2. Associate Professor Janet Clinton
Professor Stephen Dinham
The Centre for Program Evaluation
Melbourne Graduate School of Education
Australian College of Educators
Professor John Hattie
Professor Robert Lingard
Dr Glenn Savage
Ruth Aston
The Centre for Program Evaluation
The Centre for Program Evaluation
Dr Amy Gullickson
Ru Ying Cai
Melbourne Education Research Institute
The Centre for Program Evaluation
Australian College of Educators
The Centre for Program Evaluation

3. Agenda
Presenter
Welcome
University of Melbourne
Introduction to the Evaluation of the implementation of
the Standards
AITSL
Jurisdictional context in relation to the Standards
Jurisdictional representative
Standards in Education
Expert
University of Melbourne
Evaluation
University of Melbourne
Activity 1: Implementation mapping by initiative
Activity 2: Defining implementation success
University of Melbourne
Afternoon tea
Activity 3: Assessing implementation success
University of Melbourne
Questions
AITSL team
University of Melbourne team
Closing comments
University of Melbourne

5. Dual purpose:
• improvement
• career progression
Map progression:
• Graduate
• Proficient
• Highly Accomplished
• Lead

6. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine the:
• usefulness of the implementation of the Standards…
• effectiveness of implementation of the Standards…
• impact of the implementation of the Standards…
… on improving teacher quality
This is not an evaluation of the content of the Standards.

10. Adapted from the Centres for Disease Control & Prevention Framework

11. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine the:
• usefulness of the implementation of the Standards…
• effectiveness of implementation of the Standards…
• impact of the implementation of the Standards…
… on improving teacher quality
This is not an evaluation of the content of the Standards.

12. • Activity 1: Implementation mapping by initiative
• Activity 2: Defining implementation success
• Activity 3: Assessing implementation success

13. • In your group:
1.
Map current activities and the
responsible organisation in
black
2.
Map up-coming activities and
the responsible organisation in
blue
3.
Map potential activities and the
responsible organisation in red
 Please use the full name of any document, organisation or group you refer
to.

14. In your group:
• Discuss what successful
implementation looks like.
i.e. How do you know the
implementation of the initiative has been
successful?
• On butchers paper, list the
features of successful
implementation for your chosen
initiative.

15. By yourself:
• Assess your two examples using the success criteria rubric
provided
As a table:
• Discuss your individual assessment of the examples with your
table, and come to a consensus on a final rating for each of
the success criteria for both examples
• Make note of the debate on your table
As a whole group:
• Talk through your final assessment of the examples with the
whole group

17. The examples
• Not ideal but a range
• It’s about progression
• Different elements of success
• Score against each of the success criteria and explain why
Success criteria
• What’s missing?
• Do they work?
The commentary
• The debates
• The gaps

18. • Collate
• Analyse
• Provide feedback

19. Do you have any questions for…
• The University of Melbourne evaluation team?
• the AITSL team?

20. … the Evaluation team
A/Professor Janet Clinton
jclinton@unimelb.edu.au
+61 9035 3697
Dr Amy Gullickson
amy.gullickson@unimelb.edu.au
+61 9035 9682
Ms Ruth Aston
ruth.aston@unimelb.edu.au
+61 9035 8350
… AITSL
aitsl.edu.au
newsroom.aitsl.edu.au
@
anne.loos@aitsl.edu.au
@aitsl
www.facebook.com/aitsl
iTunes U > Australian Institute for
Teaching and School Leadership
youtube.com/aitsleduau