preterm PROM in many cases. Genital tract pathogens that have been associated with PROM include Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pathophysiology of Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, and group B β-hemo- Membrane Rupture lytic streptococcus.20-26 Although group B streptococcus (GBS) bacte- riuria has been associated with preterm PROM and low-birth-weight The fetal membranes consist of the amnion, which lines the amniotic infants27 and an association between cervical colonization and preterm cavity, and the thicker chorion, which adheres to the maternal decidua. PROM is possible,28 it does not appear that vaginal GBS carriage is Initially, the amnion and chorion are separate layers. The amnionic sac associated with preterm PROM.29,30 Although there is a well-estab- is visible on first trimester ultrasound scans until it fuses with the lished association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth, chorion by the end of the 14th week of gestation. Subsequently, the including that related to preterm PROM,31,32 it remains unclear whether amnion and chorion are connected by a collagen-rich connective tissue bacterial vaginosis merely identifies women with a predisposition to layer, with the amnion represented by a single cuboidal epithelial abnormal genital tract colonization and inflammation, facilitates amnion layer and subjacent compact and spongy connective tissue ascent of other bacteria to the upper genital tract, or is directly patho- layers, and a thicker chorion consisting of reticular and trophoblastic genic and causative of membrane rupture. Physical effects related to layers. Together, the amnion and chorion form a stronger unit than preterm contractions and prolapsing membranes with premature cer- either layer individually. Physiologic membrane remodeling occurs vical dilatation can predispose the fetal membranes to rupture, as can with advancing gestational age, reflecting changes in collagen content the increased intrauterine pressure seen with polyhydramnios.4,33 It is and type, changes in intercellular matrix, and progressive cellular apop- likely that certain connective tissue disorders (e.g., Ehlers-Danlos syn- tosis. These changes lead to structural weakening of the membranes, drome) can result in intrinsic weakening of the membranes. Clinical which is more evident in the region of the internal cervical os.1-8 associations with preterm PROM include low socioeconomic status, Membrane weakening can be stimulated by exposure to local lean maternal body mass (<19.8 kg/m2), nutritional deficiencies (e.g., matrix metalloproteinases (e.g., MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9), decreased copper, ascorbic acid), and prior cervical conization. During preg- levels of membrane tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (e.g., nancy, maternal cigarette smoking, cervical cerclage, second- and
  • 2. 600 CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes third-trimester bleeding, pulmonary disease, prior episodes of preterm ing result at 22 to 24 weeks had a one-in-six chance (16.7%) of labor or contractions, and uterine overdistention with polyhydramnios delivering a preterm infant because of PROM, and the combination or multiple gestations have been linked to preterm PROM.4,33-45 of a prior preterm birth due to PROM, a short cervical length, and a Although one or more risk factors may lead to membrane rupture, positive fetal fibronectin screening result increased the risk of delivery the ultimate clinical cause of PROM is often not evident at delivery. at less than 35 weeks because of preterm PROM by 10.9-fold (25% In some cases, factors leading to membrane rupture are subacute or versus 2.3%).46 chronic in nature. Women with a prior preterm birth have increased Unfortunately, despite knowledge of a broad range of potential risk risk for preterm birth due to PROM in subsequent pregnancies, factors for preterm birth, we are able to predict only a small fraction especially if the prior preterm delivery resulted from PROM.46 Asymp- of women destined to deliver preterm, and most preterm births due to tomatic women with a short cervical length (<25 mm) remote from preterm labor or PROM occur in women considered to be at low risk delivery are also at increased risk for subsequent preterm birth due to for these events. Ancillary tests such as fetal fibronectin screening or preterm labor or PROM. Some women may have polymorphisms for transvaginal cervical sonography should be incorporated into routine inflammatory proteins that alter their inflammatory response and practice only after effective interventions to prevent PROM have been increase the risk for preterm birth.47,48 identified for those with an abnormal test result. Because most cases of preterm PROM cannot be predicted or prevented, clinical efforts continue to be focused on evaluation and treatment of women who Prediction and Prevention present with symptoms of preterm PROM. Because PROM at term usually is part of the normal parturition process, the focus of efforts has been on the prediction and prevention of preterm birth caused by PROM. Prevention of preterm PROM Clinical Course would be particularly appealing because labor and intrauterine infec- PROM affects approximately 8% of pregnancies at term, and 95% of tion or other complications necessitating delivery often ensue soon these women will deliver within 28 hours of membrane rupture.54 after membrane rupture occurs. The optimal way to prevent complica- Preterm PROM is also associated with brief latency from membrane tions from preterm PROM is to prevent its occurrence. Potentially rupture to delivery; delivery within 1 week is the most common modifiable risk factors for preterm PROM include cigarette smoking, outcome after preterm PROM at any gestational age. On average, poor nutrition, urinary tract and sexually transmitted infections, acute latency increases with decreasing gestational age at membrane rupture. pulmonary diseases, and severe polyhydramnios. When PROM occurs before 34 weeks’ gestation, 93% of women will Other than treatment of infections, it is unknown whether correc- deliver within 1 week, and 50% to 60% of those who are managed tion of these factors can avert this complication. Although most other conservatively will deliver within 1 week.55,56 With PROM near the risk factors are fixed in that they cannot be removed or remedied in a limit of viability, 60% to 70% deliver within 1 week, but 1 in 5 will particular woman, knowledge of risk can help to counsel women about have a latency of 4 or more weeks if they are managed conservatively.35 suspicious symptoms and the importance of timely evaluation if Although the likelihood of spontaneous resealing of the membranes preterm PROM occurs. Broad-based preventive strategies such as pro- after preterm PROM is low (3% to 13%), the prognosis for those with gesterone supplementation can be considered for those at risk due to PROM occurring after amniocentesis is much better, with 86% to 94% less specific risk factors such as a history of spontaneous preterm resealing spontaneously.44,57,58 In a study of women with PROM after birth49,50 (see Chapter 29). Although one study suggested that vitamin second-trimester amniocentesis, leakage stopped in most cases with C supplementation had value in preventing preterm PROM (7.6% conservative management, although a normal fluid volume sometimes versus 24.5%; P = .02), studies in which vitamin C was given alone or took time to re-accumulate (in a range of 8 to 51 days).58 with other supplements to women without prior preterm birth as a risk factor indicate a trend toward increased preterm birth with such treatments (relative risk [RR] = 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.82).51,52 Vitamin C supplementation to prevent preterm birth Complications after due to PROM thus cannot be recommended until there is solid evi- Premature Rupture of dence of benefit. Perhaps the strongest risk factor for preterm PROM is a history of the Membranes prematurity or PROM.53 Those with an early preterm birth have the highest risk for a recurrence. A history of preterm birth after PROM Maternal Complications confers a 3.3-fold increased risk for recurrent preterm birth due to the Chorioamnionitis complicates 9% of pregnancies with term PROM, a same cause (13.5% versus 4.1%; P < .01) and a 13.5-fold higher risk risk that increases to 24% with membrane rupture lasting longer than of subsequent delivery before 28 weeks (1.8% versus 0.13%; P < .01). 24 hours.59 The risk of intrauterine infection increases with the dura- Because prior obstetric outcome has such a strong influence on tion of membrane rupture and with declining gestational age.54,55,60-62 subsequent pregnancy outcomes, it is useful to evaluate nulliparas Conservative management of PROM provides the opportunity for separately from those with prior deliveries. When assessed at 22 to subclinical deciduitis to progress to overt infection and for ascending 24 weeks’ gestation, medical complications (e.g., pulmonary disease in infection to occur.20,54,55,62 Chorioamnionitis can complicate 13% to pregnancy), work during pregnancy, low maternal body mass index 60% of cases when PROM occurs remote from term. Endometritis (<19.8 kg/m2), and bacterial vaginosis are associated with preterm occurs in 2% to 13% of cases.63,64 Placental abruption is diagnosed in birth due to PROM.46 Identification of a cervical length shorter than 4% to 12% of pregnancies complicated by PROM and can occur before 25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound also confers an increased risk of or after the onset of membrane rupture.34,65,66 Maternal sepsis (0.8%) subsequent PROM in nulliparas and multiparas. In this study, nullipa- leading to death (0.14%) is a uncommon complication of preterm ras with a short cervix and a positive cervicovaginal fibronectin screen- PROM occurring near the limit of viability.67
  • 3. CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes 601 reported outcomes of previable PROM may be optimistic because Fetal Complications most studies have been retrospective and have included only patients The risks to the fetus are primarily those related to intrauterine infec- amenable to conservative management. tion, umbilical cord compression, and placental abruption. Fetal heart Fetal lung growth and development can be especially adversely rate patterns consistent with umbilical cord compression due to affected when PROM occurs in the early phases of development.82-87 oligohydramnios are commonly seen after PROM.68 Umbilical cord With PROM occurring during the late pseudoglandular or canalicular prolapse can occur after membrane rupture, particularly with fetal stage of pulmonary development, tracheobronchial collapse or loss of malpresentation, which is more common with preterm gestations. intrinsic factors within the tracheobronchial fluid, or both, may lead Fetal death occurs in 1% to 2% of cases of conservatively managed to failure of the terminal bronchioles and alveoli to develop, with PROM.56 The reported incidence of fetal death after PROM at 16 to resultant failure of lung growth.88-91 Pulmonary hypoplasia develops 28 weeks ranges from 3.8% to 22%.36,69,70 This particularly high risk of over weeks after membrane rupture occurs. It is most accurately fetal loss may reflect increased susceptibility to umbilical cord com- diagnosed pathologically based on radial alveolar counts and lung pression and hypoxia or intrauterine infection, but it may also reflect weights.92,93 In surviving infants, pulmonary hypoplasia is suggested by less aggressive obstetric interventions for fetal compromise before the a small chest circumference with severe respiratory distress or persis- limit of viability. tent pulmonary hypertension and radiographic findings such as small, well-aerated lungs with a bell-shaped chest and elevation of the diaphragm.83,88 Neonatal Complications Overall, pulmonary hypoplasia becomes evident in 0% to 26.5% of Gestational age at delivery is the primary determinant of the frequency infants (mean = 5.9%) delivering after PROM at 16 to 26 weeks’ gesta- and severity of neonatal complications after PROM. Respiratory dis- tion. Early PROM before 20 weeks’ gestation carries the highest poten- tress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, tial for lethal pulmonary hypoplasia (≈50% with PROM before 19 and sepsis are the most common serious acute morbidities, and they weeks’ gestation).83,86-88,94-96 With PROM at 15 to 16 weeks, an amniotic are common with early preterm birth. Neonatal sepsis is twofold more fluid index of 2 cm or less, and a latency of 28 days, the risk of pulmo- common after preterm PROM than after preterm birth due to preterm nary hypoplasia is estimated to be 74% to 82%.97 Lethal pulmonary labor. Neonatal infection can manifest as congenital pneumonia, hypoplasia is uncommon with PROM after 24 to 26 weeks’ gestation sepsis, meningitis, and late-onset bacterial or fungal infection. Early (0% to 1.4%) because there has been adequate alveolar development preterm birth can lead to long-term complications, including chronic to support extrauterine life by this time.83,84,98 However, nonlethal pul- lung disease, visual or hearing difficulties, mental retardation, monary hypoplasia increases the likelihood of pulmonary barotrauma, developmental and motor delay, and cerebral palsy. In general, these including pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and the need for high long-term morbidities are uncommon with delivery after about ventilatory pressures because of poor pulmonary compliance.83,98,99 32 weeks’ gestation.71,72 Cerebral palsy and periventricular leukomala- With prolonged oligohydramnios, restriction deformities can occur in cia have been associated with amnionitis,73 and increased amniotic up to 27% of fetuses.67,83,98-101 fluid cytokines and fetal systemic inflammation have been associated with preterm PROM, periventricular leukomalacia, and cerebral palsy.74-76 This highlights the need for potential neonatal benefit from delayed delivery if conservative management is to be attempted Diagnosis because this delay offers the opportunity for intrauterine infection to In more than 90% of cases, the diagnosis of PROM can be confirmed develop. Alternatively, early gestational age at birth has been associated by clinical assessment, including the combination of history, clinical with neonatal white matter damage (P < .001) after controlling for examination, and laboratory evaluation. Because optimal clinical care other factors.77 Despite the described associations between PROM, requires an accurate diagnosis, attention should be paid to confirming intrauterine infection or inflammation, and adverse neurologic out- the diagnosis when a suspicious history or ultrasound finding of oli- comes, it has not been shown that immediate delivery after PROM can gohydramnios is identified. Other potentially confounding findings prevent these morbidities. such as urine leakage, increased vaginal discharge with cervical dilata- In the past, mid-trimester PROM, which encompasses membrane tion or membrane prolapse, cervical infection, passage of the mucous rupture occurring at about 16 to 26 weeks’ gestation, was considered plug, and the presence of semen or vaginal douching should be as a separate entity from preterm PROM because neonatal death considered. usually could be anticipated with immediate delivery. With current A sterile speculum examination should be performed to provide survival rates of about 25% to 85% after delivery at 23 to 26 weeks’ confirmatory evidence of membrane rupture and to inspect for cervi- gestation, mid-trimester PROM is no longer a relevant clinical citis and for umbilical cord or fetal prolapse, to assess cervical dilata- entity.71,72,78-80 Previable PROM occurring before the limit of viability tion and effacement, and to obtain cultures, including endocervical (i.e., before 23 weeks’ gestation) is a special circumstance that places Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis, and anovaginal the fetus in particular jeopardy. Immediate delivery will result in Streptococcus agalactiae (i.e., GBS), as appropriate. Initially, digital neonatal death. Conservative management may result in fetal or cervical examination should be avoided unless imminent delivery is neonatal loss before viability, and if viability is reached, delivery is anticipated because the needed information usually can be obtained likely at an early gestational age, when the risks of long-term sequelae with visualization of the cervix. Digital examination can shorten are highest. The neonatal survival rate after PROM occurring before latency between membrane rupture and delivery, and some studies 24 weeks has previously been reported to be approximately 30%, com- have shown it to introduce vaginal organisms into the cervical canal pared with 57% for rupture at 24 to 26 weeks’ gestation.67 In a review and to increase the risk of infection.102-107 of 201 cases from 11 studies, the perinatal survival rate with conserva- The diagnosis of membrane rupture is confirmed by visualization tive management of PROM before 23 weeks’ gestation was 21%, but of fluid passing from the cervical canal. If the diagnosis is not con- there was similar survival after PROM at less than 20 weeks.81 These firmed on initial inspection, the pH of the vaginal side walls or pooled
  • 4. 602 CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes vaginal fluid can be evaluated using Nitrazine paper, which turns blue of fluid across a weakened membrane or minimal leakage around a at a pH above 6.0 to 6.5. Amniotic fluid usually has a pH of 7.1 to 7.3, firmly applied presenting fetal part. Women with a suspicious history whereas normal vaginal secretions have a pH of about 4.5 to 6.0. Blood and initially negative testing should be encouraged to return for reeval- or semen contamination, alkaline antiseptics, and bacterial vaginosis uation if symptoms are persistent or recurrent. can cause false-positive Nitrazine test results. If further clarification is needed, microscopic inspection can be performed for the presence of arborized crystals (i.e., ferning) (Fig. 31-1) in an air-dried sample col- lected from the vaginal side walls or pooled vaginal fluid. Ferning Management of Premature results from the interaction of amniotic fluid proteins and salts. Cervi- cal mucus should be avoided during sampling because it can also yield Rupture of the Membranes a ferning pattern on microscopy. The fern test is unaffected by meco- Management of PROM is based primarily on the estimated risks for nium and vaginal pH, but it can be falsely positive if there is heavy fetal and neonatal complications with immediate delivery weighed blood contamination.108,109 Prolonged leakage with minimal residual against the potential risks and benefits of conservative management to fluid can lead to false-negative clinical, Nitrazine, and ferning test extend the pregnancy after membrane rupture (Fig. 31-2). The risks of results. Re-examination after prolonged recumbency or alternate mea- maternal morbidity should also be considered, especially under the sures can be considered if initial testing is negative. Assessment of circumstance of previable PROM. cervicovaginal secretions for fetal fibronectin, prolactin, human cho- rionic gonadotropin (hCG), and other markers may assist in the diag- nosis of PROM. However, these tests usually are not more helpful than Initial Evaluation the initial measures listed previously, because a positive test result After the diagnosis of membrane rupture is confirmed, the duration may reflect decidual disruption rather than membrane rupture in of membrane rupture should be estimated to assist the pediatric some cases and a negative test result cannot exclude the diagnosis caregivers with subsequent management decisions. Gestational age unequivocally. is established based on the combination of menstrual dates, clinical If the diagnosis remains unclear after initial evaluation, documen- history, and ultrasound findings, as appropriate. Fetal presentation is tation of oligohydramnios by ultrasound, in the absence of fetal urinary assessed, and the patient is evaluated for labor, clinical findings of tract malformations or significant growth restriction, is suggestive of intrauterine infection, and significant vaginal bleeding. Fetal well- membrane rupture. Ultrasonographically guided amniocentesis with being is assessed by continuous heart rate monitoring if the limit of infusion of indigo carmine dye (1 mL of dye in 9 mL of sterile normal viability has been reached. After preterm PROM, it is important to saline), followed by observation for passage of blue fluid from the evaluate fetal growth and residual amniotic fluid volume by ultra- vagina onto a perineal pad, can confirm or disprove the diagnosis of sound, and the potential of fetal abnormalities that can lead to poly- membrane rupture. Amniocentesis in the setting of oligohydramnios hydramnios should be considered. Although narrowing of the biparietal can be difficult, and particular attention should be paid to avoidance diameter (i.e., dolichocephaly) due to oligohydramnios or breech pre- of the umbilical cord vessels, which can have the appearance of a thin, sentation can result in underestimation of gestational age and fetal linear fluid space under this circumstance. weight, ultrasound usually is as reliable after PROM as it is with intact Some women with a history suspicious for membrane rupture but membranes.110 Tables using fetal head circumference rather than bipa- a negative speculum examination result and a normal amniotic fluid rietal diameter can be consulted as needed. GBS carrier status should volume on ultrasound subsequently return with gross membrane be ascertained if available from culture results within 6 weeks or there rupture. This pattern may reflect initial transudation of a small amount has been a positive urine culture in the current pregnancy, and the need for intrapartum prophylaxis should be determined. In the absence of available culture results, a risk factor–based approach should be used for prevention of vertical transmission.111 If conservative management is planned, the patient should be cared for in a facility with the ability to provide emergent delivery for pla- cental abruption, fetal malpresentation, or fetal distress. The facility should also have neonatal intensive care facilities and offer acute neonatal resuscitation, because conservative management usually is undertaken only if there is a significant risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality with immediate delivery. Prenatal maternal transfer should be undertaken early in the course of management if these resources are not available. Because of the potential for acute complications, outpatient management usually is not recommended when PROM occurs after the limit of viability. Term Premature Rupture of the Membranes FIGURE 31-1 Ferning. A typical ferning appearance is seen after a There is no substantial fetal benefit to expectant management of preg- swab from the posterior vaginal fornix was smeared on glass slide nancy after membrane rupture at 37 weeks’ gestation or later. Expect- and the specimen allowed to air dry. The sample was obtained from a ant management of PROM at term was practiced in the 1980s and early patient with premature rupture of the membranes. (Image courtesy of 1990s based on studies suggesting that immediate induction after term Thomas Garite, University of California at Irvine, Orange, California.) PROM might increase the risks of infection and cesarean delivery.112-115
  • 5. CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes 603 Diagnosis confirmed Fluid per cervical os or vaginal pool with positive Nitrazine/ferning test or indigo carmine amnio infusion Ultrasound for gestational age, growth, anomalies as appropriate Cervical cultures: Chlamydia, gonorrhea Anovaginal culture: group B streptococcus Urine culture: group B streptococcus Initial and continuous monitoring for labor, fetal distress Intrapartum group B streptococcus prophylaxis, Amnionitis, based on risk factors if no abruptio placentae, Yes recent negative fetal death, Deliver anovaginal culture non-reassuring testing, or advanced labor Broad-spectrum antibiotics if amnionitis No Previable PROM Early Preterm PROM Preterm PROM Late Preterm PROM Term PROM 23 weeks 23-31 weeks 32-33 weeks 34-36 weeks 37 weeks Documented fetal Yes Initial monitoring pulmonary maturity for infection, labor, abruptio No placentae Immature testing Initial bed rest or to encourage fluid unavailable resealing Conservative management Modified bed rest/pelvic rest to encourage resealing, reduce infection Evaluate for Consider conservative persistent Serial evaluation for management for oligohydramnios amnionitis, labor, corticosteroid benefit and pulmonary abruption, fetal with concurrent hypoplasia with well-being, growth antibiotic therapy, serial ultrasound or Administer corticosteroids expeditious delivery if and antibiotics (NICHD previous antenatal Re-counsel protocol) short-term steroids and attempted tocolysis latency 1 week Induction If discharged with before viability not planned Deliver for amnionitis, oxytocin, and remains non-reassuring fetal PGE2 or pregnant, testing, abruption, misoprostol, readmit at advanced labor 33 weeks or fetal viability for 32 weeks Deliver dilatation and conservative Deliver at Expeditious Expeditious Deliver at 34 weeks if 34 weeks after evacuation management stable until then delivery delivery steroids Intrapartum group B streptococcus prophylaxis based on risk factors if no recent negative anovaginal culture Broad-spectrum antibiotics if amnionitis FIGURE 31-2 Algorithm for management of premature rupture of the membranes (PROM). The algorithm includes several alternatives for the approach to term and preterm PROM. NICHD, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; PGE2, prostaglandin E2. (Adapted from Mercer BM: Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 101:178-193, 2003.)
  • 6. 604 CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes However, four large studies have since found that induction with oxy- conservative management of PROM is highlighted by the high inci- tocin after term PROM does not increase the risks of maternal or neo- dence of recurrent variable decelerations found during intermittent natal infections, nor does it make cesarean delivery more likely.54,116-118 monitoring (19.4%) among conservatively managed women. In this In the largest study, oxytocin induction after term PROM reduced the study, documented fetal pulmonary maturity was a requirement for duration of membrane rupture (17.2 versus 33.3 hours; P < .001) and enrollment, and neither group suffered any significant noninfectious the frequencies of chorioamnionitis (4.0% versus 8.6%; P < .001) and neonatal morbidities. Specific attention to those enrolled at 32 to 33 postpartum febrile morbidity (1.9% versus 3.6%; P = .008), without weeks’ gestation revealed similar trends regarding brief latency, increasing the risk of cesarean delivery (13.7% versus 14.1%) or neo- increased amnionitis, suspected neonatal sepsis, and antibiotic treat- natal infections (2.0% versus 2.8%).54 Neonatal antibiotic therapy was ment with conservative management.130 Based on these findings, the less common with immediate induction (7.5% versus 13.7%; P < .001), woman with PROM and documented fetal pulmonary maturity at 32 likely because of a lower concern regarding the potential for neonatal to 33 weeks’ gestation is at low risk for complications after immediate infection with less frequent prolonged rupture of the membranes and delivery and increased risk with conservative management. Amniotic less chorioamnionitis. Meta-analysis of studies comparing prostaglan- fluid studies documenting pulmonary maturity in this gestational age din induction and conservative management in this setting has found range are useful to identify women who should be offered expeditious shorter latency, decreased rates of chorioamnionitis, and less frequent delivery. neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions with no increase in If fetal pulmonary testing reveals an immature result or if amniotic cesarean delivery rates with prostaglandin administration.119 Because fluid cannot be obtained for assessment, conservative management oxytocin can more easily be discontinued, this choice is somewhat with antenatal corticosteroid administration for fetal maturation is an more appealing, given similar efficacy for labor induction. appropriate choice. Concurrent antibiotic treatment should be given In summary, available data indicate that women with PROM at to reduce the risk of intrauterine infection during conservative term who are not in labor on arrival at the hospital should have labor management (discussed later). There are no data regarding optimal induced, usually with an oxytocin infusion, to reduce the risk of mater- management after antenatal corticosteroid treatment is completed. nal and neonatal complications. Caregivers should allow an adequate However, because conservative management increases the risks of time for the latent phase of labor and minimize digital vaginal exami- chorioamnionitis and prolonged hospitalization and because it is nations until the active phase of labor. unlikely that conservative management for less than 1 week will result in further significant spontaneous fetal maturation, delivery should be Preterm Premature Rupture of considered if elective delivery is planned within 7 days after antenatal corticosteroid benefit has been achieved. If antenatal corticosteroids the Membranes at 32 to 36 are not to be given to accelerate fetal pulmonary maturity after PROM Weeks’ Gestation at 32 to 33 weeks, consideration should be given to the potential Although infants born at 34 to 36 weeks’ gestation (i.e., late preterm benefits of expeditious delivery unless conservative management to birth) have a higher risk of complications than term infants, severe extend latency for 1 or more weeks will be attempted. These decisions acute morbidities and mortality are uncommon, and antenatal corti- should take into consideration local population-based risks of infec- costeroids for fetal maturation are not typically recommended in this tion and neonatal morbidities. gestational age range.71,120 Conservative management of PROM at 34 to 36 weeks prolongs pregnancy by only days, significantly increases Preterm Premature Rupture of the risk of chorioamnionitis (16% versus 2%; P = .001), and reduces umbilical cord pH (7.35 versus 7.25; P = .009), and it has not been the Membranes at 23 to 31 shown to improve neonatal outcomes.121,122 For these reasons, women Weeks’ Gestation presenting with late preterm PROM at 34 to 36 weeks should be Because delivery before 32 weeks’ gestation is associated with a high risk actively delivered. for perinatal death, severe neonatal morbidities, and long-term sequelae, With delivery at 32 to 33 weeks’ gestation, gestational age–depen- women with PROM between 23 and 31 weeks’ gestation usually should dent neonatal morbidities, including respiratory distress syndrome, be managed expectantly to prolong pregnancy unless there is evidence can occur, but the likelihood of survival is high, and chronic morbidi- of intrauterine infection, suspected placental abruption, advanced ties are uncommon. Amniotic fluid can be collected from the vaginal labor, or a non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern. Under certain addi- pool at initial sterile speculum examination or by amniocentesis if tional circumstances, delivery may be appropriate despite an early ges- vaginal fluid is not available. Each of the TDx/TdXFLx FLM II assay tational age at membrane rupture (e.g., fetal transverse lie and back up (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), the lecithin-to-sphingomyelin with coexisting advanced cervical dilatation, human immunodeficiency ratio (L/S ratio), and the phosphatidylglycerol (PG) test can predict virus infection, primary herpes simplex virus infection). pulmonary maturity when performed on vaginal pool specimens.123-128 In women with conservatively managed PROM remote from term, Modest reductions in the duration of neonatal hospital stay and hyper- a low initial amniotic fluid volume (amniotic fluid index <5.0 cm or bilirubinemia with conservative management of PROM at 32 to 33 maximum vertical fluid pocket <2.0 cm) is associated with shorter weeks’ gestation have been reported.122 Alternatively, conservative latency to delivery and increased neonatal morbidity (including respi- management prolonged pregnancy only briefly (36 versus 14 hours; ratory distress syndrome) but not with increased maternal or neonatal P < .001) in a randomized, controlled trial of conservative manage- infection after PROM.131 Despite this, the predictive value of a low ment versus immediate induction after PROM at 32 to 36 weeks’ gesta- amniotic fluid volume for adverse outcomes is poor. A short cervical tion. This limited benefit was offset by a 2.5-fold increased risk of length on endovaginal ultrasound after preterm PROM has been asso- chorioamnionitis (27.7% versus 10.9%; P = .06), increased neonatal ciated with shorter latency to delivery.132-134 The latest study of cervical sepsis workups (59.6% versus 28.3%; P =.003) and increased neonatal length in women with preterm PROM found that 83% of women antibiotic treatment for suspected infection (78.7% versus 34.8%; P < delivered within 7 days if the initial cervical length was 1 to 10 mm, .001).129 The potential for occult umbilical cord compression during compared with 18% for a cervical length more than 30 mm, but only
  • 7. CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes 605 41 women were evaluated.132 However, currently available studies of roid administration after preterm PROM has been extensively studied, initial amniotic fluid volume and cervical length assessment in women generating several meta-analyses.145-147 Although early reviews pro- with preterm PROM have insufficient power and consistency to guide duced conflicting conclusions about the utility of antenatal corticoste- management. roid treatment after PROM, a later meta-analysis concluded that Conservative management includes initial prolonged continuous antenatal glucocorticoids significantly reduce the risks of respiratory fetal heart rate and maternal contraction monitoring to assess fetal distress syndrome (20% versus 35.4%), intraventricular hemorrhage well-being and identify occult contractions and evidence of umbilical (7.5% versus 15.9%), and necrotizing enterocolitis (0.8% versus 4.6%), cord compression. If initial testing results are reassuring, the patient without increasing the risks of maternal (9.2% versus 5.1%) or neo- can be transferred to an inpatient unit or transferred to a facility natal (7.0% versus 6.6%) infections in women with preterm PROM.147 capable of emergent delivery and acute neonatal resuscitation for Multivariate analysis of prospective observational trials suggested a modified bed rest. Because of the high risk of heart rate abnormalities benefit of antenatal corticosteroid use regardless of membrane due to umbilical cord compression (32% to 76%), fetal assessment rupture.148 Three studies in which prophylactic antibiotics were given should be performed at least daily for those with initially reassuring concurrent to antenatal corticosteroids found treatment to reduce test results.68,135 Continuous monitoring may be appropriate for women respiratory distress syndrome (18.4% versus 43.6%; P = .03) perinatal with intermittent fetal heart rate decelerations but otherwise reassur- mortality (1.3% versus 8.3%; P = .05), and composite morbidities ing findings. Although the nonstress test and biophysical profile have (29.3% versus 48.6%; P < .05), with no increase in perinatal the ability to confirm fetal well-being in the setting of preterm PROM, infections.149-151 fetal heart rate monitoring can identify variable and late decelerations The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel in addition to uterine activity. Biophysical profile testing may also be recommended a single course of antenatal corticosteroids for women confounded by the presence of oligohydramnios but can be helpful if with PROM before 30 to 32 weeks’ gestation in the absence of intra- the nonstress test is equivocal, particularly remote from term when the amniotic infection.152 Data regarding repeated weekly courses of fetal heart rate pattern is less likely to be reactive. A nonreactive result antenatal corticosteroids after preterm PROM are conflicting. In a for a nonstress test and a biophysical profile score of 6 or less within retrospective study that controlled for gestational age and other factors, 24 hours of delivery have been associated with perinatal infection.136,137 two or more courses of antenatal corticosteroids were associated with A nonreactive nonstress test subsequent to an initially reactive result increased early neonatal sepsis (15.3% versus 2% for a single course or should be considered suspicious. 1.5% for no courses; P < .001).153 In another retrospective analysis of Conservative management requires surveillance for the devel- repeated antenatal corticosteroids, there was no reduction in respira- opment of labor, abruptio placentae, and intrauterine infection. tory distress syndrome, but intraventricular hemorrhage and amnio- Chorioamnionitis confers increased risks of perinatal mortality and nitis were less common, and there was a trend toward less sepsis.154 intraventricular hemorrhage, and it is diagnosed clinically by the pres- Respiratory distress syndrome was less common in another retrospec- ence of maternal fever above 38.0 °C (100.4 °F) with uterine tenderness tive review of repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroids (34.9% or with maternal or fetal tachycardia in the absence of another evident versus 45.2%) without an increase in neonatal sepsis (9.9% versus source of infection.63 After the diagnosis of chorioamnionitis is made, 6.2%).155 delivery should be pursued and broad-spectrum antibiotics should be Based on current evidence that antenatal corticosteroids are effec- initiated because treatment before delivery has been shown to decrease tive for induction of fetal pulmonary maturity without increasing the the incidence of neonatal sepsis.138-140 Although evaluation of the mater- risk of infection and that most women will remain pregnant for the 24 nal white blood cell count can be helpful if clinical findings are equivo- to 48 hours needed to achieve corticosteroid benefit after PROM, a cal, the counts can be artificially elevated within 5 to 7 days of antenatal single course of antenatal corticosteroids should be considered when corticosteroid administration. If the diagnosis of chorioamnionitis is PROM occurs before 32 weeks’ gestation and for women with suspected but additional confirmation is needed, amniocentesis may documented pulmonary immaturity at 32 to 33 weeks’ gestation. yield helpful results.15,141,142 A glucose concentration below 16 to 20 mg/ Betamethasone (two doses of 12 mg IM, given 24 hours apart) or dL (sensitivity and specificity of 80% to 90% for a positive culture) and dexamethasone (four doses of 6 mg IM, given 12 hours apart) is con- a Gram stain positive for bacteria (sensitivity of 36% to 80% and speci- sidered appropriate. Repeated weekly antenatal corticosteroids are not ficity of 80% to 97% for a positive culture) support the presence of recommended after preterm PROM. The benefits and risks of a single intrauterine infection. The presence of leukocytes alone in amniotic rescue course remote from initial corticosteroid administration remain fluid after PROM is not well correlated with intrauterine infection. to be determined. Although a positive amniotic fluid culture supports clinical suspicion of chorioamnionitis (sensitivity of 65% to 85% and specificity of 85%), Adjunctive Antibiotics these results are not likely to be available before the diagnosis is clari- Antibiotic therapy is given during conservative management of fied.17 One study suggested that determination of glucose levels from preterm PROM to treat or prevent ascending decidual infection to vaginally collected amniotic fluid may be a simple and noninvasive prolong pregnancy and to reduce gestational age–dependent morbid- method for identification of intra-amniotic infection.143 In this promis- ity while limiting the risk of neonatal infection. More than two dozen ing study, a vaginal pool glucose value below 5 mg/dL had a 74.2% randomized clinical trials have been summarized in several meta- accuracy rate for identifying women with a positive amniotic fluid analyses.56,156,157 In the latest one, antibiotic treatment after preterm culture. Although research has found elevated amniotic fluid interleu- PROM significantly reduced chorioamnionitis (relative risk [RR] = kin levels to be associated with early delivery and perinatal infectious 0.57); delivery within 48 hours (RR = 0.71) and within 7 days (RR = morbidity,141 such testing is not available in most clinical laboratories. 0.80); and reduced infant morbidities, including neonatal infection (RR = 0.68); and major cerebral abnormalities on ultrasound before Antenatal Corticosteroids discharge (RR = 0.82) compared with placebo therapy.157 The need for Respiratory distress syndrome is the most common acute morbidity surfactant administration (RR = 0.83) and oxygen therapy (RR = 0.88) after conservatively managed preterm PROM.144 Antenatal corticoste- was also reduced. Antibiotics did not influence the risk of necrotizing
  • 8. 606 CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes enterocolitis (RR = 1.14; CI, 0.66 to 1.97). Oral amoxicillin-clavulanic longation, less need for oxygen therapy, and fewer positive neonatal acid treatment was associated with increased necrotizing enterocolitis blood cultures.157 This is not inconsistent with the NICHD-MFMU (RR = 4.60; 95% CI, 1.98 to 10.72) in this analysis, but oral erythro- approach. Up to a 7-day course of parenteral and oral therapy using mycin therapy was not (RR = 1.00; CI, 0.56 to 1.80).157 The study that ampicillin-amoxicillin and erythromycin is recommended for women dominated this meta-analysis included women with PROM up to 36 undergoing conservative management of preterm PROM remote from weeks’ gestation and included a population at low risk for necrotizing term. Shortages in intravenous and oral antibiotics have led to the need enterocolitis overall (i.e., 0.5% among controls), and it was the only for alternative antibiotic choices. Oral ampicillin, erythromycin, and one of 10 studies that found a significant increase in necrotizing azithromycin are likely appropriate alternatives if needed. enterocolitis with antibiotic therapy.158 The meta-analysis found treat- Adjunctive antibiotic administration to prolong latency must be ment with “all penicillins” (excluding amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) distinguished from intrapartum prophylaxis to prevent vertical trans- versus placebo to be associated with fewer births within 48 hours and mission of GBS from mother to baby.111 Known GBS carriers and those 7 days of PROM, less overall maternal infection and chorioamnionitis, who deliver before carrier status can be determined should receive less neonatal infection, fewer positive neonatal blood cultures, and intrapartum prophylaxis to prevent vertical transmission, regardless of fewer major intracranial cerebral ultrasound abnormalities. Because of prior antibiotic treatments. Women with a diagnosis of chorioamnio- the increased risk of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis with amoxicil- nitis should receive broad-spectrum intrapartum antibiotic therapy. lin-clavulanate, the study authors recommended erythromycin as a better choice, even though benefits were limited to reduction in deliv- Tocolysis ery at 48 hours, fewer positive neonatal blood cultures, and a reduced Evidence from prospective studies of tocolysis after PROM is similar need for oxygen therapy. to that from studies of tocolysis for preterm labor with intact In a clinical trial with adequate power to evaluate antibiotic therapy membranes.162-167 After preterm PROM, prophylactic tocolysis with β- during conservative management of women with preterm PROM agonists before the onset of contractions can prolong pregnancy briefly. before 32 weeks’ gestation, the National Institutes of Child Health and Therapeutic tocolysis administered only after contractions occur has Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Units (NICHD- not been shown to be effective in prolonging latency. In a retrospective MFMU) Research Network assigned women with PROM to initial comparison of aggressive tocolysis with limited treatment for contrac- aggressive intravenous therapy for 48 hours (2 g of ampicillin IV every tions only during the first 48 hours, aggressive therapy was not associ- 6 hours and 250 mg of erythromycin IV every 6 hours) followed by ated with longer latency (3.8 versus 4.5 days; P = .16).167 A report from oral therapy for 5 days (250 mg of amoxicillin PO every 8 hours and the Collaborative Study on Antenatal Steroids suggested tocolytic 333 mg of enteric-coated erythromycin base PO every 8 hours) to use after PROM was associated with subsequent neonatal respiratory provide limited-duration, broad-spectrum antimicrobial coverage distress syndrome, but the biologic mechanism for this association is before delivery.144,159 GBS screening was performed. GBS carriers were unclear.168 treated with ampicillin for 1 week and again in labor, and they were Overall, the available prospective studies have not found tocolytic analyzed separately. Antibiotic treatment increased the likelihood of treatment after PROM to increase or prevent neonatal morbidities continued pregnancy after 7 days of treatment by twofold. Benefit after PROM. Tocolytic therapy has not been studied when antenatal persisted for 3 weeks after randomization despite discontinuation of corticosteroids and antibiotics were administered concurrently, and antibiotics at 7 days. Babies born to women treated with ampicillin it remains plausible that prophylactic tocolysis could delay delivery plus erythromycin had a reduced incidence of one or more major long enough to allow antibiotic suppression of subclinical decidual infant morbidities (53% versus 44% rate of composite morbidity, infection and for corticosteroid effects on the fetus. Pending further including death, respiratory distress syndrome, early sepsis, severe study in this area, tocolytic therapy should not be considered an intraventricular hemorrhage, and severe necrotizing enterocolitis; P < expected practice after preterm PROM, but it may be appropriate in .05). Antibiotic therapy also significantly reduced individual gesta- pregnancies at high risk for neonatal complications with early preterm tional age–dependent morbidities, including respiratory distress syn- birth. drome (40.5% versus 48.7%), patent ductus arteriosus (11.7% versus 20.2%), chronic lung disease (bronchopulmonary dysplasia: 20.5% Cervical Cerclage versus 13.0%), and stage 3 or 4 necrotizing enterocolitis (2.3% versus Preterm PROM complicates about one fourth of pregnancies with a 5.8%), with P values of 0.05 or less for each. Chorioamnionitis was cervical cerclage and one half of pregnancies requiring an emergent reduced with the study’s antibiotics (23% versus 32.5%; P = .01), and cerclage.43,169,170 Because no prospective studies have been performed neonatal sepsis (8.4% versus 15.6%; P = .009) and pneumonia (2.9% regarding management of preterm PROM with a cerclage in situ, rec- versus 7.0%; P = .04) were reduced for those who were not GBS carri- ommendations reflect the data available from retrospective cohorts. ers. The antibiotic study group had less neonatal GBS sepsis (0% versus The risk of adverse perinatal outcomes does not appear to be different 1.5%; P = .03). Two other studies have attempted to determine whether when PROM occurs with a cerclage or without one, provided the cer- antibiotic therapy of shorter duration could provide similar benefit, clage is removed on admission after PROM.171-172 but the studies lacked size and power to demonstrate equivalent Several small studies comparing pregnancies of preterm PROM in effectiveness.160,161 which the cerclage was retained or removed have yielded consistent In summary, broad-spectrum antibiotic (ampicillin-amoxicillin patterns.173-175 No study has found cerclage retention after PROM to plus erythromycin) therapy for women with preterm PROM before 32 reduce the frequency or severity of infant morbidities after preterm weeks’ gestation prolongs pregnancy sufficiently to reduce neonatal PROM, and each has demonstrated statistically insignificant trends gestational age–dependent morbidities and reduce the frequencies of toward increased maternal infectious morbidity with only brief preg- maternal and neonatal infections.144 An alternative conclusion from nancy prolongation. One study found increased infant mortality and the latest meta-analysis is that penicillins other than amoxicillin- mortality due to sepsis with cerclage retention after PROM.173 One clavulanic acid are an acceptable treatment for preterm PROM and study that compared different practices at two institutions found that the benefits of erythromycin are limited to brief pregnancy pro- longer latencies with cerclage retention, but this finding could reflect
  • 9. CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes 607 population or practice differences at these institutions rather than the specific neonatal outcomes after previable PROM is extremely difficult effect of cerclage retention.174 because it is not possible to predict extended latency, the ultimate Because cerclage retention after PROM has not been shown to gestational age at delivery, or the degree of neonatal pulmonary hypo- improve perinatal outcomes and there are potential risks related to plasia at the time of initial presentation with PROM. leaving the cerclage in situ, removal is recommended when PROM For women who decide that the risks of conservative management occurs, particularly if the indication for initial cerclage placement was exceed the potential benefits, delivery can usually be accomplished not strong. While deferred removal might enhance pregnancy prolon- with vaginal prostaglandin E2, oral or vaginal prostaglandin E1 (i.e., gation for corticosteroid administration, the risks and benefits of this misoprostol), with a high-dose oxytocin infusion, or by dilatation and approach have not been determined. evacuation. The optimal approach depends on the patient’s character- istics (e.g., gestational age, evident amnionitis, prior cesarean delivery) Maternal Herpes Simplex Virus Infection and preference, the available facilities, and the physician’s experience Neonatal herpes simplex infection most commonly results from direct with these techniques. maternal-fetal transmission at delivery, but hematogenous transmis- Data to guide the management for women who choose conservative sion can occur to the fetus in utero in some cases. Neonatal infection management of previable PROM are lacking. There is no consensus rates after primary and secondary maternal infections occur in 34% to about the advantages of inpatient versus outpatient management. 80% and 1% to 5% of cases, respectively,176,177 and infection can result Initial inpatient evaluation may include strict bed and pelvic rest to in mortality rates of 50% to 60% and serious sequelae in up to 50% enhance the opportunity for resealing and for early identification of of survivors.178,179 infection and placental abruption. Women who are discharged should Based on two case series including a total of 35 women with an be advised to abstain from intercourse and limit physical activity. They active maternal genital herpesvirus infection, it has been generally should return immediately in case of fever, abdominal pains, suspi- accepted that increasing latency after membrane rupture of more than cious vaginal discharge, or any vaginal bleeding. Hospitalization for 4 to 6 hours increases risk of neonatal infection and that cesarean the duration of amniotic fluid leakage may be appropriate in some delivery should be performed expeditiously to prevent fetal infection circumstances. Discharged patients are typically readmitted to hospital in this setting.180-182 However, a case series of women with conserva- after the limit of viability has been reached to allow early intervention tively managed PROM before 32 weeks’ gestation coincident to active for infection, placental abruption, labor, and non-reassuring fetal heart recurrent herpes simplex virus lesions suggests that conservative man- rate patterns. Administration of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal agement may be considered.183 Antenatal corticosteroids and antibiot- maturation at this time is appropriate. ics were not administered, and antiviral therapy was inconsistent in After an initial ultrasound assessment, repeated evaluation can be this series. Cesarean delivery was performed for women with active performed every 1 to 2 weeks to determine whether there is re-accu- lesions at the time of delivery. After latencies ranging from 1 to 35 days, mulation of amniotic fluid and to evaluate lung growth. Persistent, none of the 26 infants developed neonatal herpes infection (CI, 0% to severe oligohydramnios after PROM before 20 weeks is the strongest 10.4%). predictor of subsequent lethal pulmonary hypoplasia. Serial fetal bio- Based on these data, conservative management of PROM com- metric evaluation (e.g., lung length, chest circumference), ratios to plicated by recurrent maternal herpes simplex virus infection may adjust for overall fetal size (thoracic to abdominal circumference, tho- be appropriate if membrane rupture occurs remote from term and racic circumference to femur length) and Doppler studies of fetal pul- the potential for mortality or serious sequelae with delivery is consid- monary artery and ductus arteriosus waveform modulation with fetal ered to be high. Antiviral therapy (e.g., acyclovir) during conserva- breathing movements can demonstrate whether fetal pulmonary tive management can reduce viral shedding and the frequency of growth has occurred over time. These results have a high predictive recurrence. value for neonatal mortality due to pulmonary hypoplasia.88,96,185-190 If pulmonary hypoplasia becomes evident before the limit of viability or Previable Premature Rupture of there is persistent, severe oligohydramnios, the patient may choose to reconsider her decision regarding ongoing expectant management. the Membranes before 23 Treatments to seal the membrane defect or restore normal amniotic Weeks’ Gestation fluid volume include transabdominal amnioinfusion and membrane Although the cause is often not apparent, clinical antecedents can be sealing with fibrin, platelet, cryoprecipitate, or gel-foam plugs. These helpful in determining the likely outcomes in some cases of previable methods are described in a review.191 The maternal risks and fetal PROM. Membrane rupture after amniocentesis is associated with ces- benefits of these interventions have not been adequately evaluated, and sation of leakage and subsequent successful pregnancy outcomes in there are inadequate data to recommend that any of these approaches most cases. Alternatively, previable PROM in a pregnancy complicated be incorporated into routine clinical practice. by persistent second-trimester bleeding, oligohydramnios, or an ele- vated level of maternal serum α-fetoprotein more likely reflects an abnormality of placentation, which carries a poor prognosis. The patient with previable PROM and no other indication for Summary immediate delivery should be counseled regarding the risks and bene- When term or preterm PROM occurs, there is the potential for signifi- fits of expectant management, including a realistic appraisal of poten- cant perinatal morbidity and mortality, which can be reduced by con- tial fetal and neonatal outcomes according to the available information sidered and timely obstetric interventions. Expeditious delivery of the for gestational age–appropriate outcomes.71,72,184 In addition to the patient with term and late preterm PROM can reduce the risk of peri- maternal risks of conservative management previously delineated, natal infections without increasing the likelihood of operative delivery. muscle wasting, bone demineralization, and deep venous thrombosis Conservative management of PROM remote from term can reduce can also occur with prolonged bed rest, and there are significant finan- infectious and gestational age–dependent morbidities. Regardless of cial and social implications of prolonged hospitalization. Prediction of management approach, infants delivered after early preterm or previ-
  • 10. 608 CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes able PROM are at high risk for perinatal complications, many of which 19. Carroll SG, Papaioannou S, Davies ET, Nicolaides KH: Maternal assess- cannot be avoided with current technologies and management algo- ment in the prediction of intrauterine infection in preterm prelabor amni- rithms. Attention to early diagnosis and management of complications orrhexis. Fetal Diagn Ther 10:290-296, 1995. that occur after PROM can lead to good perinatal outcomes in many 20. Romero R, Mazor M, Wu YK, et al: Infection in the pathogenesis of preterm labor. Semin Perinatol 12:262-279, 1988. cases. 21. Heddleston L, McDuffie RS Jr, Gibbs RS: A rabbit model for ascending infection in pregnancy: Intervention with indomethacin and delayed ampicillin-sulbactam therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:708-712, 1993. References 22. McDonald HM, O’Loughlin JA, Jolley PT, et al: Changes in vaginal flora 1. Kitzmiller J: Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. In Fuchs F, during pregnancy and association with preterm birth. J Infect Dis 170:724- Stubblefield PG (eds): Preterm Birth Causes, Prevention and Manage- 728, 1994. ment. New York, Macmillan, 1984, p 298. 23. Regan JA, Chao S, James LS: Premature rupture of membranes, preterm 2. Lei H, Kalluri R, Furth EE, et al: Amnion type IV collagen composition delivery, and group B streptococcal colonization of mothers. Am J Obstet and metabolism: Implications for membrane breakdown. Biol. Reprod Gynecol 141:184-186, 1981. 60:176-182, 1999. 24. Alger LS, Lovchik JC, Hebel JR, et al: The association of Chlamydia tra- 3. Lei H, Furth EE, Kalluri R, et al: A program of cell death and extracellular chomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and group B streptococci with preterm matrix degradation is activated in the amnion before the onset of labor. rupture of the membranes and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol J Clin Invest 98:1971-1978, 1997. 159:397-404, 1988. 4. Skinner SJM, Campos GA, Liggins GC: Collagen content of human amni- 25. Ekwo EE, Gosselink CA, Woolson R, Moawad A: Risks for premature otic membranes: Effect of gestation length and premature rupture. Obstet rupture of amniotic membranes. Int J Epidemiol 22:495-503, 1993. Gynecol 57:487-489, 1981. 26. McGregor JA, French JI, Parker R, et al: Prevention of premature birth by 5. Malak TM, Bell SC: Structural characteristic of term human fetal mem- screening and treatment for common genital tract infections: Results of a branes: A novel zone of extreme morphological alteration within the prospective controlled evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:157-167, rupture site. BJOG 101:375-386, 1994. 1995. 6. El Khwad M, Stetzer B, Moore RM, et al: Term human fetal membranes 27. Regan JA, Klebanoff MA, Nugent RP, et al: Colonization with group B have a weak zone overlying the lower uterine pole and cervix before the streptococci in pregnancy and adverse outcome. VIP Study Group. Am J onset of labor. Biol Reprod 72:720-726, 2005. Obstet Gynecol 174:1354-1360, 1996. 7. McLaren J, Taylor DJ, Bell SC: Increased incidence of apoptosis in non- 28. Matorras R, Garcia Perea A, Omeñaca F, et al: Group B streptococcus and labor affected cytotrophoblast cells in term fetal membranes overlying the premature rupture of membranes and preterm delivery. Gynecol Obstet cervix. Hum Reprod 14:2:895-900, 1999. Invest 27:14-18, 1989. 8. McParland PC, Taylor DJ, Bell SC: Mapping of zones of altered morphol- 29. Romero R, Mazor M, Oyarzun E, et al: Is there an association between ogy and choriodeciduaic connective tissue cellular phenotype in human colonization with group B Streptococcus and prematurity? J Reprod Med fetal membranes (amnion and deciduas) overlying the lower uterine pole 34:797-801, 1989. and cervix before labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1481-1488, 30. Kubota T: Relationship between maternal group B streptococcal coloniza- 2003. tion and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 92:926-930, 1998. 9. McLaren J, Taylor DJ, Bell SC: Increased concentration of pro-matrix 31. Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G: Bacterial vagino- metalloproteinase 9 in term fetal membranes overlying the cervix before sis, the inflammatory response and the risk of preterm birth: A role for labor: Implications for membrane remodeling and rupture. Am J Obstet genetic epidemiology in the prevention of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:409-416, 2000. Gynecol 190:1509-1519, 2004. 10. Parry S, Strauss JF: Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. N Engl J 32. Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, et al: Association between bacterial Med 338:663-670, 1998. vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal 11. Athayde N, Edwin SS, Romero R, et al: A role for matrix metalloprotein- Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 333:1737-1742, ase-9 in spontaneous rupture of the fetal membranes. Am J Obstet 1995. Gynecol 179:1248-1253, 1998. 33. Lavery JP, Miller CE, Knight RD: The effect of labor on the rheologic 12. Garite TJ, Freeman RK, Linzey EM, Braly P: The use of amniocentesis in response of chorioamniotic membranes. Obstet Gynecol 60:87-92, 1982. patients with premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 54:226- 34. Meis PJ, Ernest JM, Moore ML: Causes of low birth-weight births in public 230, 1979. and private patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1165-1168, 1987. 13. Cotton DB, Gonik B, Bottoms SF: Conservative vs. aggressive manage- 35. Tucker JM, Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, et al: Etiologies of preterm birth ment of preterm rupture of membranes. A randomized trial of amnio- in an indigent population: Is prevention a logical expectation? Obstet centesis. Am J Perinatol 1:322-324, 1984. Gynecol 77:343-347, 1991. 14. Romero R, Quintero R, Oyarzun E, et al: Intraamniotic infection and the 36. Taylor J, Garite T: Premature rupture of the membranes before fetal viabil- onset of labor in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J ity. Obstet Gynecol 64:615-620, 1984. Obstet Gynecol 159:661-666, 1988. 37. Minkoff H, Grunebaum AN, Schwarz RH, et al: Risk factors for prematu- 15. Broekhuizen FF, Gilman M, Hamilton PR: Amniocentesis for Gram stain rity and premature rupture of membranes: A prospective study of the and culture in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet vaginal flora in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150:965-972, 1984. Gynecol 66:316-321, 1985. 38. Naeye R: Factors that predispose to premature rupture of the fetal mem- 16. Dudley J, Malcolm G, Ellwood D: Amniocentesis in the management of branes. Obstet Gynecol 60:93-98, 1982. preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynae- 39. Maradny EE, Kanayama N, Halim A, et al: Stretching of fetal membranes col 31:331-336, 1991. increases the concentration of interleukin-8 and collagenase activity. 17. Gauthier DW, Meyer WJ: Comparison of gram stain, leukocyte esterase Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:843-849, 1996. activity, and amniotic fluid glucose concentration in predicting amniotic 40. Ekwo EE, Gosselink CA, Moawad A: Unfavorable outcome in penultimate fluid culture results in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J pregnancy and premature rupture of membranes in successive pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 167:1092-1095, 1992. Obstet Gynecol 80:166-172, 1982. 18. Mercer BM, Moretti ML, Prevost RR, Sibai BM: Erythromycin therapy in 41. Harger JH, Hsing AW, Tuomala RE, et al: Risk factors for preterm prema- preterm premature rupture of the membranes: A prospective, randomized ture rupture of fetal membranes: A multicenter case-control study. Am J trial of 220 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:794-802, 1992. Obstet Gynecol 163:130-137, 1990.
  • 11. CHAPTER 31 Premature Rupture of the Membranes 609 42. Naeye RL, Peters EC: Causes and consequences of premature rupture of 64. Simpson GF, Harbert GM Jr: Use of β-methasone in management of the fetal membranes. Lancet 1:192-194, 1980. preterm gestation with premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 43. Charles D, Edwards WB: Infectious complications of cervical cerclage. 66:168-175, 1985. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141:1065-1070, 1981. 65. Gonen R, Hannah ME, Milligan JE: Does prolonged preterm premature 44. Gold RB, Goyer GL, Schwartz, et al: Conservative management of second rupture of the membranes predispose to abruptio placentae? Obstet trimester post-amniocentesis fluid leakage. Obstet Gynecol 74:745-747, Gynecol 74:347-350, 1989. 1989. 66. Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ, Weinbaum PJ: Preterm 45. Hadley CB, Main DM, Gabbe SG: Risk factors for preterm premature premature rupture of the membranes: A risk factor for the development rupture of the fetal membranes. Am J Perinatol 7:374-379, 1990. of abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:1235-1238, 1987. 46. Mercer BM, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al, and the National Institutes of 67. Schucker JL, Mercer BM: Midtrimester premature rupture of the mem- Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Units branes. Semin Perinatol 20:389-400, 1996. (NICHD-MFMU) Network: The preterm prediction study: Prediction of 68. Moberg LJ, Garite TJ, Freeman RK: Fetal heart rate patterns and fetal dis- preterm premature rupture of the membranes using clinical findings and tress in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet ancillary testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:738-745, 2000. Gynecol 64:60-64, 1984. 47. Roberts AK, Monzon-Bordonaba F, Van Deerlin PG, et al: Association of 69. Bengtson JM, VanMarter LJ, Barss VA, et al: Pregnancy outcome after polymorphism within the promoter of the tumor necrosis factor alpha premature rupture of the membranes at or before 26 weeks’ gestation. gene with increased risk of preterm premature rupture of the fetal mem- Obstet Gynecol 73:921-926, 1989. branes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1297-1302, 1999. 70. Beydoun SN, Yasin SY: Premature rupture of the membranes before 28 48. Millar LK, Boesche MH, Yamamoto SY, et al: A relaxin mediated pathway weeks: Conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:471-479, to preterm premature rupture of the fetal membranes that is independent 1986. of infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:126-134, 1998. 71. Mercer BM: Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet 49. Meis PJ, Klebanoff M, Thom E, et al, for the National Institute of Child Gynecol 101:178-193, 2003. Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network: 72. Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, et al: Very low birth weight outcomes of the Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogester- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal one caproate. N Engl J Med 348:2379-2385, 2003. Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neo- 50. da Fonseca EB, Bittar RE, Carvalho MH, Zugaib M: Prophylactic admin- natal Research Network. Pediatrics 107:E1-E8, 2001. istration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence 73. Wu YW, Colford JM Jr: Chorioamnionitis as a risk factor for cerebral of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: A randomized palsy: A meta-analysis. JAMA 284:1417-1424, 2000. placebo-controlled double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:419-424, 74. Yoon BH, Jun JK, Romero R, et al: Amniotic fluid inflammatory cytokines 2003. (interleukin-6, interleukin 1b, and tumor necrosis factor-α), neonatal 51. Casanueva E, Ripoll C, Tolentino M, et al: Vitamin C supplementation to brain white matter lesions, and cerebral palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol prevent premature rupture of the chorioamniotic membranes: A random- 177:19-26, 1997. ized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 81:859-863, 2005. 75. Yoon BH, Romero R, Kim CJ, et al: High expression of tumor necrosis 52. Rumbold A, Crowther CA: Vitamin C supplementation in pregnancy. factor-alpha and interleukin-6 in periventricular leukomalacia. Am J Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD004072, 2005. Obstet Gynecol 177:406-411, 1997. 53. Mercer BM, Goldenberg RL, Moawad AH, et al: for the National Institutes 76. Yoon BH, Romero R, Yang SH, et al: Interleukin-6 concentrations in of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Units umbilical cord plasma are elevated in neonates with white matter lesions (NICHD-MFMU) Network: The preterm prediction study: Effect of ges- associated with periventricular leukomalacia. Am J Obstet Gynecol tational age and cause of preterm birth on subsequent obstetric outcome. 174:1433-1440, 1996. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1216-1221, 1999. 77. Locatelli A, Ghidini A, Paterlini G, et al: Gestational age at preterm pre- 54. Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, et al: Induction of labor compared with mature rupture of membranes: A risk factor for neonatal white matter expectant management for prelabor rupture of membranes at term. damage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:947-951, 2005. N Engl J Med 334:1005-1010, 1996. 78. Louis JM, Ehrenberg HM, Collin MF, Mercer BM: Perinatal intervention 55. Wagner MV, Chin VP, Peters CJ, et al: A comparison of early and delayed and neonatal outcomes near the limit of viability. Am J Obstet Gynecol induction of labor with spontaneous rupture of membranes at term. 191:1398-1402, 2004. Obstet Gynecol 74:93-97, 1989. 79. Kilpatrick SJ, Schlueter MA, Piecuch R, et al: Outcome of infants born at 56. Mercer B, Arheart K: Antimicrobial therapy in expectant management of 24-26 weeks’ gestation. I. Survival and cost. Obstet Gynecol 90:803-808, preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Lancet 346:1271-1279, 1997. 1995. 80. Bottoms SF, Paul RH, Iams JD, et al: Obstetric determinants of neonatal 57. Johnson JWC, Egerman RS, Moorhead J: Cases with ruptured membranes survival: Influence of willingness to perform cesarean delivery on survival that “reseal.” Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:1024-1032, 1990. of extremely low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:960-966, 58. Borgida AF, Mills AA, Feldman DM, et al: Outcome of pregnancies com- 1997. plicated by ruptured membranes after genetic amniocentesis. Am J Obstet 81. Dewan H, Morris JM: A systematic review of pregnancy outcome follow- Gynecol 183:937-939, 2000. ing preterm premature rupture of membranes at a previable gestational 59. Gunn GC, Mishell DR, Morton DG: Premature rupture of the fetal mem- age. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:389-394, 2001. branes: A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 106:469-482, 1970. 82. Vergani P, Ghidini A, Locatelli A, et al: Risk factors for pulmonary hypo- 60. Hillier SL, Martius J, Krohn M, et al: A case-control study of chorioamni- plasia in second-trimester premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet onic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity. N Engl J Gynecol 170:1359-1364, 1994. Med 319:972-978, 1988. 83. Rotschild A, Ling EW, Puterman ML, Farquharson D: Neonatal outcome 61. Morales WJ: The effect of chorioamnionitis on the developmental after prolonged preterm rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol outcome of preterm infants at one year. Obstet Gynecol 70:183-186, 162:46-52, 1990. 1987. 84. van Eyck J, van der Mooren K, Wladimiroff JW: Ductus arteriosus flow 62. Guise JM, Duff P, Christian JS: Management of term patients with pre- velocity modulation by fetal breathing movements as a measure of fetal mature rupture of membranes and an unfavorable cervix. Am J Perinatol lung development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:558-566, 1990. 9:56-60, 1992. 85. Hibbard JU, Hibbard MC, Ismail M, Arendt E: Pregnancy outcome after 63. Garite TJ, Freeman RK: Chorioamnionitis in the preterm gestation. Obstet expectant management of premature rupture of the membranes in the Gynecol 59:539-545, 1982. second trimester. J Reprod Med 38:945-951, 1993.